Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

Question:Headache Treatment In a study of treatments for very painful “cluster” headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from head- aches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from “High-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache,” by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 302, No. 22). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The null hypothesis is rejected; thus, there is sufficient evidence to claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

b. The 98% confidence interval is equal to\(\left( {0.467,0.687} \right)\).

c. Yes, the oxygen treatment is effective in curing cluster headaches.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A sample of 150 patients was treated with oxygen, and among them, 116 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment. Another sample of 148 patients was given a placebo, and among them, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment. The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.01\) .

02

Describe the hypotheses

It is claimed that oxygen treatment is effective; that is, the proportion of patients free from headache after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients free from headache after receiving a placebo.

Since the given claim does not have an equality sign, the following hypotheses are set up:

Null Hypothesis: The proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is equal to theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

\({H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\)

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after placebo treatment.

\({H_1}:{p_1} > {p_2}\)

The test is right-tailed.

03

Important values

Let \({\hat p_1}\) denote the sampleproportion of patients free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{{x_1}}}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{116}}{{150}}\\ = 0.7733\end{array}\)

Let\({\hat p_2}\) denote the sampleproportionof patients free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{{x_2}}}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{29}}{{148}}\\ = 0.1959\end{array}\)

The sample size of patients who weretreated with oxygen treatment\(\left( {{n_1}} \right)\)is equal to 150.

The sample size of patients who weretreated with a placebo\(\left( {{n_2}} \right)\)is equal to 148.

The value of the pooled sample proportion is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar p = \frac{{\left( {{x_1} + {x_2}} \right)}}{{\left( {{n_1} + {n_2}} \right)}}\,\\ = \frac{{\left( {116 + 29} \right)}}{{\left( {150 + 148} \right)}}\\ = 0.4866\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar q = 1 - \bar p\\ = 1 - 0.4866\\ = 0.5134\end{array}\)

04

Find the test statistic

The test statistic is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {0.7733 - 0.1959} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.4866 \times 0.5134}}{{150}} + \frac{{0.4866 \times 0.5134}}{{148}}} \right)} }}\\ = 9.971\end{array}\)

The value of the test statistic is 9.971.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the critical value of z corresponding to\(\alpha = 0.01\)for a right-tailed test is equal to 2.33.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding p-value is equal to 0.0001.

Since the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

Conclusion of the test

a.

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that theproportion of patients who were free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients who were free from headache 15 minutes after placebo treatment.

06

Find the confidence interval

b.

The general formula for the confidence interval of difference of proportion is written below:

\({\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E\,\,,\,\,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,...\left( 1 \right)\)\(\)

Where, E is the margin of error and has the following formula:

\(E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \)

For computing the confidence interval, first find the critical value\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\).

The confidence level is 98% if the level of significance used in the one-railed test is 0.01 (part a.).

Thus, the value of the level of significance for the confidence interval becomes\(\alpha = 0.02\).

Hence,

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{\alpha }{2} = \frac{{0.02}}{2}\\ = 0.01\end{array}\)

The value of\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)form the standard normal table is equal to 2.33.

Now, the margin of error (E) is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \\ = 2.33 \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.7733 \times 0.2267}}{{150}} + \frac{{0.1959 \times 0.8041}}{{148}}} \right)} \\ = 0.1101\end{array}\)

Substitute the value of E in equation (1) as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E\,\,,\,\,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\\ = \left( {\left( {0.7733 - 0.1959} \right) - 0.1101\,\,,\,\,\left( {0.7733 - 0.1959} \right) + 0.1101} \right)\\ = \left( {0.467,0.687} \right)\end{array}\)

Thus, the 98% confidence interval for the difference between two proportions is\(\left( {0.467,0.687} \right)\).

Since the confidence interval does not include the value of 0 and includes all positive values, it can be concluded that the proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

07

Effectiveness of the treatment

c.

From the results, it can be concluded thatthe oxygen treatment is effective because the proportion of patients free from headache after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients free from headache after receiving a placebo.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from “Bipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,” by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

A sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

Notation for the sample data given in exercise 1, consider the salk vaccine treatment group to be the first sample. Identify the values of n1,p^1,q^1,n2,p^2,q^2,p¯and q¯. Round all values so that they have six significant digits.

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of n1−1 and n2−1.)

Color and Cognition Researchers from the University of British Columbia conducted a study to investigate the effects of color on cognitive tasks. Words were displayed on a computer screen with background colors of red and blue. Results from scores on a test of word recall are given below. Higher scores correspond to greater word recall.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the samples are from populations with the same mean.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). What is it about the confidence interval that causes us to reach the same conclusion from part (a)?

c. Does the background color appear to have an effect on word recall scores? If so, which color appears to be associated with higher word memory recall scores?

Red Background n = 35, x = 15.89, s = 5.90

Blue Background n = 36, x = 12.31, s = 5.48

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\))

Regular Coke and Diet Coke Data Set 26 “Cola Weights and Volumes” in Appendix B includesweights (lb) of the contents of cans of Diet Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.78479 lb, s= 0.00439 lb) and of the contents of cans of regular Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.81682 lb, s= 0.00751 lb).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the contents of cans of Diet Coke have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for regular Coke.

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Can you explain why cans of Diet Coke would weigh less than cans of regular Coke?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free