Heights Use a 0.01 significance level with the sample data from Exercise 3 to test the claim that women have heights with a mean that is less than the mean height of men.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude that the mean height of women is less than the mean height of men.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The heights of women and men (in cm) are tabulated.

02

Step 2:Hypotheses

It is claimed that the mean height of women is less than the mean height of men.

Corresponding to the given claim, the following hypotheses are set up:

Null Hypothesis: The mean height of women is equal to the mean height of men.

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\)

Alternative Hypothesis: The mean height of women is less than the mean height of men.

\({H_1}:{\mu _1} < {\mu _2}\)

The test is left-tailed.

03

Important values

The sample size for the heights of women is equal to\({n_1} = 10\).

The sample size for the heights of men is equal to\({n_2} = 10\).

The sample mean height of women is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} {{\bar x}_1} &= \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{x_{1i}}} }}{{{n_1}}}\\ &= \frac{{160.3 + 167.7 + ...... + 171.1}}{{10}}\\ &= 162.35\end{aligned}\)

The sample mean height of men is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} {{\bar x}_2} &= \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{x_{2i}}} }}{{{n_2}}}\\ &= \frac{{190.3 + 169.8 + ...... + 181.3}}{{10}}\\ &= 178.77\end{aligned}\)

The sample variance of heights of women is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} s_1^2 &= \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{{({x_{1i}} - {{\bar x}_1})}^2}} }}{{{n_1} - 1}}\\ &= \frac{{{{\left( {160.3 - 162.35} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {167.7 - 162.35} \right)}^2} + ....... + {{\left( {166.9 - 162.35} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}\\ &= 140.35\end{aligned}\)

The sample variance of heights of men is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} s_2^2 &= \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{{({x_{2i}} - {{\bar x}_2})}^2}} }}{{{n_2} - 1}}\\ &= \frac{{{{\left( {190.3 - 178.77} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {169.8 - 178.77} \right)}^2} + ....... + {{\left( {181.3 - 178.77} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}\\ &= 28.11\end{aligned}\)

The following values are obtained from the previous exercise:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 162.35\\{{\bar x}_2} = 178.77\\{n_1} = 10\\{n_2} = 10\\s_1^2 = 140.35\\s_2^2 = 28.11\end{array}\)

04

Calculate test statistic, critical value and p-value

The test statistic value is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} t &= \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\;\;\;{\rm{where}}\;{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\;is\;0\\ &= \frac{{\left( {162.35 - 178.77} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{140.35}}{{10}} + \frac{{28.11}}{{10}}} }}\\ &= - 4.001\end{aligned}\)

The confidence level is equal to 95%.Thus, the corresponding level of significance is equal to 0.05.

The degrees of freedom are computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} df &= {\rm{smaller}}\;of\;\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)\;{\rm{and}}\;\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)\\ &= {\rm{smaller}}\;of\;\left( {10 - 1} \right)\;{\rm{and}}\;\left( {10 - 1} \right)\\ &= 9\end{aligned}\)

Referring to t-table, the critical value of t for\(\alpha = 0.01\)and 9 degrees of freedom for a left-tailed test is equal to –2.8214.

Referring to t-table, the corresponding p-value is equal to 0.0016 which is obtained by using the test statistic (–4.001).

Since the test statistic (–4.001) is less than the critical value (–2.8214) and the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of n1−1 and n2−1.)Color and Creativity Researchers from the University of British Columbia conducted trials to investigate the effects of color on creativity. Subjects with a red background were asked to think of creative uses for a brick; other subjects with a blue background were given the same task. Responses were scored by a panel of judges and results from scores of creativity are given below. Higher scores correspond to more creativity. The researchers make the claim that “blue enhances performance on a creative task.”

a. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that blue enhances performance on a creative task. b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). What is it about the confidence interval that causes us to reach the same conclusion from part (a)?Red Background: n = 35, x = 3.39, s = 0.97Blue Background: n = 36, x = 3.97, s = 0.63

Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn’t seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

First explore the two proportions of overtime wins. Does there appear to be a difference? If so, how?

Degrees of FreedomIn Exercise 20 “Blanking Out on Tests,” using the “smaller of\({n_1} - 1\) and \({n_2} - 1\)” for the number of degrees of freedom results in df = 15. Find the number of degrees of freedom using Formula 9-1. In general, how are hypothesis tests and confidence intervals affected by using Formula 9-1 instead of the “smaller of \({n_1} - 1\)and \({n_2} - 1\)”?

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from “Bipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,” by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

Interpreting Displays.

In Exercises 5 and 6, use the results from the given displays.

Testing Laboratory Gloves, The New York Times published an article about a study by Professor Denise Korniewicz, and Johns Hopkins researched subjected laboratory gloves to stress. Among 240 vinyl gloves, 63% leaked viruses; among 240 latex gloves, 7% leaked viruses. See the accompanying display of the Statdisk results. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that vinyl gloves have a greater virus leak rate than latex gloves.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free