Determine whether the given source has the potential to create bias in a statistical study.

Arsenic in Rice. Amounts of arsenic in samples of rice grown in Texas were measured by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Short Answer

Expert verified

No, there is no potential for bias in the study.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The organization involved in the study is Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The FDA took rice samples and detected the content of arsenic in them.

02

Explain the bias at the source

No, there is no possibility of bias in the study.

FDA-approved methods are being used in the research of arsenic in rice. The samples are supposed to be devoid of bias.

The poll is being conducted by a government body that oversees food standards in the United States and provides other human services. Since the organization promotes public health, it can be relied on for a bias-free collection of observations to produce trustworthy and accurate results.

Thus, there is no potential for creating bias in the study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 17–20, refer to the sample of body temperatures (degrees Fahrenheit) in the table below. (The body temperatures are from a data set in Appendix B.).

Subject


12345
8 AM9798.597.697.798.7
12 AM97.697.89898.498.4

Conclusion If we analyze the listed body temperatures with suitable methods of statistics, we conclude that when the differences are found between the 8 AM body temperatures and the 12 AM body temperatures, there is a 64% chance that the differences can be explained by random results obtained from populations that have the same 8 AM and 12 AM body temperatures. What should we conclude about the statistical significance of those differences?

Determine whether the sampling method appears to be sound or is flawed.

Clinical Trials. Researchers at Yale University conduct a wide variety of clinical trials by using subjects who volunteer after reading advertisements soliciting paid volunteers.

In Exercises 29–36, answer the given questions, which are related to percentages.

Workplace Attire In a survey conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, 1000 adults were asked to identify “what is inappropriate in the workplace.” Of the 1000 subjects, 70% said that miniskirts were not appropriate in the workplace.

a. What is 70% of 1000?

b. Among the 1000 respondents, 550 said that shorts are unacceptable in the workplace. What percentage of respondents said that shorts are unacceptable in the workplace?

In Exercises 17–20, refer to the sample of body temperatures (degrees Fahrenheit) in the table below. (The body temperatures are from a data set in Appendix B.)

Source: The listed body temperatures were obtained from Dr. Steven Wasserman, Dr. Philip Mackowiak, and Dr. Myron Levine, who were researchers at the University of Maryland. Is the source of the data likely to be biased?

Falsifying Data A researcher at the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Research Center was once criticized for falsifying data. Among his data were figures obtained from 6 groups of mice, with 20 individual mice in each group. The following values were given for the percentage of successes in each group: 53%, 58%, 63%, 46%, 48%, 67%. What’s wrong with those values?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free