Correlation. One study showed that for a recent period of 11 years, there was a strong correlation (or association) between the numbers of people who drowned in swimming pools and the amounts of power generated by nuclear power plants (based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Energy). Does this imply that increasing power from nuclear power plants is the cause of more deaths in swimming pools? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

If there is a correlation between two variables, it may not imply that one causes the other.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two variables show a strong correlation:

  • The counts for the individuals who drowned in the pools
  • The amount of power a nuclear plant generates
02

Explain if the increasing power from nuclear plants causes more deaths in a pool.

No, the increasing power in nuclear plants is not the cause of death by drowning in a swimming pool.

A strong correlation means that the recorded data for the two variables has a statistically strong value of correlation coefficient, which is close to ‑1 or 1.

However, a strong correlation between two variables does not imply that one variable causes the other to happen because correlation does not imply causation. This is because the relationship in such cases may not be direct, and there might be some lurking variables that may cause the strong relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Health SurveyIn a survey of 1020 adults in the United States, 44% said that they wash their hands after riding public transportation (based on data from KRC Research).

a. Identify the sample and population.

b. Is the value of 44% a statistic or parameter?

c. What is the level of measurement of the value of 44%? (nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio)

d. Are the numbers of subjects in such surveys discrete or continuous?

In Exercises 21–24, refer to the data in the table below. The entries are white blood cell counts (1000 cells,ML) and red blood cell counts (million cells,ML) from male subjects examined as part of a large health study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. The data are matched, so that the first subject has a white blood cell count of 8.7 and a red blood cell count of 4.91, and so on.

Subject


12345
White8.75.97.36.25.9
Red4.915.594.444.85.17

Given the context of the data in the table, what issue can be addressed by conducting a statistical analysis of the measurements?

Question: Statistical Significance versus Practical Significance. When testing a new treatment, what is the difference between statistical significance and practical significance? Can a treatment have statistical significance but not practical significance?

Identify whether the given value is a statistic or a parameter.

Birth Weight In a study of 400 babies born at four different hospitals in New York State, it was found that the average (mean) weight at birth was 3152.0 grams.

What’s Wrong? In Exercises 25–28, identify what is wrong.

The electronic cigarette maker V2 Cigs sponsored a poll showing that 55% of

smokers surveyed say that they feel ostracized “sometimes,” “often,” or “always.”

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free