Hypothesis Test for Lightning Deaths Refer to the sample data given in Cumulative Review Exercise 1 and consider those data to be a random sample of annual lightning deaths from recent years. Use those data with a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean number of annual lightning deaths is less than the mean of 72.6 deaths from the 1980s. If the mean is now lower than in the past, identify one of the several factors that could explain the decline.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the mean number of deaths due to lightning strikes is less than 72.6.

By practicing better lightning protection techniques with the help of advanced tools and equipment such as lightning arrestors, the number of deaths due to lightning has declined.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data are given on the number of deaths that have occurred due to lightning strikes for a series of 14 consecutive years. It is claimed that the mean number of deaths is less than 72.6.

02

Hypotheses

Corresponding to the given claim, the following hypotheses are set up:

Null Hypothesis: The mean number of deaths is equal to 72.6.

H0:μ=72.6

Alternative Hypothesis: The mean number of deaths is less than 72.6.

H1:μ<72.6

The test is left-tailed.

03

Important values

The sample size (n) is equal to.

The sample mean is computed below:

x¯=51+44+........+2314=37.1

The sample standard deviation is computed below:

s=i=1n(xi-x¯)2n-1=51-37.12+44-37.12+.......+23-37.1214-1=9.8

The population mean is equal to 72.6.

04

Test statistic

The test statistic value is obtained as follows:

t=x¯-μsn=37.1-72.69.814=-13.55

Thus, t=-13.55.

The degrees of freedom are computed below:

df=n-1=14-1=13

Referring to the student’s t distribution table, the critical value of t atα=0.05 and 13 degrees of freedom for a left-tailed test is equal to -1.7709. The p-value corresponding to the test statistic value of -13.51 is equal to 0.000.

Since the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

Conclusion

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the mean number of deaths due to lightning strikes is less than 72.6.

One possible factor due to which there is a significant decline in the number of deaths caused by lightning is that the infrastructure built is suitable for the prevention of casualties by proper grounding of electric cables and phone lines and using better equipment such as lightning arrestors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Eliquis The drug Eliquis (apixaban) is used to help prevent blood clots in certain patients. In clinical trials, among 5924 patients treated with Eliquis, 153 developed the adverse reaction of nausea (based on data from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that 3% of Eliquis users develop nausea. Does nausea appear to be a problematic adverse reaction?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Births A random sample of 860 births in New York State included 426 boys. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that 51.2% of newborn babies are boys. Do the results support the belief that 51.2% of newborn babies are boys?

Cans of coke for the sample data from exercise 1, we get “P-value<0.01” when testing the claim that the new filling process results in volumes with the same standard deviation of 0.115 oz.

  1. What should we conclude about the null hypothesis?
  2. What should we conclude about the original claims?
  3. What do these results suggest about the new filling process?

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

How Many English Words? A simple random sample of 10 pages from Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary is obtained. The numbers of words defined on those pages are found, with these results: n = 10, x = 53.3 words, s = 15.7 words. Given that this dictionary has 1459 pages with defined words, the claim that there are more than 70,000 defined words is equivalent to the claim that the mean number of words per page is greater than 48.0 words. Assume a normally distributed population. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean number of words per page is greater than 48.0 words. What does the result suggest about the claim that there are more than 70,000 defined words?

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 6 “Cell Phone”

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free