Does Aspirin Prevent Heart Disease? In a trial designed to test the effectiveness of aspirin in preventing heart disease, 11,037 male physicians were treated with aspirin and 11,034 male physicians were given placebos. Among the subjects in the aspirin treatment group, 139 experienced myocardial infarctions (heart attacks). Among the subjects given placebos, 239 experienced myocardial infarctions (based on data from “Final Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians’ Health Study,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 321: 129–135). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that aspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does aspirin appear to be effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Using the hypothesis test, it is concluded thatthere is sufficient evidence to reject the claim thataspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

b.Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to (-0.12, -0.006). As 0 does not lie within the interval, there is sufficient evidence to reject the claim thataspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

c. It can be said that aspirin is effective in reducing the risk of myocardial infarction.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A sample of 11,037 male physicians was treated with aspirin. Among them, 139 experienced myocardial infarctions. Another sample of 11,034 male physicians was given placebos. Among them, 239 experienced myocardial infarctions.

02

Describe the hypotheses

It is claimed that aspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

Null hypothesis: Theproportion of physicians who experienced myocardial infarctions after taking aspirin is equal to the proportion of physicians who experienced myocardial infarctions after taking the placebo.

H0:p1=p2

Alternative hypothesis: Theproportion of physicians who experienced myocardial infarctions after taking aspirin is not equal to the proportion of physicians who experienced myocardial infarctions after taking the placebo.

H1:p1p2

The test is two-tailed.

03

Important values

Let p^1denote the sampleproportionof physicians who experienced myocardial infarctions after taking aspirin.

p^1=13911037=0.0126

Let p^2denote the sample proportion of physicians who experienced myocardial infarctions after taking the placebo.

p^2=23911034=0.0217

The sample size of physicians who weretreated with aspirinn1 is equal to 11037.

The sample size of physicians who weretreated with a placebon2 is equal to 11034.

The value of the pooled sample proportion is computed as follows.

p¯=x1+x2n1+n2=139+23911037+11034=0.0171

.q¯=1-p¯=1-0.0171=0.9829

04

Find the test statistic

The test statistic is computed as follows.

z=p^1-p^2-p1-p2p¯q¯n1+p¯q¯n2=0.0126-0.0217-00.0171×0.982911037+0.0171×0.982911034=-5.1907

The value of the test statistic is -5.1907.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the critical value of z corresponding to α=0.05for a two-tailed test is equal to 1.96.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding p-value for z equal to -5.1907 is equal to 0.000.

As the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

Conclusion of the test

a.

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim thataspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

06

Find the confidence interval

b.

The general formula for the confidence interval of the difference of proportions is written below.

ConfidenceInterval=p^1-p^2-E,p^1-p^2+E...1

Here, E is the margin of error and has the following formula:

E=zα2×p^1×q^1n1+p^2×q^2n2

For computing the confidence interval, first, find the critical valuezα2.

Here, α=0.05.

Hence,

α2=0.052=0.025

The value of zα2from the standard normal table is equal to 1.96.

Now, the margin of error (E) is equal to

E=zα2×p^1×q^1n1+p^2×q^2n2=1.96×0.0126×0.987411037+0.0217×0.978311034=0.00342

.

Substitute the value of E in equation (1), as follows.

.ConfidenceInterval=p^1-p^2-E,p^1-p^2+E=0.0126-0.0217-0.00342,0.0126-0.0217+0.00342=-0.012,-0.006

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to (-0.12, -0.006).

07

Conclusion based on the confidence interval

The interval does not contain the value of 0 and contains all negative values.

This implies that the values of the two proportions cannot be equal.

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim thataspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

08

Effectiveness of aspirin

c.

As the confidence interval consists of negative values, the proportion of physicians who experienced myocardial infarctions after taking aspirin is less as compared to the physicians who took the placebo.

Therefore, it can be concluded that aspirin is effective in reducing the case of myocardial infarction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Denomination Effect A trial was conducted with 75 women in China given a 100-yuan bill, while another 75 women in China were given 100 yuan in the form of smaller bills (a 50-yuan bill plus two 20-yuan bills plus two 5-yuan bills). Among those given the single bill, 60 spent some or all of the money. Among those given the smaller bills, 68 spent some or all of the money (based on data from “The Denomination Effect,” by Raghubir and Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that when given a single large bill, a smaller proportion of women in China spend some or all of the money when compared to the proportion of women in China given the same amount in smaller bills.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. If the significance level is changed to 0.01, does the conclusion change?

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)Blanking Out on Tests Many students have had the unpleasant experience of panicking on a test because the first question was exceptionally difficult. The arrangement of test items was studied for its effect on anxiety. The following scores are measures of “debilitating test anxiety,” which most of us call panic or blanking out (based on data from “Item Arrangement, Cognitive Entry Characteristics, Sex and Test Anxiety as Predictors of Achievement in Examination Performance,” by Klimko, Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 52, No. 4.) Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the two populations of scores have different means? Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the test items has an effect on the score? Is the conclusion affected by whether the significance level is 0.05 or 0.01?

Questions Arranged from Easy to Difficult

24.64

39.29

16.32

32.83

28.02

33.31

20.60

21.13

26.69

28.9

26.43

24.23

7.10

32.86

21.06

28.89

28.71

31.73

30.02

21.96

25.49

38.81

27.85

30.29

30.72

Questions Arranged from Difficult to Easy

33.62

34.02

26.63

30.26

35.91

26.68

29.49

35.32

27.24

32.34

29.34

33.53

27.62

42.91

30.20

32.54

Braking Reaction Times: Boxplots Use the same data from Exercise 6 and use the same scale to construct a boxplot of the braking reaction times of males and another boxplot for the braking reaction times of females. What do the boxplots suggest?

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of \({n_1} - 1\) and \({n_2} - 1\).)

Second-Hand Smoke Data Set 12 “Passive and Active Smoke” in Appendix B includes cotinine levels measured in a group of nonsmokers exposed to tobacco smoke (n = 40, \(\bar x\) = 60.58 ng/mL, s = 138.08 ng/mL) and a group of nonsmokers not exposed to tobacco smoke (n = 40, \(\bar x\) = 16.35 ng/mL, s = 62.53 ng/mL). Cotinine is a metabolite of nicotine, meaning that when nicotine is absorbed by the body, cotinine is produced.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that nonsmokers exposed to tobacco smoke have a higher mean cotinine level than nonsmokers not exposed to tobacco smoke.

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What do you conclude about the effects of second-hand smoke?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free