Testing Claims About Variation. In Exercises 5–16, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population.

Cola Cans A random sample of 20 aluminum cola cans with thickness 0.0109 in. is selected and the axial loads are measured and the standard deviation is 18.6 lb. The axial load is the pressure applied to the top that causes the can to crush. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that cans with thickness 0.0109 in. have axial loads with the same standard deviation as the axial loads of cans that are 0.0111 in. thick. The thicker cans have axial loads with a standard deviation of 27.8 lb (based on Data Set 30 “Aluminum Cans” in Appendix B). Does the thickness of the cans appear to affect the variation of the axial loads?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Hypotheses for the claim:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_0}:\sigma = 27.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\{{\rm{H}}_1}:\sigma \ne 27.8\end{array}\)

The test statistic is 8.505.

The critical values are obtained as 8.907 and 32.852.

The null hypothesis is rejected at a 0.05 level of significance. Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim.

It can be stated that the thickness of the cans appears to affect the variation of the axial loads.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A random sample of 20 aluminum cola cans with athickness of 0.0109 in measured for the axial loads has astandard deviation of 18.6 lb.

The significance level is 0.05.

The claim to be tested is that the axial load standard deviation for cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in is the same as the cans with a thickness of 0.0111 in.

02

Describe the hypothesis testing

For applying the hypothesis test, first, set up a null and an alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis is the statement about the value of a population parameter, which is equal to the claimed value. It is denoted by\({H_0}\).

The alternate hypothesis is a statement that the parameter has a value opposite to the null hypothesis. It is denoted by\({H_1}\).

03

State the null and alternative hypotheses

The claim is that cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in have axial loads with the same standard deviation\(\left( \sigma \right)\)of 27.8 lb.

From the claim, the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows.

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_0}:\sigma = 27.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\{{\rm{H}}_1}:\sigma \ne 27.8\end{array}\)

Here, \(\sigma \) is the measure of standard deviation for axial loads with a thickness of 0.0109 in.

04

Find the test statistic

To conduct a hypothesis test of a claim about a population standard deviation\(\sigma \) or population variance\({\sigma ^2}\),the test statistic is stated as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{\chi ^2} = \frac{{\left( {{\rm{n}} - 1} \right) \times {s^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\\ = \frac{{\left( {20 - 1} \right) \times {{18.6}^2}}}{{{{27.8}^2}}}\\ = 8.5053\end{array}\).

Thus, the value of the test statistic is 8.5053.

05

Find the critical value

For a two-sided hypothesis, divide the\(\alpha \)equally between two tails as\(\frac{\alpha }{2}\)and\(1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\).

Mathematically,

\(P\left( {{\chi ^2} < \chi _{\frac{\alpha }{2}}^2} \right) = 1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\)and

\(P\left( {{\chi ^2} > \chi _{\frac{\alpha }{2}}^2} \right) = \frac{\alpha }{2}\).

Referring to chi-square table, the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)is obtained corresponding to row 19 and significance level 0.025 as 32.852.

Referring to Table A-4, chi-square table, the critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)is obtained corresponding to row 19 and significance level 0.975 as as 8.907 from the area to the right of 0.975

Thus, the critical values are 8.907 and 32.852, and the non-rejection region is \(\left( {{\chi ^2}:8.907 < {\chi ^2} < 32.852} \right)\).

06

Conclude the test result

The decision rule for the test is as follows.

If the value of the test statistic lies beyond the non-region, reject the null hypothesis at the given level of significance; otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, it is observed that\({\chi ^2} = 8.505\)lies beyond the non-rejection region.

Therefore, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected, and it can be stated that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that cans with a thickness of 0.0109 in have the same load as the ones with 0.0111 in thickness.

Hence, it can be concluded that the thickness of the cans appears to affect the variation of the axial loads.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 1–4, use these results from a USA Today survey in which 510 people chose to respond to this question that was posted on the USA Today website: “Should Americans replace passwords with biometric security (fingerprints, etc)?” Among the respondents, 53% said “yes.” We want to test the claim that more than half of the population believes that passwords should be replaced with biometric security.

Number and Proportion

a. Identify the actual number of respondents who answered “yes.”

b. Identify the sample proportion and the symbol used to represent it.

Vitamin C and Aspirin A bottle contains a label stating that it contains Spring Valley pills with 500 mg of vitamin C, and another bottle contains a label stating that it contains Bayer pills with 325 mg of aspirin. When testing claims about the mean contents of the pills, which would have more serious implications: rejection of the Spring Valley vitamin C claim or rejection of the Bayer aspirin claim? Is it wise to use the same significance level for hypothesis tests about the mean amount of vitamin C and the mean amount of aspirin?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Overtime Rule in Football Before the overtime rule in the National Football League was changed in 2011, among 460 overtime games, 252 were won by the team that won the coin toss at the beginning of overtime. Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the coin toss is fair in the sense that neither team has an advantage by winning it. Does the coin toss appear to be fair?

Identifying H0and H1. In Exercises 5–8, do the following:

a. Express the original claim in symbolic form.

b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Pulse Rates Claim: The mean pulse rate (in beats per minute, or bpm) of adult males is equal to 69 bpm. For the random sample of 153 adult males in Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B, the mean pulse rate is 69.6 bpm and the standard deviation is 11.3 bpm.

Test Statistics. In Exercises 13–16, refer to the exercise identified and find the value of the test statistic. (Refer to Table 8-2 on page 362 to select the correct expression for evaluating the test statistic.)

Exercise 7 “Pulse Rates”

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free