Levene-Brown-Forsythe Test Repeat Exercise 16 “Blanking Out on Tests” using the Levene-Brown-Forsythe test.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the two populations of scores have the same amount of variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples are considered.

One sample represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult in the test paper with a sample size equal to 25, and the other represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy in the test paper with a sample size equal to 16.

It is claimed that the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is different from the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

The claim is to be tested using the Levene-Brown-Forsythe test.

02

Transform the sample values

Transformed sample 1:

Sort the samples in ascending order in the table shown below and obtain the median.

7.1

16.32

20.6

21.06

21.13

21.96

24.23

24.64

25.49

26.43

26.69

27.85

28.02

28.71

28.89

28.9

30.02

30.29

30.72

31.73

32.83

32.86

33.31

38.81

39.29






Since the number of observations in this sample is odd (25), the following formula is used to compute the median:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Median}} = {\left( {\frac{{{n_1} + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}obs\\ = {\left( {\frac{{25 + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}obs\\ = {13^{th}}obs\\ = 28.02\end{array}\)

Now subtract the median from each sample value and take the absolute value of the difference.

The following table shows the absolute deviations:

Sample values (x)

\(\left( {x - {\rm{median}}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {\rm{median}}} \right|\)

24.64

-3.38

3.38

33.31

5.29

5.29

26.43

-1.59

1.59

28.89

0.87

0.87

25.49

-2.53

2.53

39.29

11.27

11.27

20.6

-7.42

7.42

24.23

-3.79

3.79

28.71

0.69

0.69

38.81

10.79

10.79

16.32

-11.7

11.7

21.13

-6.89

6.89

7.1

-20.92

20.92

31.73

3.71

3.71

27.85

-0.17

0.17

32.83

4.81

4.81

26.69

-1.33

1.33

32.86

4.84

4.84

30.02

2

2

30.29

2.27

2.27

28.02

0

0

28.9

0.88

0.88

21.06

-6.96

6.96

21.96

-6.06

6.06

30.72

2.7

2.7

Transformed sample 2:

Sort the samples in ascending order in the table shown below and obtain the median.

26.63

26.68

27.24

27.62

29.34

29.49

30.2

30.26

32.34

32.54

33.53

33.62

34.02

35.32

35.91

42.91





Since the number of observations in this sample is even (16), the following formula is used to compute the median:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Media}}{{\rm{n}}_2} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{n_2}}}{2}} \right)}^{th}}obs + {{\left( {\frac{{{n_2}}}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}obs}}{2}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{16}}{2}} \right)}^{th}}obs + {{\left( {\frac{{16}}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}obs}}{2}\\ = \frac{{{8^{th}}obs + {9^{th}}obs}}{2}\\ = \frac{{30.26 + 32.34}}{2}\\ = 31.3\end{array}\)

Now subtract the median from each sample value and take the absolute value of the difference.

The following table shows the absolute deviations:

Sample values (x)

\(\left( {x - {\rm{median}}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {\rm{median}}} \right|\)

33.62

2.32

2.32

35.91

4.61

4.61

27.24

-4.06

4.06

27.62

-3.68

3.68

34.02

2.72

2.72

26.68

-4.62

4.62

32.34

1.04

1.04

42.91

11.61

11.61

26.63

-4.67

4.67

29.49

-1.81

1.81

29.34

-1.96

1.96

30.2

-1.1

1.1

30.26

-1.04

1.04

35.32

4.02

4.02

33.53

2.23

2.23

32.54

1.24

1.24

03

Hypotheses

Let\({\mu _1}\)and\({\mu _2}\)be the population’smean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult and easy to difficult, respectively.

Null Hypothesis: The population’s mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to the population’s mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\)

Alternate Hypothesis: The population’s mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is not equal to the population mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\)

04

Compute the sample means and sample variances of both the transformed samples

Transformed sample 1:

Let the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of question from easy to difficult is denoted by x.

