Family Heights. In Exercises 1–5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Confidence Interval Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean height of sons. Write a brief statement that interprets the confidence interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The 95% confidence interval estimate is between 67.6 in and 71.9 in.

There is 95% confidence that the true value of the mean for the population mean of the height of sons would fall between 67.6 in and 71.9 in.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The heights of three members of families are studied.

The data of son’s height is given as follows:

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

02

Identify the formula to calculate the 95% confidence interval of thepopulation mean

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is

\(\bar x - E < \mu < \bar x + E\).

Here,\(\bar x\)isthe sample mean, and E is the margin of error.

03

Determine the statistic measures from the sample points

For 8 (n) samples, the sample mean is calculated below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\bar x &= \frac{{\sum {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{71 + 64 + ... + 71}}{8}\\ &= 69.7\;{\rm{in}}\end{aligned}\)

The sample standard deviation is calculated below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}s &= \sqrt {\frac{{\sum {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ &= \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {71 - 69.7} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {64 - 69.7} \right)}^2} + ... + {{\left( {71 - 69.7} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}} \\ &= 2.57\;{\rm{in}}{\rm{.}}\end{aligned}\)

04

Obtain the confidence interval

The 95% confidence level implies a 0.05 significance level.

The degree of freedom is

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= n - 1\\ &= 8 - 1\\ &= 7.\end{aligned}\)

The critical value of 2.364 is obtained from the t-distribution table at 7 degrees of freedomand 0.05 significance level.

The margin of error is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} E &= {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \frac{s}{{\sqrt n }}\\ &= 2.364 \times \frac{{2.57}}{{\sqrt 8 }}\\ &= 2.14\\ &\approx 2.1\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is as calculated below:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\bar x - E < \mu < \bar x + E &= 69.7 - 2.1 < \mu < 69.7 + 2.1\\\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; &= 67.6 < \mu < 71.9\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the mean height of sons is (67.6 in, 71.9 in).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assessing Normality Interpret the normal quantile plot of heights of fathers.

Notation for the sample data given in exercise 1, consider the salk vaccine treatment group to be the first sample. Identify the values of n1,p^1,q^1,n2,p^2,q^2,p¯and q¯. Round all values so that they have six significant digits.

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).) Is Old Faithful Not Quite So Faithful? Listed below are time intervals (min) between eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser. The “recent” times are within the past few years, and the “past” times are from 1995. Does it appear that the mean time interval has changed? Is the conclusion affected by whether the significance level is 0.05 or 0.01?

Recent

78

91

89

79

57

100

62

87

70

88

82

83

56

81

74

102

61

Past

89

88

97

98

64

85

85

96

87

95

90

95

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from “Bipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,” by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

Before/After Treatment Results Captopril is a drug designed to lower systolic blood pressure. When subjects were treated with this drug, their systolic blood pressure readings (in mm Hg) were measured before and after the drug was taken. Results are given in the accompanying table (based on data from “Essential Hypertension: Effect of an Oral Inhibitor of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme,” by MacGregor et al., British Medical Journal, Vol. 2). Using a 0.01 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that captopril is effective in lowering systolic blood pressure?

Subject

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

Before

200

174

198

170

179

182

193

209

185

155

169

210

After

191

170

177

167

159

151

176

183

159

145

146

177

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free