Student Evaluations of Professors Use the sample data given in Exercise 1 and test the claim that evaluation ratings of female professors have the same median as evaluation ratings of male professors. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the median values between the evaluation ratings of male and female professors.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples show the evaluation ratings of female and male professors.

The significance level is 0.05.

02

Identify the hypotheses

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test is performed to test the difference betweenthe medians of the given samples.

The null hypothesis is as follows:

There is no difference in the median values of the evaluation ratings for female and male professors.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

There is a difference in the median values of the evaluation ratings for female and male professors.

It is a two-tailed test.

03

Assign ranks to the values after combining the samples

The ranks are computed by combining the two samples and tagging each observation with the sample name/number it comes from.

Rank 1 is assigned to the smallest observation; rank 2 is assigned to the next smallest observation, and soon until the largest value.

If the two or more observations have the same value, then theaverage (or mean) of the ranks is assigned to them.

The following table shows the ranks:

Student Evaluation

Sample Name

Ranks

3.9

F

11.5

3.4

F

4

3.7

F

8.5

4.1

F

14.5

3.7

F

8.5

3.5

F

6

4.4

F

21

3.4

F

4

4.8

F

24

4.1

F

14.5

2.3

F

1

4.2

F

17.5

3.6

F

7

4.4

F

21

3.8

M

10

3.4

M

4

4.9

M

25.5

4.1

M

14.5

3.2

M

2

4.2

M

17.5

3.9

M

11.5

4.9

M

25.5

4.7

M

23

4.4

M

21

4.3

M

19

4.1

M

14.5

04

Calculate the sum of the ranks

Compute the sum of ranks of females as shown below:

\(11.5 + 4 + 8.5 + .... + 21 = 163\)

Compute the sum of ranks ofmales as shown:

\(10 + 4 + 25.5 + .... + 14.5 = 188\)

Thus, the sum of the ranks offemales is 163 and is denoted by R.

05

Calculate the mean and the standard deviation

Let \({n_1}\) be the sample sizeoffemale professors.

Let \({n_2}\) be the sample sizeofmale professors.

Here,

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 14\\{n_2} = 12\end{array}\)

Compute the mean value \(\left( {{\mu _R}} \right)\).

\(\begin{array}{c}{\mu _R} = \frac{{{n_1}\left( {{n_1} + {n_2} + 1} \right)}}{2}\\ = \frac{{14\left( {14 + 12 + 1} \right)}}{2}\\ = 189\end{array}\)

Compute the standard deviation \(\left( {{\sigma _R}} \right)\).

\(\begin{array}{c}{\sigma _R} = \sqrt {\frac{{{n_1}{n_2}\left( {{n_1} + {n_2} + 1} \right)}}{{12}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{14 \times 12\left( {14 + 12 + 1} \right)}}{{12}}} \\ = 19.44\end{array}\)

06

Calculate the test statistic

The test statistic is obtained as shown below:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{R - {\mu _R}}}{{{\sigma _R}}}\; \sim N\left( {0,1} \right)\\ = \frac{{163 - 189}}{{19.44}}\\ = - 1.34\end{array}\)

Thus, the absolute value of the z-score is 1.34.

07

Determine the critical value andthe conclusion of the test

The critical value of z from the standard normal table for a two-tailed test, with \(\alpha = 0.05\), is 1.96.

As the test statistic value is less than the critical value, the null hypothesis fails to reject.

There is not enough evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the median values between the evaluation ratings of male and female professors. In other words, there is not enough evidence to reject the claim that the median values of the evaluation ratings for female and male professors are the same.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Foot Length , Height For the sample data given in Exercise 4, identify at least one advantage of using the appropriate non-parametric test over the parametric test.

Ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors Listed below are ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors at the times they won Oscars (from Data Set 14 “Oscar Winner Age” in Appendix B). Do these data suggest that there is a correlation between ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors?

Actress

61

32

33

45

29

62

22

44

54

Actor

45

50

48

60

50

39

55

44

33

In Exercises 1–4, use the following sequence of political party affiliations of recent presidents of the United States, where R represents Republican and D represents Democrat.

R R RR D R D R RR D R RR D D R D D R R D R R D R D

Testing for Bias Can the runs test be used to show the proportion of Republicans is significantly greater than the proportion of Democrats?

Regression If the methods of this section are used with paired sample data, and the conclusion is that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a correlation between the two variables, can we use the methods of Section 10-2 to find the regression equation that can be used for predictions? Why or why not?

Foot Length , Height Listed below are foot lengths (cm) and heights (cm) of males from Data Set 2 “Foot and Height” in Appendix B. Which method of nonparametric statistics should be used? What characteristic of the data is investigated with this test?

Foot Length 27.8 25.7 26.7 25.9 26.4 29.2 26.8 28.1 25.4 27.9

Height 180.3 175.3 184.8 177.8 182.3 185.4 180.3 175.3 177.8 185.4

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free