In Exercises 21–24, use these results from the “1-Panel-THC” test for marijuana use, which is provided by the company Drug Test Success: Among 143 subjects with positive test results, there are 24 false positive results; among 157 negative results, there are 3 false negative results. (Hint: Construct a table similar to Table 4-1, which is included with the Chapter Problem.)

Testing for Marijuana Use

a. How many subjects are included in the study?

b. How many of the subjects had a true negative result?

c. What is the probability that a randomly selected subject had a true negative result?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.The number of subjects is equal to 300.

b.The number of subjects who had a true negative result is equal to 154.

c.The probability of selecting a subject who had a true negative result is equal to 0.513.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data shows the number of positive and negative drug test results of subjects.

The values are categorized as true and false results.

02

Define probability

For an event A, the probability of its occurrence is computed as shown below:

PA=NumberofoutcomesresultinginATotalnumberofoutcomes

03

Calculation

The table below shows the number of subjects that fall in each category:


True Result

False Result

Total

Subject Tested Positive

143 – 24 =119

24

143

Subject Tested Negative

157 – 3 = 154

3

157

Total

273

27

Grand Total=300

a.

The total number of subjects is given as follows:

119+24+154+3=300

Therefore, the total number of subjects is equal to300.

b.

The number of subjects who had a true negative test result is given by:

157-3=154

Therefore, the number of subjects who had a true negative test result is equalto 154.

c.

Theprobability of selecting a subject who had a true negative test result is given as follows:

PTruenegativeresult=NumberofsubjectswhohadatruenegativeresultTotalnumberofsubjects=154300=0.513

Therefore, the probability of selecting a subject who had a true negative test result is equalto 0.513.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Odds. In Exercises 41–44, answer the given questions that involve odds.

Relative Risk and Odds Ratio In a clinical trial of 2103 subjects treated with Nasonex, 26 reported headaches. In a control group of 1671 subjects given a placebo, 22 reported headaches. Denoting the proportion of headaches in the treatment group by ptand denoting the proportion of headaches in the control (placebo) group by role="math" localid="1644405830274" pc, the relative risk is ptpc. The relative risk is a measure of the strength of the effect of the Nasonex treatment. Another such measure is the odds ratio, which is the ratio of the odds in favor of a headache for the treatment group to the odds in favor of a headache for the control (placebo) group, found by evaluating the following:pt/1-ptpc/1-pc

The relative risk and odds ratios are commonly used in medicine and epidemiological studies. Find the relative risk and odds ratio for the headache data. What do the results suggest about the risk of a headache from the Nasonex treatment?

In Exercises 25–32, find the probability and answer the questions. YSORT Gender Selection MicroSort’s YSORT gender selection technique is designed to increase the likelihood that a baby will be a boy. At one point before clinical trials of the YSORT gender selection technique were discontinued, 291 births consisted of 239 baby boys and 52 baby girls (based on data from the Genetics & IVF Institute). Based on these results, what is the probability of a boy born to a couple using MicroSort’s YSORT method? Does it appear that the technique is effective in increasing the likelihood that a baby will be a boy?

Denomination Effect. In Exercises 13–16, use the data in the following table. In an experiment to study the effects of using a \(1 bill or a \)1 bill, college students were given either a \(1 bill or a \)1 bill and they could either keep the money or spend it on gum. The results are summarized in the table (based on data from “The Denomination Effect,” by Priya Raghubir and Joydeep Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36).

Purchased Gum

Kept the Money

Students Given A \(1 bill

27

46

Students Given a \)1 bill

12

34

Denomination Effect

a. Find the probability of randomly selecting a student who spent the money, given that the student was given a \(1 bill.

b. Find the probability of randomly selecting a student who kept the money, given that the student was given a \)1 bill.

c. What do the preceding results suggest?

At Least One. In Exercises 5–12, find the probability.

At Least One Defective iPhone It has been reported that 20% of iPhones manufactured by Foxconn for a product launch did not meet Apple’s quality standards. An engineer needs at least one defective iPhone so she can try to identify the problem(s). If she randomly selects 15 iPhones from a very large batch, what is the probability that she will get at least 1 that is defective? Is that probability high enough so that she can be reasonably sure of getting a defect for her work?

Using Probability to Form Conclusions. In Exercises 37–40, use the given probability value to determine whether the sample results could easily occur by chance, then form a conclusion.

Buckle Up A study of the effect of seatbelt use in head-on passenger car collisions found that drivers using a seatbelt had a 64.1% survival rate, while drivers not using a seatbelt had a 41.5% survival rate. If seatbelts have no effect on survival rate, there is less than a 0.0001 chance of getting these results (based on data from “Mortality Reduction with Air Bag and Seat Belt Use in Head-on Passenger Car Collisions,” by Crandall, Olson, Sklar, American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 153, No. 3). What do you conclude?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free