Count Five Test for Comparing Variation in Two Populations Repeat Exercise 16 “Blanking Out on Tests,” but instead of using the F test, use the following procedure for the “count five” test of equal variations (which is not as complicated as it might appear).

a. For each value x in the first sample, find the absolute deviation \(\left| {x - \bar x} \right|\) , then sort the absolute deviation values. Do the same for the second sample.

b. Let \({c_1}\)be the count of the number of absolute deviation values in the first sample that is greater than the largest absolute deviation value in the second sample. Also, let \({c_2}\)be the count of the number of absolute deviation values in the second sample that are greater than the largest absolute deviation value in the first sample. (One of these counts will always be zero.)

c. If the sample sizes are equal (\({n_1} = {n_2}\)), use a critical value of 5. If\({n_1} \ne {n_2}\), calculate the critical value shown below.

\(\frac{{\log \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{{n_1}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}} \right)}}\)

d. If \({c_1} \ge \) critical value, then conclude that \(\sigma _1^2 > \sigma _2^2\). If \({c_2} \ge \)critical value, then conclude that \(\sigma _2^2 > \sigma _1^2\). Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis of \(\sigma _1^2 = \sigma _2^2\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the two populations of scores have different amounts of variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples are considered.

One sample represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult in the test paper with a sample size equal to 25, and the other represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy in the test paper with a sample size equal to 16.

It is claimed that the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is different from the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

02

Hypotheses

Let\({\sigma _1}\)and\({\sigma _2}\)be the population standard deviationsof the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult and the arrangement from difficult to easy, respectively.

Null Hypothesis: The population standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to thepopulation standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)

Alternate Hypothesis: The population standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is not equal to thepopulation standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_1}:{\sigma _1} \ne {\sigma _2}\)

03

Compute the absolute deviations for both the samples

a.

The sample mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficultis equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{24.64 + 39.29 + .... + 30.72}}{{25}}\\ = 27.12\end{array}\)

Subtract the sample values for the first sample for the sample mean. Take the absolute values of the deviations. Sort the absolute deviations in ascending order.

The following table shows the absolute deviations for the first sample:

x

\(\left( {x - {{\bar x}_1}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {{\bar x}_1}} \right|\)

24.64

-2.48

2.475

39.29

12.17

12.175

16.32

-10.80

10.795

32.83

5.71

5.715

28.02

0.90

0.905

33.31

6.19

6.195

20.6

-6.52

6.515

21.13

-5.99

5.985

26.69

-0.43

0.425

28.9

1.78

1.785

26.43

-0.69

0.685

24.23

-2.89

2.885

7.1

-20.02

20.015

32.86

5.74

5.745

21.06

-6.06

6.055

28.89

1.77

1.775

28.71

1.59

1.595

31.73

4.61

4.615

30.02

2.90

2.905

21.96

-5.16

5.155

25.49

-1.63

1.625

38.81

11.69

11.695

27.85

0.73

0.735

30.29

3.17

3.175

30.72

3.60

3.605

The sorted values of the absolute deviations are shown below:

0.425

0.685

0.735

0.905

1.595

1.625

1.775

1.785

2.475

2.885

2.905

3.175

3.605

4.615

5.155

5.715

5.745

5.985

6.055

6.195

6.515

10.795

11.695

12.175

20.015






The mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{33.62 + 34.02 + .... + 32.54}}{{16}}\\ = 31.73\end{array}\)

Subtract the sample values for the second sample for the sample mean. Take the absolute values of the deviations. Sort the absolute deviations in ascending order.

The following table shows the absolute deviations for the second sample:

x

\(\left( {x - {{\bar x}_2}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {{\bar x}_2}} \right|\)

33.62

1.89

1.892

34.02

2.29

2.292

26.63

-5.10

5.098

30.26

-1.47

1.468

35.91

4.18

4.182

26.68

-5.05

5.048

29.49

-2.24

2.238

35.32

3.59

3.592

27.24

-4.49

4.488

32.34

0.61

0.612

29.34

-2.39

2.388

33.53

1.80

1.802

27.62

-4.11

4.108

42.91

11.18

11.182

30.2

-1.53

1.528

32.54

0.81

0.812

The sorted values of the absolute deviations are shown below:

0.612

0.812

1.468

1.528

1.802

1.892

2.238

2.292

2.388

3.592

4.108

4.182

4.488

5.048

5.098

11.182





04

Values of \({c_1}\)and\({c_2}\)

b.

