In Exercises 1–10, use the data in the accompanying table and express all results in decimal form. (The data are from “Mortality Reduction with Air Bag and Seat Belt Use in Head-On Passenger Car Collisions,” by Crandall, Olson, and Sklar, American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 153, No. 3.) Drivers Involved in Head-On Collision of Passenger Cars.

Drivers Involved in Head-On Collision of Passenger Cars


Driver Killed

Driver Not killed

Seatbelt Used

3655

7005

Seatbelt not Used

4402

3040

No Seatbelt Find the probability of randomly selecting a driver and getting one who was killed given that the driver was not using a seatbelt.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The probability that a randomly selected driver was killed, given that he did not use a seatbelt, is 0.592.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The data for passenger cars involved in a head-on collision is provided.

02

Define the concept of conditional probability

The formula for computing conditional probability is stated below.

PAB=PAandBPB

Here, the PA|B is defined as the probability of an event A, given that event Boccurred in the past,computed as the ratio of probability for the occurrence of both A and B over the probability of event B.

03

Compute the totals of rows and columns

The additive totals are:


Driver Killed

Driver Not killed

Total

Seatbelt Used

3655

7005

10660

Seatbelt not Used

4402

3040

7442

Total

8057

10045

18102

04

Compute the conditional probability 

Let E be the event that a driver was killed and F be the event that the driver did not use a seatbelt.

The number of drivers who were not using a seatbelt is 7442.

The number of drivers killed is 8057.

The number of drivers who did not usea seatbelt and were killed is 4402.

The total number of drivers surveyed is 18102.

Using the values, you get:

PEandF=440218102PF=744218102

The probability that a randomly selected driver was killed, given that he did not use a seatbelt, is:

PEF=PEandFPF=440218102744218102=44027442=0.592

Thus, the probability that a randomly selected driver was killed, given that he did not use a seatbelt, is 0.592.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sobriety Checkpoint When the author observed a sobriety checkpoint conducted by the Dutchess County Sheriff Department, he saw that 676 drivers were screened and 6 were arrested for driving while intoxicated. Based on those results, we can estimate that PI= 0.00888, where I denotes the event of screening a driver and getting someone who is intoxicated. What doesPI¯ denote, and what is its value?

Finding Complements. In Exercises 5–8, find the indicated complements.

LOL A U.S. Cellular survey of smartphone users showed that 26% of respondents answered “yes” when asked if abbreviations (such as LOL) are annoying when texting. What is the probability of randomly selecting a smartphone user and getting a response other than “yes”?

In Exercises 25–32, find the probability and answer the questions. YSORT Gender Selection MicroSort’s YSORT gender selection technique is designed to increase the likelihood that a baby will be a boy. At one point before clinical trials of the YSORT gender selection technique were discontinued, 291 births consisted of 239 baby boys and 52 baby girls (based on data from the Genetics & IVF Institute). Based on these results, what is the probability of a boy born to a couple using MicroSort’s YSORT method? Does it appear that the technique is effective in increasing the likelihood that a baby will be a boy?

Using Probability to Form Conclusions. In Exercises 37–40, use the given probability value to determine whether the sample results could easily occur by chance, then form a conclusion.

Cell Phones and Cancer A study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users resulted in 135 who developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute). When comparing this sample group to another group of people who did not use cell phones, it was found that there is a probability of 0.512 of getting such sample results by chance. What do you conclude?

In Exercises 25–32, find the probability and answer the questions. XSORT Gender Selection MicroSort’s XSORT gender selection technique was designed to increase the likelihood that a baby will be a girl. At one point before clinical trials of the XSORT gender selection technique were discontinued, 945 births consisted of 879 baby girls and 66 baby boys (based on data from the Genetics & IVF Institute). Based on these results, what is the probability of a girl born to a couple using MicroSort’s XSORT method? Does it appear that the technique is effective in increasing the likelihood that a baby will be a girl?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free