Radiation in Baby Teeth Listed below are amounts of strontium-90 (in millibecquerels, or mBq, per gram of calcium) in a simple random sample of baby teeth obtained from Pennsylvania residents and New York residents born after 1979 (based on data from “An Unexpected Rise in Strontium-90 in U.S. Deciduous Teeth in the 1990s,” by Mangano et al., Science of the Total Environment). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the median amount of strontium-90 from Pennsylvania residents is the same as the median from New York residents.

Pennsylvania

155

142

149

130

151

163

151

142

156

133

138

161

New York

133

140

142

131

134

129

128

140

140

140

137

143

Short Answer

Expert verified

There isenough evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the median values of the amount of strontium in baby teeth between the cities of Pennsylvania and New York.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples show the amount of strontium (in millibecquerels) of baby teeth of two cities—Pennsylvania and New York.

02

Frame the hypotheses

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test is performed to test the difference in the medians of the given samples.

The null hypothesis is as follows:

There is no difference in the median values of the amount of strontium in baby teeth in the two cities.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

There is a difference in the median values of the amount of strontium in baby teeth in the two cities.

It is a two-tailed test.

03

Assigning ranks to the observations

The ranks are computed by combining the two samples and tagging each observation with the sample name/number it comes from. Here, the city name/ sample name is tagged with ranks. Let “P” indicate the residents ofPennsylvania and “N”indicatethe residents of New York.

The lowest observation is assigned rank1; the second-lowest observation is assigned rank 2, and so on.

If at least two observations have the same value, the mean of the ranks is assigned to them.

The following table shows the ranks:

Amount of Strontium

Sample Type

Ranks

155

P

21

142

P

15

149

P

18

130

P

3

151

P

19.5

163

P

24

151

P

19.5

142

P

15

156

P

22

133

P

5.5

138

P

9

161

P

23

133

N

5.5

140

N

11.5

142

N

15

131

N

4

134

N

7

129

N

2

128

N

1

140

N

11.5

140

N

11.5

140

N

11.5

137

N

8

143

N

17

04

Compute the sum of the ranks

Compute the sum of ranks for Pennsylvania.

\(21 + 15 + 18 + .... + 17 = 194.5\)

Thus, the sum of the ranks for Pennsylvania is 194.5 and is denoted by R.

05

Compute the mean and the standard deviation

Let \({n_1}\) be the sample size for Pennsylvania.

Let \({n_2}\) be the sample size for New York.

Here,

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 12\\{n_2} = 12\end{array}\)

Compute the mean value \(\left( {{\mu _R}} \right)\).

\(\begin{array}{c}{\mu _R} = \frac{{{n_1}\left( {{n_1} + {n_2} + 1} \right)}}{2}\\ = \frac{{12\left( {12 + 12 + 1} \right)}}{2}\\ = 150\end{array}\)

Compute the standard deviation \(\left( {{\sigma _R}} \right)\).

\(\begin{array}{c}{\sigma _R} = \sqrt {\frac{{{n_1}{n_2}\left( {{n_1} + {n_2} + 1} \right)}}{{12}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{12 \times 12\left( {12 + 12 + 1} \right)}}{{12}}} \\ = 17.32\end{array}\)

06

Calculate the test statistic

The test statistic is calculated below:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{R - {\mu _R}}}{{{\sigma _R}}}\\ = \frac{{194.5 - 150}}{{17.32}}\\ = 2.57\end{array}\)

The absolute value of the z-score is 2.57.

07

Determine the critical value and the conclusion of the test

The critical value of z from the standard normal table for a two-tailed test with \(\alpha = 0.05\) is equal to 1.96.

As the test statistic value is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There isenough evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the median values of the amount of strontium in baby teeth between the cities of Pennsylvania and New York.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which Test? Three different judges give the same singers ratings on a scale of 0 to 10. What method of this chapter can be used to determine whether one of the judges is tougher or more lenient than the others, as indicated by a median rating that is significantly different from the others?

Identifying Signs For the sign test described in Exercise 1, identify the number of positive signs, the number of negative signs, the number of ties, the sample size n that is used for the sign test, and the value of the test statistic.

Regression If the methods of this section are used with paired sample data, and the conclusion is that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a correlation between the two variables, can we use the methods of Section 10-2 to find the regression equation that can be used for predictions? Why or why not?

Blanking Out on Tests In a study of students blanking out on tests, the arrangement of test items was studied for its effect on anxiety. The following scores are measures of “debilitating test anxiety” (based on data from “Item Arrangement, Cognitive Entry Characteristics, Sex and Test Anxiety as Predictors of Achievement in Examination Performance,” by Klimko, Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 52, No. 4.) Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the two samples are from populations with different medians? Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the test items has an effect on the score? Use a 0.01 significance level.

Questions Arranged From Easy To Difficult

24.64

39.29

16.32

32.83

28.02

33.31

20.6

21.13

26.69

28.9

26.43

24.23

7.1

32.86

21.06

28.89

28.71

31.73

30.02

21.96

25.49

38.81

27.85

30.29

30.72

Questions Arranged From Difficult To Easy

33.62

34.02

26.63

30.26

35.91

26.68

29.49

35.32

27.24

32.34

29.34

33.53

27.62

42.91

30.2

32.54

Pizza and the Subway The “pizza connection” is the principle that the price of a slice of pizza in New York City is always about the same as the subway fare. Use the data listed below to determine whether there is a correlation between the cost of a slice of pizza and the subway fare.

Year

1960

1973

1986

1995

2002

2003

2009

2013

2015

Pizza Cost

0.15

0.35

1.00

1.25

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.3

2.75

Subway Fare

0.15

0.35

1.00

1.35

1.5

2.00

2.25

2.5

2.75

CPI

30.2

48.3

112.3

162.2

191.9

197.8

214.5

233

237.2

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free