Whistle-blowing among federal employees. Whistle blowing refers to an employee’s reporting of wrongdoing by co-workers. A survey found that about 5% of employees contacted had reported wrongdoing during the past 12 months. Assume that a sample of 25 employees in one agency are contacted and let x be the number who have observed and reported wrongdoing in the past 12 months. Assume that the probability of whistle-blowing is .05 for any federal employee over the past 12 months.

a. Find the mean and standard deviation of x. Can x be equal to its expected value? Explain.

b. Write the event that at least 5 of the employees are whistle-blowers in terms of x. Find the probability of the event.

c. If 5 of the 25 contacted have been whistle-blowers over the past 12 months, what would you conclude about the applicability of the 5% assumption to this

agency? Use your answer to part b to justify your conclusion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Mean of x is 1.25 the standard deviation of x is 1.089.
  2. Probability of the event that at least 5 of the employees are whistle-blowers in terms of x is 0.0072
  3. If 5 of the 25 contacted have been whistle blowers over the past 12 months, it is concluded that, as number of the whistle blower increase (x), the probability also increases.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A survey found that about 5% of employees contacted had reported wrongdoing during the past 12 months.

Variable x be the number who have observed and reported wrongdoing in the past 12 months.

The probability of whistle-blowing is 0.05 for any federal employee over the past 12 months

02

Calculate the Mean and standard deviation of X

X follows binomial distribution with n=25 and p=0.05

Mean of X is given by np

np=25×0.05=1.25

Standard deviation is given bynpq

Where q = 1 - p .

Therefore,

npq=25×0.05×0.95=1.0897247

pmf of Binomial distribution is

fk,n,p=Pk;n,p=PX=k=nkpk1-pn-k

For k=01,2,…n. where

nk=n!k!n-k!

Therefore,

X P(X=x)

0 0.2774

1 0.3650

2 0.0930

3........... 0.2305

4 0.0269

5 0.0060

03

Calculate the probability that atleast 5 of the employees are whistle blower 

b.

To calculate the probability that at least 5 of the employees are whistle-blowers in terms of x it mean to calculate P(X5)

Hence,

P(X5)=1-P(X4)=0.0072

Hence, the probability that at least 5 of the employees are whistle-blowers in terms of x is 0.0072.

04

Calculate the applicability of the 5% assumption to this agency.

c.

Let the 5 of the 25 contacted have been whistle-blowers over the past 12 months.

To calculating the applicability of the 5% assumption to this agency that is to calculate theP(X=5)

Hence,

Probability for 5 whistle blowers is

role="math" localid="1663244063498" P(X=5)=0.006from part (a)

From part (b)

P(X5)=0.0072

Hence, it can be concluded that as the number of whistle blower (x) increase, the probability also increases. as from part (b) P((X5)P(x=5)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Refer to the Bulletin of Marine Science (April 2010) study of lobster trap placement, Exercise 6.29 (p. 348). Recall that the variable of interest was the average distance separating traps—called trap-spacing—deployed by teams of fishermen. The trap-spacing measurements (in meters) for a sample of seven teams from the Bahia Tortugas (BT) fishing cooperative are repeated in the table. In addition, trap-spacing measurements for eight teams from the Punta Abreojos (PA) fishing cooperative are listed. For this problem, we are interested in comparing the mean trap-spacing measurements of the two fishing cooperatives.

BT Cooperative

93

99

105

94

82

70

86

PA Cooperative

118

94

106

72

90

66

98


Source: Based on G. G. Chester, “Explaining Catch Variation Among Baja California Lobster Fishers Through Spatial Analysis of Trap-Placement Decisions,” Bulletin of Marine Science, Vol. 86, No. 2, April 2010 (Table 1).

a. Identify the target parameter for this study.b. Compute a point estimate of the target parameter.c. What is the problem with using the normal (z) statistic to find a confidence interval for the target parameter?d. Find aconfidence interval for the target parameter.e. Use the interval, part d, to make a statement about the difference in mean trap-spacing measurements of the two fishing cooperatives.f. What conditions must be satisfied for the inference, part e, to be valid?

Question: A company sent its employees to attend two different English courses. The company is interested in knowing if there is any difference between the two courses attended by its employees. When the employees returned from the courses, the company asked them to take a common test. The summary statistics of the test results of each of the two English courses are recorded in the following table:

a. Identify the parameter(s) that would help the company determine the difference between the two courses.

b. State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses that the company would like to test.

c. After conducting the hypothesis test at thesignificance level, the company found the p-value. Interpret this result for the company.

Comparing taste-test rating protocols. Taste-testers of new food products are presented with several competing food samples and asked to rate the taste of each on a 9-point scale (where1="dislike extremely" and9="like extremely"). In the Journal of Sensory Studies (June 2014), food scientists compared two different taste-testing protocols. The sequential monadic (SM) method presented the samples one-at-a-time to the taster in a random order, while the rank rating (RR) method presented the samples to the taster all at once, side-by-side. Consider the following experiment (similar to the one conducted in the journal): 50 consumers of apricot jelly were asked to taste test five different varieties. Half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. In a second experiment, 50 consumers of cheese were asked to taste-test four different varieties. Again, half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. For each product (apricot jelly and cheese), the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) were compared. The results are shown in the accompanying tables.

a. Consider the five varieties of apricot jelly. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

b. Consider the four varieties of cheese. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

c. Explain why the taste-test scores do not need to be normally distributed for the inferences, parts a and b, to be valid.

Random samples of size n1=400 andn2=500 were drawn from populations 1 and 2, respectively. The samples yieldedx1=105 and x2=140. TestH0:p1-p20 againstHa:p1-p2<0at the 1% level of significance.

Gouges on a spindle. A tool-and-die machine shop produces extremely high-tolerance spindles. The spindles are 18-inch slender rods used in a variety of military equipment. A piece of equipment used in the manufacture of the spindles malfunctions on occasion and places a single gouge somewhere on the spindle. However, if the spindle can be cut so that it has 14 consecutive inches without a gouge, then the spindle can be salvaged for other purposes. Assuming that the location of the gouge along the spindle is random, what is the probability that a defective spindle can be salvaged?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free