The largest absolute value in the second sample is 11.182. Thus, theabsolute deviations in the first sample that are greater than 11.182 are 11.695, 12.175, and 20.015.

Therefore,\({c_1} = 3\)

The largest absolute value in the first sample is 20.015. Thus, none of the absolute deviations in the second sample are greater than 20.015.

Therefore, \({c_2} = 0\)

05

State the critical value

c.

The value of\({n_1}\)is equal to 25, and the value of\({n_2}\)is equal to 16.

Since\({n_1} \ne {n_2}\), the critical value is given by the formula mentioned below:

\({\rm{Critical}}\;V{\rm{alue}} = \frac{{\log \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{{n_1}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}} \right)}}\)

Substitute\(\alpha = 0.05\),\({n_1} = 25\)and\({n_2} = 16\)in the above formula and simplify to compute the required value as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Critical}}\;V{\rm{alue}} = \frac{{\log \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{{n_1}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}} \right)}}\\ = \frac{{\log \left( {\frac{{0.05}}{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{25}}{{25 + 16}}} \right)}}\\ = 7.4569\end{array}\)

06

Resultbased on the given condition

d.

  • If the value of\({c_1}\)is greater than the critical value, the conclusion of\(\sigma _1^2 > \sigma _2^2\)is made.
  • If the value of\({c_2}\)is greater than the critical value, the conclusion of\(\sigma _2^2 > \sigma _1^2\)is made.
  • If neither of the above conditions satisfy, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

Here,

\(\begin{array}{c}{c_1} = 3 < 7.4568\\{c_2} = 0 < 7.4568\end{array}\)

Thus, the critical value is greaterthan both \({c_1}\)and\({c_2}\). This implies that the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

07

Conclusion

Thus, there is not enough evidence to supportthe claimthat the two populations of scores have different amounts of variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

Seat Belts A study of seat belt use involved children who were hospitalized after motor vehicle crashes. For a group of 123 children who were wearing seat belts, the number of days in intensive care units (ICU) has a mean of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 1.77. For a group of 290 children who were not wearing seat belts, the number of days spent in ICUs has a mean of 1.39 and a standard deviation of 3.06 (based on data from “Morbidity Among Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Victims: The Effectiveness of Seat Belts,” by Osberg and Di Scala, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that children wearing seat belts have a lower mean length of time in an ICU than the mean for children not wearing seat belts.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What important conclusion do the results suggest?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Smoking Cessation Programs Among 198 smokers who underwent a “sustained care” program, 51 were no longer smoking after six months. Among 199 smokers who underwent a “standard care” program, 30 were no longer smoking after six months (based on data from “Sustained Care Intervention and Postdischarge Smoking Cessation Among Hospitalized Adults,” by Rigotti et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 312, No. 7). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of success for smoking cessation is greater with the sustained care program.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Does the difference between the two programs have practical significance?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is Echinacea Effective for Colds? Rhinoviruses typically cause common colds. In a test of the effectiveness of Echinacea, 40 of the 45 subjects treated with Echinacea developed rhinovirus infections. In a placebo group, 88 of the 103 subjects developed rhinovirus infections (based on data from “An Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifolia in Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,” by Turner et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 4). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does Echinacea appear to have any effect on the infection rate?

Does Aspirin Prevent Heart Disease? In a trial designed to test the effectiveness of aspirin in preventing heart disease, 11,037 male physicians were treated with aspirin and 11,034 male physicians were given placebos. Among the subjects in the aspirin treatment group, 139 experienced myocardial infarctions (heart attacks). Among the subjects given placebos, 239 experienced myocardial infarctions (based on data from “Final Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians’ Health Study,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 321: 129–135). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that aspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does aspirin appear to be effective?

Eyewitness Accuracy of Police Does stress affect the recall ability of police eyewitnesses? This issue was studied in an experiment that tested eyewitness memory a week after a nonstressful interrogation of a cooperative suspect and a stressful interrogation of an uncooperative and belligerent suspect. The numbers of details recalled a week after the incident were recorded, and the summary statistics are given below (based on data from “Eyewitness Memory of Police Trainees for Realistic Role Plays,” by Yuille et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 6). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim in the article that “stress decreases the amount recalled.”

Nonstress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 53.3, s = 11.6

Stress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 45.3, s = 13.2

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free