Find and interpret 95 % confidence interval for the proportion of all US adults who never clothes-shop online.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is 95%confidence interval for the proportion of all US adults who never clothes-shop online between 0.291 and 0.349.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A total of 1000 adults in the U S were polled regarding their online vs. in-store clothing purchase habits.

32% of respondents never shop for garments online.

02

explanation

The one-proportion z-interval technique is appropriate because x and n are both 5 or more.

The confidence interval is 95 percent, which equals
α=0.05.

It discovers that zα/2=z0.05/2=1.96

For p, the confidence interval is of the type

pza/2p(1p)ntop+za/2p(1p)ni.e.0.321.9600.32(10.32)1000to0.321.9600.32(10.32)1000i.e.0.32±1.960(0.0148)0.32±0.0290(0.291,0.349)

As a result, the 95% confidence interval for the fraction of all US adults who never shop for garments online is (0.291,0.349).

interpretation:

The proportion of all US adults who never buy for garments online has a 95 percent confidence interval between 0.291 and 0.349.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Notation for the sample data given in exercise 1, consider the salk vaccine treatment group to be the first sample. Identify the values of \({{\bf{n}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{,}}{{\bf{\hat p}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{,}}{{\bf{\hat q}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{,}}{{\bf{n}}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{,}}{{\bf{\hat p}}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{,}}{{\bf{\hat q}}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{,\bar p}}\) and \({\bf{\bar q}}\). Round all values so that they have six significant digits.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Smoking Cessation Programs Among 198 smokers who underwent a “sustained care” program, 51 were no longer smoking after six months. Among 199 smokers who underwent a “standard care” program, 30 were no longer smoking after six months (based on data from “Sustained Care Intervention and Postdischarge Smoking Cessation Among Hospitalized Adults,” by Rigotti et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 312, No. 7). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of success for smoking cessation is greater with the sustained care program.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Does the difference between the two programs have practical significance?

Confidence Interval for Haemoglobin

Large samples of women and men are obtained, and the haemoglobin level is measured in each subject. Here is the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two population means, where the measures from women correspond to population 1 and the measures from men correspond to population 2: -1.76g/dL<μ1-μ2<-1.62g/dL.

a. What does the confidence interval suggest about equality of the mean hemoglobin level in women and the mean hemoglobin level in men?

b. Write a brief statement that interprets that confidence interval.

c. Express the confidence interval with measures from men being population 1 and measures from women being population 2.

Denomination Effect Construct the confidence interval that could be used to test the claim in Exercise 1. What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion from Exercise 1?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Are Seat Belts Effective? A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed (based on data from “Who Wants Airbags?” by Meyer and Finney, Chance, Vol. 18, No. 2). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. What does the result suggest about the effectiveness of seat belts?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free