In Exercises 14.70-14.80, use the technology of your choice to do the following tasks.
a. Decide whether you can reasonably apply the regression t-test. If so, then also do part (b).
b. Decide, at the 55 significance level, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the predictor variable is useful for predicting the response variable.

14.75 High and Low Temperature. The data from Exercise 14.39 for average high and low temperatures in January for a random sample of 50 cities are on the Weiss Stats site.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The regression t-test is a reasonable choice for the provided data.

(b) The findings support the conclusion that the predictor variable "high" temperature is beneficial in predicting "low" temperature at the 5%level.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

The given data from Exercise 14.39 for average high and low temperatures in January for a random sample of 50 cities as follows:

High
low

High
low
33
22

36
28
31
22

59
41
91
74

62
46
86
71

64
51
66
55

85
79
61
45

36
23
64
45

85
68
59
41

41
34
42
33

52
41
33
21

68
48
26
18

34
24
57
45

52
42
45
36

61
52
42
33

35
25
70
45

85
78
85
73

28
15
82
76

45
34
52
38

48
39
85
71

81
64
86
74

28
9
44
37

36
29
59
49

45
40
35
26

85
69
80
64

44
34
85
65

49
36
02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

The MINITAB is used to create a normal probability plot of residuals.
PROCEDURE FOR MINITAB:
Step 1: Select Stat > Regression > Regression from the drop-down menu.
Step 2: In Response, enter the column Low
Step 3: In Predictors, enter the columns High.
Step 4: Select Normal probability plot of residuals from the Graphs menu.
Step 5: Click the OK button.
The MINITAB output will be:

03

Part (a) Step 3: Explanation

The following is the assumption for regression inferences:
Regression line for the population:
For any value of the predictor variable Xis the conditional mean of the response variable Yis β0+β1X.
The response variable's Ystandard deviation is the same as the explanatory variable's Xstandard deviation. The standard deviation is represented by the symbol σ.
Normal populations:
The response variable's distribution is normally distributed.
Independent observations:
The response variable observations are unrelated to one another.

04

Part (a) Step 4: Explanation

Examine the graph for evidence of a violation of one or more of the regression inference assumptions.

  • The residual plot clearly shows that the residuals lie within the horizontal band.
  • It is obvious from the normal probability plot of residuals that the residuals follow a fairly linear pattern.

As a result, for the variables average high January temperature and average low January temperature, the assumptions 1-3 for regression inferences are not broken.
As a result, the regression t-test is a reasonable choice for the provided data.

05

Part (b) Step 1: Given information

To decide, at the 55 significance level, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the predictor variable is useful for predicting the response variable.

06

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

The null hypothesis is indicated as follows:
H0:β1=0
That is to suggest, the predictor variable "High" temperature is useless for forecasting "Low" temperature.
The alternative hypothesis is indicated as follows:
Hα:β10
In other words, the predictor variable "High" temperature can be used to forecast "Low" temperature.
Rejection Rule:
If pis less than a (0.05), reject the null hypothesis H0
MINITAB can be used to find the test statistic and p-value.
PROCEDURE FOR MINITAB:
Step 1: Select Stat > Regression > Regression
Step 2: In Response, enter the column Low.
Step 3: In Predictors, enter the columns High.

Step 4: Click the OK button.

07

Part (b) Step 3: Explanation

The MINITAB output will be:

The test statistic value is $30.91$, and the p-value is $0.000$, according to the MINITAB result.
Use the α=0.05 significance level.
The p-value is lower than the level of significance in this case.
In other words, the p-value (=0.000)<α(=0.05)
As a result of the rejection rule, it may be argued that at α=0.05there is evidence to reject the null hypothesis (H0).
So, the data support the conclusion that the predictor variable "high" temperature is beneficial in predicting "low" temperature at the 5%level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Following are the data on plant weight and quantity of volatile emissions.

α=0.05

presuming that the assumption for regression inference are met, decide at the specified significance level whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the predictor variable is useful for providing the response variable.

Fill in the blanks.

a. The line y=β0+β1xis called the ____

b. The common conditional standard deviation of the response variable is denoted _____

c. For x=6, the conditional distribution of the response variable is a____ distribution having mean___ and standard deviation____.

PCBs and Pelicans. Use the data points given on the WeissStats site for shell thickness and concentration of PCBs for 60 Anacapa pelican eggs referred to in Exercise 14.40.

Foot-pressure Angle. Genu valgum, commonly known as "knee-knock, is a condition in which the knees angle in and touch one another when standing. Genu varum, commonly known as "bow-legged," is a condition in which the knees angle out and the legs bow when standing. In the article "Frontal Plane Knee Angle Affects Dynamic Postural Control Strategy during Unilateral Stance" (Medicine and Science in Sports de Exercise, Vol. 34, No, 7, Pp. 1150-1157), J. Nyland et al studied patients with and without these conditions, One aspect of the study was to see whether patients with genu valgum or genu varum had a different angle of foot pressure when standing. The following table provides summary statistics for the angle, in degrees, of the anterior-posterior center of foot pressure for patients that have genu valgum, genu varum, or neither condition.

At the significance level. do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that a difference exists in the mean angle of anterior-posterior center of foot pressure among people in the three condition groups? Note; For the degrees of freedom in this exercise:

14.95 Plant Emissions. Following are the data on plant weight and quantity of volatile emissions from Exercise 14.25.

x
57
85
57
65
52
67
62
80
77
53
68
y
8.0
22.0
10.5
22.5
12.0
11.5
7.5
13.0
16.5
21.0
12.0

a. Obtain a point estimate for the mean quantity of volatile emissions of all (Solanum tuberosum) plants that weigh 60g.
b. Find a 95%confidence interval for the mean quantity of volatile emissions of all plants that weigh 60g.
c. Find the predicted quantity of volatile emissions for a plant that weighs 60g.
d. Determine a 95%prediction interval for the quantity of volatile emissions for a plant that weighs 60g.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free