Using Nonparametric Tests. In Exercises 1–10, use a 0.05 significance level with the indicated test. If no particular test is specified, use the appropriate nonparametric test from this chapter.

Airline Fares Listed below are the costs (in dollars) of eight different flights from New York (JFK) to San Francisco for Virgin America, US Airways, United Airlines, JetBlue, Delta, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and Sun Country Airlines. (Each pair of costs is for the same flight.) Use the sign test to test the claim that there is no difference in cost between flights scheduled 1 day in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance. What appears to be a wise scheduling strategy?

Flight scheduled one day in advance

584

490

584

584

584

606

628

717

Flight scheduled 30 days in advance

254

308

244

229

284

509

394

258

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to reject the claim that there is no difference in the costs of flights between those scheduled one day in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

A wise scheduling strategy would be to buy the flight tickets 30 days in advance.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples show the airfares of eight different flights from New York to San Francisco.

02

Identify the hypothesis of the test

The sign test examinesthe claim that there is no difference in the cost between flights scheduled oneday prior and flights scheduled 30 days before.

The null hypothesis is as follows:

There is no difference in the cost between flights scheduled oneday in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

There is no difference in the cost between flights scheduled oneday in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

03

Assign the sign of difference

Assign a negative sign to the difference if the cost corresponding to sample 1 (flights scheduled oneday in advance) is less than the cost corresponding to sample 2 (flights scheduled 30 days in advance).

Assign a positive sign to the difference if the cost corresponding to sample 1 (flights scheduled one day in advance) is greater than the cost corresponding to sample 2 (flights scheduled 30 days in advance).

The following table shows the sign of differences:

Flight scheduled one day in advance

584

490

584

584

584

606

628

717

Flight scheduled 30 days in advance

254

308

244

229

284

509

394

258

Sign of Difference

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

04

Calculate the test statistic

The total number of observations (n) is 8.

Since \(n \le 25\), the value of the test statistic (x) needs to be determined.

The number of times the positive sign occurs is 8.

The number of times the negative sign occurs is 0.

Here, the less frequent sign is the negative sign.

Thus, the test statistic (x) is the number of times the less frequent sign occurs, which is equal to 0.

05

Determine the conclusion of the test

The critical value of x for n=8 and \(\alpha = 0.05\) for a two-tailed test is 0.

Since the value of the test statistic is equal to the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to reject the claim that there is nodifference in the costs of flights between those scheduled one day in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

06

Appropriate scheduling strategy

As all of the eight air fares are higher for a flight scheduled oneday in advance than the flights scheduled 30 days in advance, it would be wise to schedule the flight 30 days in advance to save the extra cost.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Nominal Data. In Exercises 9–12, use the sign test for the claim involving nominal data.

Births A random sample of 860 births in New York State included 426 boys and 434 girls. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that when babies are born, boys and girls are equally likely.

Testing for Rank Correlation. In Exercises 7–12, use the rank correlation coefficient to test for a correlation between the two variables. Use a significance level of\(\alpha \)= 0.05.

Chocolate and Nobel Prizes The table below lists chocolate consumption (kg per capita) and the numbers of Nobel Laureates (per 10 million people) for several different countries (from Data Set 16 in Appendix B). Is there a correlation between chocolate consumption and the rate of Nobel Laureates? How could such a correlation be explained?

Chocolate

11.6

2.5

8.8

3.7

1.8

4.5

9.4

3.6

2

3.6

6.4

Nobel

12.7

1.9

12.7

3.3

1.5

11.4

25.5

3.1

1.9

1.7

31.9

Contradicting H1 An important step in conducting the sign test is to determine whether the sample data contradict the alternative hypothesis H1. For the sign test described in Exercise 1, identify the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis, and explain how the sample data contradict or do not contradict the alternative hypothesis.

Body Temperatures For the matched pairs listed in Exercise 1, identify the following components used in the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test:

a. Differences d

b. The ranks corresponding to the nonzero values of | d |

c. The signed-ranks

d. The sum of the positive ranks and the sum of the absolute values of the negative ranks

e. The value of the test statistic T

f. The critical value of T (assuming a 0.05 significance level in a test of no difference between body temperatures at 8 AM and 12 AM)

Using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. In Exercises 5–8, use the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Car Crash Measurements Use the following listed chest deceleration measurements (in g, where g is the force of gravity) from samples of small, midsize, and large cars. (These values are from Data Set 19 “Car Crash Tests” in Appendix B.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the different size categories have the same median chest deceleration in the standard crash test. Do the data suggest that larger cars are safer?

Small

44

39

37

54

39

44

42

Midsize

36

53

43

42

52

49

41

Large

32

45

41

38

37

38

33

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free