Question: Summer weight-loss camp. Camp Jump Start is an 8-week summer camp for overweight and obese adolescents. Counselors develop a weight-management program for each camper that centers on nutrition education and physical activity. To justify the cost of the camp, counselors must provide empirical evidence that the weight-management program is effective. In a study published in Paediatrics (April 2010), the body mass index (BMI) was measured for each of 76 campers both at the start and end of camp. Summary statistics on BMI measurements are shown in the table.

Source: Based on J. Huelsing, N. Kanafani, J. Mao, and N. H. White, "Camp Jump Start: Effects of a Residential Summer Weight-Loss Camp for Older Children and Adolescents," Pediatrics, Vol. 125, No. 4, April 2010 (Table 3).

a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for determining whether the mean BMI at the end of camp is less than the mean BMI at the start of camp.

b. How should the data be analyzed, as an independent samples test or as a paired difference test? Explain.

c. Calculate the test statistic using the formula for an independent samples test. (Note: This is not how the test should be conducted.)

d. Calculate the test statistic using the formula for a paired difference test.

e. Compare the test statistics, parts c and d. Which test statistic provides more evidence in support of the alternative hypothesis?

f. The p-value of the test, part d, was reported as p 6 .0001. Interpret this result, assuming a = .01.

g. Do the differences in BMI values need to be normally distributed in order for the inference, part f, to be valid? Explain.

h. Find a 99% confidence interval for the true mean change in BMI for Camp Jump Start campers. Interpret the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.

b. The samples are not independent.

c. 3.10

d. T-value = 19.18 and P-value = 0.000

e. The test statistics in part c are much lower than in part d. The p-value smaller than

f. The sample size is sufficiently large nd = 76

g. 2.845, 3.755

h. As a result, we are 99.9% certain that the genuine change in mean BMI between the beginning and the completion of camp is between 2.85 and 3.76.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Null and alternative hypothesis

Let µ1 = mean BMI at the beginning of the camp µ2 = mean BMI at the finish of the camp. The parameter of the interest is µ1 - µ2

To determine if the mean BMI at the finish of camp is less than the mean BMI at the beginning of camp. We test:

02

(b) Independent samples

A paired difference t-test should be used to analyze it. Each adolescent's BMI was assessed at the start and conclusion of the program. The samples are not different.

03

(c) Test statistics formula

04

(d) Paired difference method

The test statistics using the formula for paired difference method is:

Using MINITAB, they find the paired-different t-statistics as follows:

Paired T-test and CI

05

(e) Support the alternative hypothesis

Part c's test statistics are substantially smaller than Part d's test statistics. Part d's test statistics give more proof in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

06

(f) Interpret the result

H0 is rejected because the p-value is less than an (p < 0.0001 0.01) . At α = 0.01 there is sufficient data to suggest that the mean BMI after camp is less than the mean BMI at the beginning of camp.

07

(g) BMI needs values

No, because the sample size is large enough (n = 76), the Central Limit Theorem applies.

08

(h) Interpret the result

The mean BMI change for camp jump-start campers has a 99% confidence interval. The 99% confidence interval for the genuine mean change in BMI for camp jump-start campers is obtained from the MINITAB result in section (d) (2.845,3.755). As a result, we are 99.9% certain that the genuine change in mean BMI between the beginning and the completion of camp is between 2.85 and 3.76.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Web Check response rates. Response rates to Web checks are generally low, incompletely due to druggies starting but not. I am finishing the check. Survey Methodology (December 2013) delved into the factors that impact response rates. In a designed study, Web druggies were directed to. Share in one of several checks with different formats. For illustration, one format employed a welcome screen with a white background, and another format employed a welcome screen with a red background. The “break-off rates,” i.e., the proportion of tried druggies who break off the check before completing all questions, for the two formats are handed in the table.

White Welcome screen

Red Welcome screen

Number of Web users

198

183

The number who break off the survey

49

37

Break-off rate

.258

.202

Source: R. Haer and N. Meidert, “Does the First Impression Count? Examining the Effect of the Welcome Screen Design on the Response Rate,” Survey Methodology, Vol. 39, No. 2, December 2013 (Table 4.1).

a. Corroborate the values of the break-off rates shown in the table.

b. The experimenters theorize that the true break-off rate for Web druggies of the red hello screen will be lower than the corresponding break-off rate for the white hello screen. Give the null and indispensable suppositions for testing this proposition.

c. Cipher the test statistic for the test.

d. Find the p- the value of the test.

e. Make the applicable conclusion using α = .10.

Working on summer vacation. According to a Harris Interactive (July 2013) poll of U.S. adults, about 60% work during their summer vacation. (See Exercise 3.13, p. 169.) Assume that the true proportion of all U.S. adults who work during summer vacation is p = .6. Now consider a random sample of 500 U.S. adults.

a. What is the probability that between 55% and 65% of the sampled adults work during summer vacation?

b. What is the probability that over 75% of the sampled adults work during summer vacation?

Vulnerability of counting party Web spots. When you subscribe to your Facebook account, you're granted access to further. Then 1 million counting parties (RP) Web spots. Vulnerabilities in this sign-on system may permit a bushwhacker to gain unauthorized access to your profile, allowing the bushwhacker to impersonate you on the RP Web point. Computer and systems Masterminds delved into the vulnerability of counting party Web spots and presented their results at the Proceedings of the 5th AMC Factory on Computers & Communication Security (October 2012). RP Web spots were distributed as Garçon- inflow or customer- inflow Web spots. Of the 40 garçon- inflow spots studied, 20 were planted to be vulnerable to impersonation attacks. Of the 54 customer-inflow spots examined, 41 were. Plant to be vulnerable to impersonation attacks. Give your opinion on whether a customer- inflow Web point is more likely to be vulnerable to an impersonation attack than a garçon- inflow Website. However, how much more likely? If so.

Predicting software blights. Relate to the Pledge Software Engineering Repository data on 498 modules of software law written in “C” language for a NASA spacecraft instrument, saved in the train. (See Exercise 3.132, p. 209). Recall that the software law in each module was estimated for blights; 49 were classified as “true” (i.e., the module has imperfect law), and 449 were classified as “false” (i.e., the module has corrected law). Consider these to be Arbitrary independent samples of software law modules. Experimenters prognosticated the disfigurement status of each module using the simple algorithm, “If the number of lines of law in the module exceeds 50, prognosticate the module to have a disfigurement.” The accompanying SPSS printout shows the number of modules in each of the two samples that were prognosticated to have blights (PRED_LOC = “yes”) and prognosticated to have no blights (PRED_LOC = “no”). Now, define the delicacy rate of the algorithm as the proportion of modules. That was rightly prognosticated. Compare the delicacy rate of the algorithm when applied to modules with imperfect law with the delicacy rate of the algorithm when applied to modules with correct law. Use a 99-confidence interval.

DEFECT*PRED_LOC crosstabulation


PRED_LOC
total
noyes

DEFECT False

True

total

440

29

429

49

20

69

449

49

498

A paired difference experiment yielded ndpairs of observations. In each case, what is the rejection region for testing H0d>2?

a. nd=12,α=.05

b.nd=24,α=.10

c.nd=4,α=.025

d.nd=80,α=.01

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free