Robust Explain what is meant by the statements that the t test for a claim about\(\mu \)is robust, but the\({\chi ^2}\)test for a claim about\({\sigma ^2}\)is not robust.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The meaning of the given statement is that the t distribution gives accurate results about the hypothesis test even if the population is not strictly normally distributed. On the other hand, the chi-square distribution does not produce accurate result if the considered population is not strictly normally distributed.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

It is given that the t test for a claim about \(\mu \) is robust, but the \({\chi ^2}\) test for a claim about \({\sigma ^2}\) is not robust.

02

Interpretation of the distribution being robust

If the distribution of the test statistic is robust, it implies that the distribution is not very strict about the requirement of the population to be normally distributed. The test will work fine even if the population is not exactly normally distributed and the considered sample size is large.

And if the distribution of the test statistic is not robust, it means the opposite.

Here, the t test works well if the sample is from a population that is not perfectly normally distributed.

The chi-square test is not robust against deviations from normality, which means it does not work well if the population is not perfectly normally distributed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 1–4, use these results from a USA Today survey in which 510 people chose to respond to this question that was posted on the USA Today website: “Should Americans replace passwords with biometric security (fingerprints, etc)?” Among the respondents, 53% said “yes.” We want to test the claim that more than half of the population believes that passwords should be replaced with biometric security.

Equivalence of Methods If we use the same significance level to conduct the hypothesis test using the P-value method, the critical value method, and a confidence interval, which method is not equivalent to the other two?

Finding P-values. In Exercises 5–8, either use technology to find the P-value or use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value.

Airport Data Speeds: The claim that for Verizon data speeds at airports, the mean. The sample size is and the test statistic is

t =-1.625 .

Identifying H0 and H1 . In Exercises 5–8, do the following:

a. Express the original claim in symbolic form.

b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Online Data Claim: Most adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could. A GFI Software survey of 565 randomly selected adults showed that 59% of them would erase all of their personal information online if they could.

Cans of coke for the sample data from exercise 1, we get “P-value<0.01” when testing the claim that the new filling process results in volumes with the same standard deviation of 0.115 oz.

  1. What should we conclude about the null hypothesis?
  2. What should we conclude about the original claims?
  3. What do these results suggest about the new filling process?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Overtime Rule in Football Before the overtime rule in the National Football League was changed in 2011, among 460 overtime games, 252 were won by the team that won the coin toss at the beginning of overtime. Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the coin toss is fair in the sense that neither team has an advantage by winning it. Does the coin toss appear to be fair?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free