Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn’t seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

First explore the two proportions of overtime wins. Does there appear to be a difference? If so, how?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The sample proportion of overtime wins before the rules were changed is equal to 0.548.

The sample proportion of overtime wins after the rules were changed is equal to 0.511.

There appears to be a difference in the two sample proportions of overtime wins. This implies that the change in the rules reduced the number of overtime wins that were previously won unfairly.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In the years between 1974 and 2011, out of 460 overtime games, 252 games were won by the team that won the coin toss.

In the first 3 years beginning from 2012, there were 47 overtime games, and 24 of those games were won by the team that won the coin toss.

02

Sample Proportions

The sample proportion of overtime wins before the rules were changed (between 1974 and 2011) is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_1} &= \frac{{{\rm{Number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{wins}}}}{{{\rm{Total}}\;{\rm{number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{games}}}}\\ &= \frac{{252}}{{460}}\\ &= 0.548\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the sample proportion of overtime wins between 1974 and 2011 is equal to 0.548.

The sample proportion of overtime wins after the rules were changed (in the first three years starting from 2012) is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_2} &= \frac{{{\rm{Number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{wins}}}}{{{\rm{Total}}\;{\rm{number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{games}}}}\\ &= \frac{{24}}{{47}}\\ &= 0.511\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the sample proportion of overtime wins after the rules were changed is equal to 0.511.

03

Comparison

There appears to be a difference in the two sample proportions of overtime wins.

This suggests that the change in the rules lowered the number of overtime wins that were previously won unfairly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Hemoglobin

a. Exercise 2 includes a confidence interval. If you use the P-value method or the critical value method from Part 1 of this section to test the claim that women and men have the same mean hemoglobin levels, will the hypothesis tests and the confidence interval result in the same conclusion?

b. In general, if you conduct a hypothesis test using the methods of Part 1 of this section, will the P-value method, the critical value method, and the confidence interval method result in the same conclusion?

c. Assume that you want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean haemoglobin level in women is lessthan the mean hemoglobin level in men. What confidence level should be used if you want to test that claim using a confidence interval?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Ground vs. Helicopter for Serious Injuries A study investigated rates of fatalities among patients with serious traumatic injuries. Among 61,909 patients transported by helicopter, 7813 died. Among 161,566 patients transported by ground services, 17,775 died (based on data from “Association Between Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults With Major Trauma,” by Galvagno et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 307, No. 15). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of fatalities is higher for patients transported by helicopter.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Considering the test results and the actual sample rates, is one mode of transportation better than the other? Are there other important factors to consider?

Confidence Interval for Haemoglobin

Large samples of women and men are obtained, and the haemoglobin level is measured in each subject. Here is the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two population means, where the measures from women correspond to population 1 and the measures from men correspond to population 2:\(\)\( - 1.76g/dL < {\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 1.62g/dL\).

a. What does the confidence interval suggest about equality of the mean hemoglobin level in women and the mean hemoglobin level in men?

b. Write a brief statement that interprets that confidence interval.

c. Express the confidence interval with measures from men being population 1 and measures from women being population 2.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Are Seat Belts Effective? A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed (based on data from “Who Wants Airbags?” by Meyer and Finney, Chance, Vol. 18, No. 2). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. What does the result suggest about the effectiveness of seat belts?

Find and interpret 95 % confidence interval for the proportion of all US adults who never clothes-shop online.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free