Presidents. From the Information Please Almanac, we compiled the following table on U.S. region of birth and political party of the first 44 U.S. presidents. The table uses these abbreviations:

D=Democratic, Republican, D=Democratic, W=Whig, F=Federalist, DR=Democratic-Republican, D=Democratic, Republican, D=Democratic, NE=Northeast, MW=Midwest, SO=South, WE=West; R=Republicans, U=Union;

Region
PartyRegionParty
RegionParty
SOFSORMWR
NEFSOUNED
SODRMWRMWD
SODRMWRSOR
SODRMWRNED
NEDRNERSOD
SODNEDWER
NEDMWRMWR
SOWNEDSOD
SOWMWRMWR
SODNERNER
SOWMWRSOD
NEWSODNER
NEDMWRWED
NEDNER

a. What is the population under consideration?

b. What are the two variables under consideration?

c. Group the bivariate data for the variables "birth region" and "party" into a contingency table.

Short Answer

Expert verified

For the third class, the lowest and highest cutpoints are 22 and 30, respectively.

As a result, observation 22 is assigned to the third class.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

A quantitative data set has been grouped by using cut point grouping with equal-width classes of with 8 .

a)

If the class's midpoint is 10, we can calculate the lower and higher cut points as follows:

The midpoint of a class is defined as

Midpoint=Lowercutpoint+Uppercutpoint210=Lowercutpoint+Uppercutpoint2Lowercutpoint+uppercutpoint=20....(1)

Given that the width of the class interval is 8

That is,

Uppercutpoint-Lowercutpoint=8.....(2)

02

Definition

When (1) and (2) are combined, we get

2Uppercutpoint=28Uppercutpoint=282=14

By substituting the upper cut point in equation (1), we get

Lowercutpoint+Uppercutpoint=20Lowercutpoint=20-Uppercutpoint=20-14=6

Therefore, The first class is 6.14

03

Definition

b) We find the class midpoint of the second class is shown below:

The Lower cut point of the first class is 6 .

The first class's upper cut point is 14.

In Cut point grouping the lower cut point of the second class is equal to the upper cut point of the first class.

So the Lower cut point of the second class is 14

The upper cut point of the second class is

= Lower cut point of the second class + Class width

=14+8

=22

By definition, the midpoint is given by

Midpoint=Lowercutpoint+Uppercutpoint2=14+222=362=18

Therefore, the midpoint of the second class is 18 .

04

Definition

c) We find the lower and cutpoints of the third class is shown below:

The Lower cutpoint of the second class is 14 .

The Upper cutpoint of the second class is 22 .

In Cutpoint grouping the lower cutpoint of the third class is equal to the upper cutpoint of the second class.

So the Lower cutpoint of the third class is 22

The upper cutpoint of the third class is

= Lower cutpoint of the third class + Class width

=22+8=30

Therefore, the lower and upper cutpoints of the third class is 22 and 30 .

05

Definition

d)The third class's lower and higher cutpoints are 22 and 30 respectively.

Therefore the third class constants an observation 22.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each case, decide whether Assumptions 1and 2for using chi-square goodness-of-fit test are satisfied.

Sample size: n=100.

Relative frequencies:0.65,0.30,0.05.

In each of Exercises 12.24-12.33, apply the chi-square goodness-of-fit test, using either the critical-value approach or theP-value approach, to perform the required hypothesis test.
An American roulette wheel contains 18red numbers, 18black numbers, and 2green numbers. The following table shows the frequency with which the ball landed on each color in 200trials.

At the 5%significance level, do the data suggest that the wheel is out of balance?

Bottled Water. A project exploring the bottled-water phenomenon and preference of water types was conducted by researchers M. Lunsford and A. Fink in the article "Water Taste Test Data" (Journal of Statistics Education, Vol. 18, No. 1). One hundred nine subjects participated in double-blind taste tests of three different bottled water brands (Fiji, Aquafina, and Sam's Choice) and tap water. Twelve people preferred the tap water, 27 Aquafino 44 Fiji, and 26 Sam's Choice. At the 5% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the four different water types are not equally likely in preference?

We stated earlier that, if two variables are not associated, ther eis no point in looking for a casual relationship. Why is that so?

Although the chi-square homogeneity test and the chi-square independence test use essentially the same basic procedure, the context of the two tests are quite different. Explain the difference.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free