The sample mean is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{3.38 + 5.29 + ..... + 2.7}}{{25}}\\ = 4.914\end{array}\)

The sample variance is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}s_1^2 = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{{({x_i} - \bar x)}^2}} }}{{{n_1} - 1}}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {3.38 - 4.914} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {5.29 - 4.914} \right)}^2} + ...... + {{\left( {2.7 - 4.914} \right)}^2}}}{{25 - 1}}\\ = 4.766\end{array}\)

Transformed sample 2:

Let the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of question from difficult to easy is denoted by x.

The sample mean is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{2.32 + 4.61 + ..... + 1.24}}{{16}}\\ = 3.296\end{array}\)

The sample variance is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}s_2^2 = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_2})}^2}} }}{{{n_2} - 1}}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {2.32 - 3.296} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {4.61 - 3.296} \right)}^2} + ...... + {{\left( {1.24 - 3.296} \right)}^2}}}{{16 - 1}}\\ = 6.759\end{array}\)

05

Compute the test statistic

Apply the t-test to compute the test statistic using the given formula.

\(t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\).

Substitute the respective values in the above formula and simplify.

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\left( {4.914 - 3.296} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{22.89}}{{25}} + \frac{{6.759}}{{16}}} }}\\ = 1.403\end{array}\)

Thus, t is equal to 1.403.

06

State the critical values and the p-value

The degrees of freedom is the smaller of the two values:\(\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)\)and\(\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)\).

The values are computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_1} - 1 = 25 - 1\\ = 24\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_2} - 1 = 16 - 1\\ = 15\end{array}\)

Thus, the degree of freedom is equal to 15.

The critical values can be obtained using the t distribution table with the degree of freedom equal to 15 and the significance level equal to 0.05 for a two-tailed test.

The critical values are -2.1314 and 2.1314.

The p-value for t equal to 1.403 is equal to 0.1810.

07

Interpretation

Since the test statistic value lies between the two values, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variance in the case of easy to difficult question arrangement is different from the variation in the case of difficult to easy question arrangement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Are Seat Belts Effective? A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed (based on data from “Who Wants Airbags?” by Meyer and Finney, Chance, Vol. 18, No. 2). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. What does the result suggest about the effectiveness of seat belts?

Interpreting Displays.

In Exercises 5 and 6, use the results from the given displays.

Testing Laboratory Gloves, The New York Times published an article about a study by Professor Denise Korniewicz, and Johns Hopkins researched subjected laboratory gloves to stress. Among 240 vinyl gloves, 63% leaked viruses; among 240 latex gloves, 7% leaked viruses. See the accompanying display of the Statdisk results. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that vinyl gloves have a greater virus leak rate than latex gloves.

Denomination Effect In the article “The Denomination Effect” by Priya Raghubir and Joydeep Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36, researchers reported results from studies conducted to determine whether people have different spending characteristics when they have larger bills, such as a \(20 bill, instead of smaller bills, such as twenty \)1 bills. In one trial, 89 undergraduate business students from two different colleges were randomly assigned to two different groups. In the “dollar bill” group, 46 subjects were given dollar bills; the “quarter” group consisted of 43 subjects given quarters. All subjects from both groups were given a choice of keeping the money or buying gum or mints. The article includes the claim that “money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to an equivalent amount in smaller denominations.” Test that claim using a 0.05 significance level with the following sample data from the study.

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as “less than 0.001,” what should we conclude about the original claim?

Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Hemoglobin

a. Exercise 2 includes a confidence interval. If you use the P-value method or the critical value method from Part 1 of this section to test the claim that women and men have the same mean hemoglobin levels, will the hypothesis tests and the confidence interval result in the same conclusion?

b. In general, if you conduct a hypothesis test using the methods of Part 1 of this section, will the P-value method, the critical value method, and the confidence interval method result in the same conclusion?

c. Assume that you want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean haemoglobin level in women is lessthan the mean hemoglobin level in men. What confidence level should be used if you want to test that claim using a confidence interval?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free