Hypothesis Test with Known\(\sigma \)How do the results from Exercise 14 “Speed Dating” change if\(\sigma \)is known to be 1.99? Does the knowledge of\(\sigma \)have much of an effect?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Null Hypothesis: The mean of the population of male attractiveness ratings is equal to 7.00.

Alternative Hypothesis: The mean of the population of male attractiveness ratings is less than 7.00.

Test Statistic: -5.742

Critical Value: -2.3263

P-Value: 0.000

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean value of the male attractiveness ratings is less than 7.00.

There are no significant differences in the test statistic value as well as the conclusion drawn in the case of the two hypothesis tests: Using normal distribution when\(\sigma \)is known and using student’s distribution when\(\sigma \)is unknown.

There is not a major impact of the knowledge of the population standard deviation \(\left( \sigma \right)\) on the result of the hypothesis test.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A sample of 199 male attractiveness ratings is considered with a sample mean value equal to 6.19. The population standard deviation is equal to 1.99.

It is claimed that the mean value of the population of male attractiveness ratings is less than 7.00.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is written as follows:

The mean of the population of male attractiveness ratings is equal to 7.00.

\({H_0}:\mu = 7.00\)

The alternative hypothesis is written as follows:

The mean of the population of male attractiveness ratings is less than 7.00.

\({H_1}:\mu < 7.00\)

The test is left-tailed.

03

Important values

The sample size is equal to n=199.

The sample mean value of the male attractiveness ratings is equal to 6.19.

The population mean value of the male attractiveness ratings is equal to 7.00.

The population standard deviation is equal to 1.99.

04

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\bar x - \mu }}{{\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}}}\\ = \frac{{6.19 - 7.00}}{{\frac{{1.99}}{{\sqrt {199} }}}}\\ = - 5.742\end{array}\)

Thus, z=-5.742.

05

Critical value and p-value

Referring to the standard normal table, the critical value of z at\(\alpha = 0.01\)for a left-tailed test is equal to -2.3263.

Referring to the standard normal table, the p-value for the test statistic value of -5.742 is equal to 0.000.

Since the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

06

Conclusion of the test

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean value of the male attractiveness ratings is less than 7.00.

07

Step 7: \(\sigma \) known vs \(\sigma \) unknown

When \(\sigma \) is unknown, the test statistic value is equal to -5.742, and the corresponding p-value (using student’s t distribution) is equal to 0.000.

The same conclusion is drawn as above, that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the population mean value of the male attractiveness ratings is less than 7.00.

Furthermore, the test statistic value is identical for the two tests: the test using normal distribution when sigma is known and the test using Student's t distribution when sigma is unknown.

There does not seem to be a significant effect of \(\sigma \) for conducting the hypothesis test.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Touch Therapy Repeat the preceding exercise using a 0.01 significance level. Does the conclusion change?

Technology. In Exercises 9–12, test the given claim by using the display provided from technology. Use a 0.05 significance level. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Tornadoes Data Set 22 “Tornadoes” in Appendix B includes data from 500 random tornadoes. The accompanying StatCrunch display results from using the tornado lengths (miles) to test the claim that the mean tornado length is greater than 2.5 miles.

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29–32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of people with blue eyes is equal to 0.35.

Test Statistics. In Exercises 13–16, refer to the exercise identified and find the value of the test statistic. (Refer to Table 8-2 on page 362 to select the correct expression for evaluating the test statistic.)

Exercise 7 “Pulse Rates”

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Car Booster Seats The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conducted crash tests of child booster seats for cars. Listed below are results from those tests, with the measurements given in hic (standard head injury condition units). The safety requirement is that the hic measurement should be less than 1000 hic. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. Do the results suggest that all of the child booster seats meet the specified requirement?

774 649 1210 546 431 612

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free