Fear of Heights Among readers of a USA Today website, 285 chose to respond to this posted question: “Are you afraid of heights in tall buildings?” Among those who chose to respond, 46% answered “yes” and 54% answered “no.” Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the majority of the population is not afraid of heights in tall buildings. What is wrong with this hypothesis test?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that most of the population is not afraid of heights in tall buildings.

The sample is a voluntary response sample,so the test results may not be reliable.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In a sample size of 285 respondents, 46% said they were afraid of heights in tall buildings, while 54% said that they were not.

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample size (n) is 285.

02

Identify the hypothesis

The z-test is used to test whether the given proportion is equal to the hypothesized value.

The null hypothesis is as follows:

An equalproportion of respondents answered “yes” and “no” to the question.

\({H_0}:p = 0.5\)

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The proportion of respondents whoanswered “no” is greater than the proportion of respondents who responded “yes”.

\({H_1}:p > 0.5\)

It is a right-tailed test.

03

Test statistic

Here, pis the proportion of people who responded “no”. Thus, p=0.50.

And

\(\begin{array}{c}q = 1 - p\\ = 1 - 0.50\\ = 0.50.\end{array}\)

The estimated value of p is shown below:

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat p = 54\% \\ = \frac{{54}}{{100}}\\ = 0.54\end{array}\)

The sample size (n) is 285.

The value of the test statistic is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\hat p - p}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{pq}}{n}} }}\\ = \frac{{0.54 - 0.50}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.50\left( {1 - 0.50} \right)}}{{285}}} }}\\ = 1.35\end{array}\)

The value of the z score is 1.35.

The critical value of z at \(\alpha = 0.05\) for a right-tailed test is 1.645.

Since the test statistic value is less than the critical value, the null hypothesis fails to reject.

04

Conclusion

There is not enough evidence to conclude that most of the population is afraid of heights in tall buildings.

05

Pitfall of the test

Because respondents decided to answer, it is a voluntary response sample and not a random sample.Thus,the results may not be reliable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cell Phones and Crashes: Analyzing Newspaper Report In an article from the Associated Press, it was reported that researchers “randomly selected 100 New York motorists who had been in an accident and 100 who had not been in an accident. Of those in accidents, 13.7 percent owned a cellular phone, while just 10.6 percent of the accident-free drivers had a phone in the car.” What is wrong with these results?

Foot Length , Height Listed below are foot lengths (cm) and heights (cm) of males from Data Set 2 “Foot and Height” in Appendix B. Which method of nonparametric statistics should be used? What characteristic of the data is investigated with this test?

Foot Length 27.8 25.7 26.7 25.9 26.4 29.2 26.8 28.1 25.4 27.9

Height 180.3 175.3 184.8 177.8 182.3 185.4 180.3 175.3 177.8 185.4

Using the Runs Test for Randomness. In Exercises 5–10, use the runs test with a significance level of\(\alpha \)= 0.05. (All data are listed in order by row.)

Newspapers Media experts claim that daily print newspapers are declining because of Internet access. Listed below are the numbers of daily print newspapers in the United States for a recent sequence of years. First find the median, then test for randomness of the numbers above and below the median. What do the results suggest?

1611

1586

1570

1556

1548

1533

1520

1509

1489

1483

1480

1468

1457

1456

1457

1452

1437

1422

1408

1387

1382


Nominal Data. In Exercises 9–12, use the sign test for the claim involving nominal data.

Medical Malpractice In a study of 1228 randomly selected medical malpractice lawsuits, it was found that 856 of them were dropped or dismissed (based on data from the Physicians Insurers Association of America). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that there is a difference between the rate of medical malpractice lawsuits that go to trial and the rate of such lawsuits that are dropped or dismissed.

Using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. In Exercises 5–8, use the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Correcting the H Test Statistic for Ties In using the Kruskal-Wallis test, there is a correction factor that should be applied whenever there are many ties: Divide H by

\(1 - \frac{{\sum T }}{{{N^3} - N}}\)

First combine all of the sample data into one list, and then, in that combined list, identify the different groups of sample values that are tied. For each individual group of tied observations, identify the number of sample values that are tied and designate that number as t, then calculate\(T = {t^3} - t\). Next, add the T values to get\(\sum T \). The value of N is the total number of observations in all samples combined. Use this procedure to find the corrected value of H for Example 1 in this section on page 628. Does the corrected value of H differ substantially from the value found in Example 1?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free