Chapter 4: Q11. WE (page 137)
Write proofs in two–column form.
Theorem 4–1.
Short Answer
Statement | Reason |
Given | |
Angle bisector theorem | |
Reflexive property | |
SAS postulate | |
Congruent angles of congruent triangles |
Chapter 4: Q11. WE (page 137)
Write proofs in two–column form.
Theorem 4–1.
Statement | Reason |
Given | |
Angle bisector theorem | |
Reflexive property | |
SAS postulate | |
Congruent angles of congruent triangles |
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeSuppose that name the three pairs of corresponding sides.
Suppose that , then complete the following statement.
Decide whether you can deduce by the SSS, SAS, or ASA postulate that another triangle is congruent to . If so, write the congruence and name the postulate used. If not, write no congruence can be deduced.
Suppose that , then complete the following statement.
For the following figure, does the SAS postulates justify that the two triangles are congruent.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.