Coffee markets that conform to organic standards focus on the environmental aspects of coffee growing, such as the use of shade trees and a reduced reliance on chemical pesticides. A study of organic coffee growers was published in Food Policy (Vol. 36, 2010). In a representative sample of 845 coffee growers from southern Mexico, 417 growers were certified to sell to organic coffee markets while 77 growers were transitioning to become organic certified. In the United States, 60% of coffee growers are organic certified. Is there evidence to indicate that fewer than 60% of the coffee growers in southern Mexico are either organic certified or transitioning to become organic certified? State your conclusion so that there is only a 5% chance of making a Type I error.

Short Answer

Expert verified

At a 5% significance level, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that fewer than 60% of the coffee growers in southern Mexico are either got an organic certification or transitioning to become organically certified.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In the United States, the proportion of coffee growers who got an organic certification is 60%.

As per an article published in Food Policy (Vol. 36, 2010), out of 845 coffee growers from southern Mexico, 494 (=417+77) coffee growers either got an organic certification or transitioning to become organically certified.

That is

The size of the sample isn=845

The sample proportion is

p^=494845=0.585

Where is the sample proportion of coffee growers who are either got an organic certification or transitioning to become organically certified.

02

Setting up the hypotheses

We have to test whether coffee growers have either got organic certification or are transitioning to become certified organic is lesser than 60%.

The null and alternative hypotheses are given as

H0:p=0.60

That is, in southern Mexico, the true proportion of coffee growers who are either got an organic certification or transitioning to become organically certified is not less than 60%.

And

Ha:p<0.60

That is, in southern Mexico, the true proportion of coffee growers who are either got an organic certification or transitioning to become organically certified is fewer than 60%.

03

Calculating the test statistic

The test statistic for testing these hypotheses is

Z=p^-pp1-pn=0.585-0.600.601-0.60845=-0.0150.000284024=-0.89

04

Calculating the critical value

Here

α:The level of significance (chance of making a type I error)

α=.05

Using the standard normal table, the critical value at the 5% significance level is -1.645.

We can see that

Z=-0.89>-1.645

Hence, we failed to reject the null hypothesis.

05

Conclusion

At a 5% significance level, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that fewer than 60% of the coffee growers in southern Mexico are either got an organic certification or transitioning to become organically certified.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a test of H0:μ=100againstHa:μ>100, the sample data yielded the test statistic z = 2.17. Find and interpret the p-value for the test.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported the results of an April 2015 survey of home buyers. In a random sample of 1,971 residential properties purchased during the year, 414 were purchased as a vacation home. Five years ago, 10% of residential properties were vacation homes.

a. Do the survey results allow the NAR to conclude (at α=.01) that the percentage of all residential properties purchased for vacation homes is greater than 10%?

b. In a previous year, the NAR sent the survey questionnaire to a nationwide sample of 45,000 new home owners, of which 1,982 responded to the survey. How might this bias the results? [Note: In the most recent survey, the NAR used a more valid sampling method.

What is the difference between Type I and Type II errors in hypothesis testing? How do α and β relate to Type I and Type II errors?

Jury trial outcomes. Sometimes, the outcome of a jury trial defies the “common sense” expectations of the general public (e.g., the 1995 O. J. Simpson verdict and the 2011 Casey Anthony verdict). Such a verdict is more acceptable if we understand that the jury trial of an accused murderer is analogous to the statistical hypothesis-testing process. The null hypothesis in a jury trial is that the accused is innocent. (The status-quo hypothesis in the U.S. system of justice is innocence, which is assumed to be true until proven beyond a reasonable doubt.) The alternative hypothesis is guilt, which is accepted only when sufficient evidence exists to establish its truth. If the vote of the jury is unanimous in favor of guilt, the null hypothesis of innocence is rejected, and the court concludes that the accused murderer is guilty. Any vote other than a unanimous one for guilt results in a “not guilty” verdict. The court never accepts the null hypothesis; that is, the court never declares the accused “innocent.” A “not guilty” verdict (as in the Casey Anthony case) implies that the court could not find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

a. Define Type I and Type II errors in a murder trial.

b. Which of the two errors is the more serious? Explain.

c. The court does not, in general, know the values of α and β ; but ideally, both should be small. One of these probabilities is assumed to be smaller than the other in a jury trial. Which one, and why?

d. The court system relies on the belief that the value of is made very small by requiring a unanimous vote before guilt is concluded. Explain why this is so.

e. For a jury prejudiced against a guilty verdict as the trial begins, will the value ofα increase or decrease? Explain.

f. For a jury prejudiced against a guilty verdict as the trial begins, will the value of β increase or decrease? Explain

Minimizing tractor skidding distance. Refer to the Journal of Forest Engineering (July 1999) study of minimizing tractor skidding distances along a new road in a European forest, Exercise 6.37 (p. 350). The skidding distances (in meters) were measured at 20 randomly selected road sites. The data are repeated below. Recall that a logger working on the road claims the mean skidding distance is at least 425 meters. Is there sufficient evidence to refute this claim? Use \(\alpha = .10\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free