Crash risk of using cell phones while driving. Studies have shown that drivers who use cell phones while operating a motor passenger vehicle increase their risk of an accident. To quantify this risk, the New England Journal of Medicine (January 2, 2014) reported on the risk of a crash (or near crash) for both novice and expert drivers when using a cell phone. In a sample of 371 cases of novices using a cell phone while driving, 24 resulted in a crash (or near crash). In a sample of 1,467 cases of experts using a cell phone while driving, 67 resulted in a crash (or near crash).

a. Give a point estimate of p, the true crash risk (probability) for novice drivers who use a cell phone while driving.

b. Find a 95% confidence interval for p.

c. Give a practical interpretation of the interval, part b.

d. Repeat parts a–c for expert drivers.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.A point estimate pthe true crash risk (probability) for novice drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is 0.0647.

b.The 95% confidence interval is0.0397,0.0897

c.They are 95% confident that the true crash risk (probability) for novice drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is between0.0397,0.0897

d.1.A point estimate pthe true crash risk (probability) for expert drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is 0.0457

d.2The 95% confidence interval is0.0397,0.0897

d.3They are 95% confident that the true crash risk (probability) for expert drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is between0.0350,0.0564

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In a sample of 371 cases of novices using a cell phone while driving, 24 resulted in a crash (or near crash). In a sample of 1,467 cases of experts using a cell phone while driving, 67 resulted in a crash (or near crash). We need to n compute the following:

a. a point estimate of p, the true cash risk for novice drivers who use a cell phone while driving.

b. a 95% confidence interval for p.

c. a practical interpretation of the interval, part b

d. repetition of parts a-cfor expertdrivers.

02

Step 2:(a) Calculation of a point estimate of p the true crash risk (probability) for novice drivers who use a cell phone while driving.

Sample size = n= 371

Number of successes x =24

Sample proportion

p^=xn=24371=0.0647

A point estimate pthe true crash risk (probability) for novice drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is 0.0647.

03

(b) A 95% confidence interval for p.

Here the confidence coefficient is 95%, hence α=5%.Now from the standard normal distribution table zα2=1.96,

The margin of error

E=zα2×p^1-p^n=1.96×0.0647×1-0.0647371=0.0250

Hence 95% lower limit:p^-E=0.0647-0.0250=0.0397

95% upper limit:p^+E=0.0647+0.0250=0.0897

Hence the 95% confidence interval is0.0397,0.0897

04

(c) Practical interpretation of the interval

We are 95% confident that the true crash risk (probability) for novice drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is between0.0397,0.0897

05

(d) Calculation of a point estimate of p the true crash risk (probability) for expert drivers who use a cell phone while driving

Sample size = n= 1467

Number of successes x = 67

Sample proportion

p^=xn=671467=0.0457

A point estimate pthe true crash risk (probability) for expert drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is 0.0457

Here the confidence coefficient is 95%, hence α=5%.Now from the standard normal distribution table,zα2=1.96

The margin of error

E=zα2×p^1-p^n=1.96×0.0457×1-0.04571467=0.0107

Hence 95% lower limit:p^-E=0.0457-0.0107=0.0350

95% upper limit:p^+E=0.0457+0.0107=0.0564

We are 95% confident that the true crash risk (probability) for expert drivers who use a cell phone while driving.is between0.0350,0.0564

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the confidence level of each of the following confidence intervals μ?

  1. χ¯±1.96σn
  2. χ¯±1.645σn
  3. χ¯±2,575σn
  4. χ¯±1.282σn
  5. χ¯±.99σn

Jitter in a water power system. Jitter is a term used to describe the variation in conduction time of a water power system. Low throughput jitter is critical to successful waterline technology. An investigation of throughput jitter in the opening switch of a prototype system (Journal of Applied Physics) yielded the following descriptive statistics on conduction time for n = 18 trials:x=334.8 nanoseconds, s = 6.3 nanoseconds. (Conduction time is defined as the length of time required for the downstream current to equal 10% of the upstream current.)

a. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the true standard deviation of conduction times of the prototype system.

b. Practically interpret the confidence interval, part a.

c. A system is considered to have low throughput jitter if the true conduction time standard deviation is less than 7 nanoseconds. Does the prototype system satisfy this requirement? Explain.

Budget lapsing at army hospitals. Budget lapsing occurs when unspent funds do not carry over from one budgeting period to the next. Refer to the Journal of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 19, 2007) study on budget lapsing at U.S. Army hospitals, Exercise 2.113 (p. 126). Because budget lapsing often leads to a spike in expenditures at the end of the fiscal year, the researchers recorded expenses per full-time equivalent employee for each in a sample of 1,751 army hospitals. The sample yielded the following summary statistics:x¯=\(6,563 and s=\)2,484. Estimate the mean expenses per full-time equivalent employee of all U.S. Army hospitals using a 90% confidence interval. Interpret the result.

Are you really being served red snapper? Refer to the Nature (July 15, 2004) study of fish specimens labeled “red snapper,” Exercise 3.75 (p. 196). Recall that federal law prohibits restaurants from serving a cheaper, look-alike variety of fish (e.g., vermillion snapper or lane snapper) to customers who order red snapper. A team of University of North Carolina (UNC) researchers analyzed the meat from each in a sample of 22 “red snapper” fish fillets purchased from vendors across the United States in an effort to estimate the true proportion of fillets that are really red snapper. DNA tests revealed that 17 of the 22 fillets (or 77%) were not red snapper but the cheaper, look-alike variety of fish.

a. Identify the parameter of interest to the UNC researchers.

b. Explain why a large-sample confidence interval is inappropriate to apply in this study.

c. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the parameter of interest using Wilson’s adjustment.

d. Give a practical interpretation of the confidence interval.

Cybersecurity survey. Refer to the State of Cybersecurity (2015) survey of firms from around the world, Exercise 1.20 (p. 50). Recall that of the 766 firms that responded to the survey, 628 (or 82%) expect to experience a cyberattack (e.g., a Malware, hacking, or phishing attack) during the year. Estimate the probability of an expected cyberattack at a firm during the year with a 90% confidence interval. Explain how 90% is used as a measure of reliability for the interval.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free