Is it possible \({\bf{5}} \times {\bf{5}}\) matrix to be invertible when its columns do not span \({\mathbb{R}^{\bf{5}}}\)? Why or why not

Short Answer

Expert verified

The inverse of the matrix does not exist.

Step by step solution

01

Consider the inverse of the matrix of order \({\bf{5}} \times {\bf{5}}\)

A matrix of the order \(5 \times 5\) has five columns that are linearly independent of each other. There is one vector that can be written as the linear combination of others.

02

Obtain the matrix of the order \({\bf{5}} \times {\bf{5}}\) after column reduction

As the column vectors in the given \(5 \times 5\) matrix are linearly independent, after column reduction, there will be one column with all entries as zero.

So, the determinant of the matrix is zero, and the inverse of the matrix does not exist.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 1–9, assume that the matrices are partitioned conformably for block multiplication. Compute the products shown in Exercises 1–4.

2. \[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}E&{\bf{0}}\\{\bf{0}}&F\end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}A&B\\C&D\end{array}} \right]\]

Let \(A = \left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{\bf{1}}&{\bf{2}}\\{\bf{5}}&{{\bf{12}}}\end{aligned}} \right),{b_{\bf{1}}} = \left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{ - {\bf{1}}}\\{\bf{3}}\end{aligned}} \right),{b_{\bf{2}}} = \left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{\bf{1}}\\{ - {\bf{5}}}\end{aligned}} \right),{b_{\bf{3}}} = \left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{\bf{2}}\\{\bf{6}}\end{aligned}} \right),\) and \({b_{\bf{4}}} = \left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{\bf{3}}\\{\bf{5}}\end{aligned}} \right)\).

  1. Find \({A^{ - {\bf{1}}}}\), and use it to solve the four equations \(Ax = {b_{\bf{1}}},\)\(Ax = {b_2},\)\(Ax = {b_{\bf{3}}},\)\(Ax = {b_{\bf{4}}}\)\(\)
  2. The four equations in part (a) can be solved by the same set of row operations, since the coefficient matrix is the same in each case. Solve the four equations in part (a) by row reducing the augmented matrix \(\left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}A&{{b_{\bf{1}}}}&{{b_{\bf{2}}}}&{{b_{\bf{3}}}}&{{b_{\bf{4}}}}\end{aligned}} \right)\).

Suppose Tand Ssatisfy the invertibility equations (1) and (2), where T is a linear transformation. Show directly that Sis a linear transformation. [Hint: Given u, v in \({\mathbb{R}^n}\), let \[{\mathop{\rm x}\nolimits} = S\left( {\mathop{\rm u}\nolimits} \right),{\mathop{\rm y}\nolimits} = S\left( {\mathop{\rm v}\nolimits} \right)\]. Then \(T\left( {\mathop{\rm x}\nolimits} \right) = {\mathop{\rm u}\nolimits} \), \[T\left( {\mathop{\rm y}\nolimits} \right) = {\mathop{\rm v}\nolimits} \]. Why? Apply Sto both sides of the equation \(T\left( {\mathop{\rm x}\nolimits} \right) + T\left( {\mathop{\rm y}\nolimits} \right) = T\left( {{\mathop{\rm x}\nolimits} + y} \right)\). Also, consider \(T\left( {cx} \right) = cT\left( x \right)\).]

2. Find the inverse of the matrix \(\left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{\bf{3}}&{\bf{2}}\\{\bf{7}}&{\bf{4}}\end{aligned}} \right)\).

a. Verify that \({A^2} = I\) when \(A = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}1&0\\3&{ - 1}\end{array}} \right]\).

b. Use partitioned matrices to show that \({M^2} = I\) when\(M = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}1&0&0&0\\3&{ - 1}&0&0\\1&0&{ - 1}&0\\0&1&{ - 3}&1\end{array}} \right]\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free