In Exercises 1–5, use the following survey results: Randomly selected subjects were asked if they were aware that the Earth has lost half of its wildlife population during the past 50 years. Among 1121 women, 23% said that they were aware. Among 1084 men, 26% said that they were aware (based on data from a Harris poll).

Biodiversity When testing the claim that\({p_1} = {p_2}\), a test statistic of z = -1.64 is obtained. Find the P-value for the hypothesis test.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The p-value is equal to 0.1010.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In a sample of 1121 women, 23% said that they were aware of the fact that the Earth has lost half of its wildlife population during the past 50 years. In another sample of 1084 men, 26% said that they were aware that the Earth had lost half of its wildlife population during the past 50 years. It is claimed that the two population proportions are equal.

02

Find the p-value

The given claim has an equality sign. This implies that the alternative hypothesis for testing the claim will be as follows:

Alternate Hypothesis: The proportion of women who were aware of the fact is not equal tothe proportion of men who were aware of the given fact.

Symbolically,

\({H_1}:{p_1} \ne {\rm{ }}{p_2}\)

Since there is an unequal sign in the alternative hypothesis, the test is two-tailed.

The value of the test statistic is equal to -1.64.

The two-tailed p-value for the test statistic value equal to -1.64 has the following expression:

\(P\left( {z < - 1.64} \right) + P\left( {z > 1.64} \right)\)

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the left-tailed p-value when the z-score is equal to -1.64 is equal to 0.0505.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the left-tailed p-value when the z-score is equal to -1.64 is equal to 0.0505.

Thus, the p-value becomes:

\(\begin{array}{c}P\left( {z < - 1.64} \right) + P\left( {z > 1.64} \right) = 0.0505 + 0.0505\\ = 0.1010\end{array}\)

Therefore, the p-value is equal to 0.1010.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Eyewitness Accuracy of Police Does stress affect the recall ability of police eyewitnesses? This issue was studied in an experiment that tested eyewitness memory a week after a nonstressful interrogation of a cooperative suspect and a stressful interrogation of an uncooperative and belligerent suspect. The numbers of details recalled a week after the incident were recorded, and the summary statistics are given below (based on data from “Eyewitness Memory of Police Trainees for Realistic Role Plays,” by Yuille et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 6). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim in the article that “stress decreases the amount recalled.”

Nonstress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 53.3, s = 11.6

Stress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 45.3, s = 13.2

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from “Bipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,” by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Tennis Challenges Since the Hawk-Eye instant replay system for tennis was introduced at the U.S. Open in 2006, men challenged 2441 referee calls, with the result that 1027 of the calls were overturned. Women challenged 1273 referee calls, and 509 of the calls were overturned. We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does it appear that men and women have equal success in challenging calls?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Lefties In a random sample of males, it was found that 23 write with their left hands and 217 do not. In a random sample of females, it was found that 65 write with their left hands and 455 do not (based on data from “The Left-Handed: Their Sinister History,” by ElaineFowler Costas, Education Resources Information Center, Paper 399519). We want to use a 0.01significance level to test the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the rate of left-handedness among males less than the rate of left-handedness among females?

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

Seat Belts A study of seat belt use involved children who were hospitalized after motor vehicle crashes. For a group of 123 children who were wearing seat belts, the number of days in intensive care units (ICU) has a mean of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 1.77. For a group of 290 children who were not wearing seat belts, the number of days spent in ICUs has a mean of 1.39 and a standard deviation of 3.06 (based on data from “Morbidity Among Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Victims: The Effectiveness of Seat Belts,” by Osberg and Di Scala, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that children wearing seat belts have a lower mean length of time in an ICU than the mean for children not wearing seat belts.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What important conclusion do the results suggest?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free