-Question:Consumers’ use of discount coupons. In 1894, druggist Asa Candler began distributing handwritten tickets to his customers for free glasses of Coca-Cola at his soda fountain. That was the genesis of the discount coupon. In 1975, it was estimated that 65% of U.S. consumers regularly used discount coupons when shopping. In a more recent consumer survey, 81% said they regularly redeem coupons (NCH Marketing Services 2015 Consumer Survey). Assume the recent survey consisted of a random sample of 1,000 shoppers.

a. Does the survey provide sufficient evidence that the percentage of shoppers using cents-off coupons exceeds 65%? Test using α = 0.05.

b. Is the sample size large enough to use the inferential procedures presented in this section? Explain.

c. Find the observed significance level for the test you conducted in part a and interpret its value.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Since the test statistic exceeds the critical value, reject the null hypothesis.
  2. Therefore, there is enough evidence that the percentage of shoppers using cents-off coupons exceeds 65%. The sample size is large enough to use the inferential procedures.
  3. The observed significance level is 0.00. It is the probability of getting the test statistic more than the observed value.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

A random sample of size n = 1000 shoppers is surveyed. The sample proportion of shoppers that uses cents-off coupons is .

02

Define the claim

The researcher wants to test the claim that the percentage of shoppers using cents-off coupons exceeds 65%.

The null and alternative hypotheses are:

H0 : p = 0.65AgainstHa: p > 0.65

03

Computing the test statistic

a.

The test statistic is:

The test statistic is z = 10.596.

The z-critical value at a 5% significance level for the right-tailed test using the z-table is 1.65.

Since the test statistic exceeds the critical value, reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is enough evidence that the percentage of shoppers using cents-off coupons exceeds 65%.

04

Validating the condition

(b)

The minimum sample size required to use the z-test for the significance of the population proportion is obtained by the following conditions:

and.

Here,

and

Since both conditions are satisfied, the sample size is large enough to use the inferential procedures.

05

Computing the value of the observed significance level

(c)

Referring to part a., the test statistic is z = 10.596. The significance level is α = 0.05.

The observed significance level or the p-value for the right-tailed test is obtained as follows:

From the z-table, the p-value is approximately zero.

Therefore, the observed significance level is 0.00. It is the probability of getting the test statistic more than the observed value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Stability of compounds in new drugs. Refer to the ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (Vol. 1, 2010) study of the metabolic stability of drugs, Exercise 2.22 (p. 83). Recall that two important values computed from the testing phase are the fraction of compound unbound to plasma (fup) and the fraction of compound unbound to microsomes (fumic). A key formula for assessing stability assumes that the fup/fumic ratio is 1:1. Pharmacologists at Pfizer Global Research and Development tested 416 drugs and reported the fup/fumic ratio for each. These data are saved in the FUP file, and summary statistics are provided in the accompanying Minitab printout. Suppose the pharmacologists want to determine if the true mean ratio, μ, differs from 1.

a. Specify the null and alternative hypotheses for this test.

b. Descriptive statistics for the sample ratios are provided in the Minitab printout on page 410. Note that the sample mean,\(\overline x = .327\)is less than 1. Consequently, a pharmacologist wants to reject the null hypothesis. What are the problems with using such a decision rule?

c. Locate values of the test statistic and corresponding p-value on the printout.

d. Select a value of\(\alpha \)the probability of a Type I error. Interpret this value in the words of the problem.

e. Give the appropriate conclusion based on the results of parts c and d.

f. What conditions must be satisfied for the test results to be valid?

In a test of the hypothesis \({H_0}:\mu = 10\) versus \({H_a}:\mu \ne 10\), a sample of n = 50 observations possessed mean \(\bar x = 10.7\) and standard deviation s = 3.1. Find and interpret the p-value for this test.

A random sample of 80 observations from a population with a population mean 198 and a population standard deviation of 15 yielded a sample mean of 190.

a. Construct a hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis that\(\mu < 198\)at a 1% significance level. Interpret your results.

b. Construct a hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis that

at a 1% significance level. Interpret your results.

c. State the Type I error you might make in parts a and b.

Hotels’ use of ecolabels. Refer to the Journal of Vacation Marketing (January 2016) study of travelers’ familiarity with ecolabels used by hotels, Exercise 2.64 (p. 104). Recall that adult travelers were shown a list of 6 different ecolabels, and asked, “Suppose the response is measured on a continuous scale from 10 (not familiar at all) to 50 (very familiar).” The mean and standard deviation for the Energy Star ecolabel are 44 and 1.5, respectively. Assume the distribution of the responses is approximately normally distributed.

a. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star exceeds 43.

b. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star falls between 42 and 45. c. If you observe a response of 35 to an ecolabel, do you think it is likely that the ecolabel was Energy Star? Explain.

If the rejection of the null hypothesis of a particular test would cause your firm to go out of business, would you want ato be small or large? Explain

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free