Family Heights. In Exercises 1–5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Scatterplot Construct a scatterplot of the father/son heights, then interpret it.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The scatterplot is shown below:

There is no relationship between the height of the father and the son.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The heights of three members of a family are studied.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

02

Steps to sketch a scatterplot

A scatterplot is sketched for paired values in the dataset where one value is scaled corresponding to the variable on the horizontal axis and the other corresponding to the vertical axis.

Steps to sketch a scatterplot:

  1. Mark two axis; horizontal for the father's height and vertical for the son’s height.
  2. Mark the coordinates of height for two variables on the plot.

The resultant scatterplot is shown below.

03

Interpret the plot

From this scatterplot, thefollowing observations are made:

  • The dots do not follow any specific pattern.
  • The dots are clusters in the range of 68 to 72 inches vertically.

Thus, it can be inferred that there is no association between the heights of the father and the son.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Bednets to Reduce Malaria In a randomized controlled trial in Kenya, insecticide-treated bednets were tested as a way to reduce malaria. Among 343 infants using bednets, 15 developed malaria. Among 294 infants not using bednets, 27 developed malaria (based on data from “Sustainability of Reductions in Malaria Transmission and Infant Mortality in Western Kenya with Use of Insecticide-Treated Bed nets,” by Lind blade et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 21). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bed nets.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, do the bed nets appear to be effective?

Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn’t seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

First explore the two proportions of overtime wins. Does there appear to be a difference? If so, how?

Are Flights Cheaper When Scheduled Earlier? Listed below are the costs (in dollars) of flights from New York (JFK) to Los Angeles (LAX). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that flights scheduled one day in advance cost more than flights scheduled 30 days in advance. What strategy appears to be effective in saving money when flying?

Delta

Jet Blue

American

Virgin

Alaska

United

1 day in advance

501

634

633

646

633

642

30 days in advance

148

149

156

156

252

313

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent random samples selected from normally distributed populations. Do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of n1−1 and n2−1).

Are male and female professors rated differently? According to Data Set 17 “Course Evaluations” Appendix B, given below are student evaluation scores of female professors and male professors. The test claims that female and male professors have the same mean evaluation ratings. Does there appear to be a difference?

Females

4.4

3.4

4.8

2.9

4.4

4.9

3.5

3.7

3.4

4.8

Males

4.0

3.6

4.1

4.1

3.5

4.6

4.0

4.3

4.5

4.3

Equivalence of Hypothesis Test and Confidence Interval Two different simple random samples are drawn from two different populations. The first sample consists of 20 people with 10 having a common attribute. The second sample consists of 2000 people with 1404 of them having the same common attribute. Compare the results from a hypothesis test of \({p_1} = {p_2}\) (with a 0.05 significance level) and a 95% confidence interval estimate of \({p_1} - {p_2}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free