Suppose the sample in Exercise 7.64 has produced \(\hat p = .83\) and we wish to test \({H_0}:P = 0.9\) against the alternative \({H_a}:p < .9\)

a. Calculate the value of the z-statistic for this test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The z-statistic is -2.333.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The number of sample size is 100.

The hypothesis are given by

\(\begin{aligned}{H_0}:p = 0.9\\{H_a}:p < 0.9\end{aligned}\)

02

z-statistics test

When the variations are known as well as the sampling size is high, a z-test is used to assess if two population means vary. The Z test is a statistical test performed on data that roughly follows a normally distributed. For hypothesis testing, the z test can be used to one sample, samples collected, as well as percentages.

03

Compute the z-statistic

The z-statistic is computed as

\(\begin{aligned}z &= \frac{{\hat p - {p_0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{p_0}{q_0}}}{n}} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.83 - 0.9}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.9 \times 0.1}}{{100}}} }}\\ &= \frac{{ - 0.07}}{{0.03}}\\ &= - 2.333\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the z-statistic is -2.333.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We reject the null hypothesis when the test statistic falls in the rejection region, but we do not accept the null hypothesis when the test statistic does not fall in the rejection region. Why?

What is the difference between Type I and Type II errors in hypothesis testing? How do α and β relate to Type I and Type II errors?

Hotels’ use of ecolabels. Refer to the Journal of Vacation Marketing (January 2016) study of travelers’ familiarity with ecolabels used by hotels, Exercise 2.64 (p. 104). Recall that adult travelers were shown a list of 6 different ecolabels, and asked, “Suppose the response is measured on a continuous scale from 10 (not familiar at all) to 50 (very familiar).” The mean and standard deviation for the Energy Star ecolabel are 44 and 1.5, respectively. Assume the distribution of the responses is approximately normally distributed.

a. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star exceeds 43.

b. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star falls between 42 and 45. c. If you observe a response of 35 to an ecolabel, do you think it is likely that the ecolabel was Energy Star? Explain.

A random sample of 64 observations produced the following summary statistics: \(\bar x = 0.323\) and \({s^2} = 0.034\).

a. Test the null hypothesis that\(\mu = 0.36\)against the alternative hypothesis that\(\mu < 0.36\)using\(\alpha = 0.10\).

b. Test the null hypothesis that \(\mu = 0.36\) against the alternative hypothesis that \(\mu \ne 0.36\) using \(\alpha = 0.10\). Interpret the result.

For the binomial sample sizes and null hypothesized values of p in each part, determine whether the sample size is large enough to use the normal approximation methodology presented in this section to conduct a test of the null hypothesis \({H_0}:p = {p_0}\)

  1. \(n = 900,\;{p_0} = .975\)
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free