Web Check response rates. Response rates to Web checks are generally low, incompletely due to druggies starting but not. I am finishing the check. Survey Methodology (December 2013) delved into the factors that impact response rates. In a designed study, Web druggies were directed to. Share in one of several checks with different formats. For illustration, one format employed a welcome screen with a white background, and another format employed a welcome screen with a red background. The “break-off rates,” i.e., the proportion of tried druggies who break off the check before completing all questions, for the two formats are handed in the table.

White Welcome screen

Red Welcome screen

Number of Web users

198

183

The number who break off the survey

49

37

Break-off rate

.258

.202

Source: R. Haer and N. Meidert, “Does the First Impression Count? Examining the Effect of the Welcome Screen Design on the Response Rate,” Survey Methodology, Vol. 39, No. 2, December 2013 (Table 4.1).

a. Corroborate the values of the break-off rates shown in the table.

b. The experimenters theorize that the true break-off rate for Web druggies of the red hello screen will be lower than the corresponding break-off rate for the white hello screen. Give the null and indispensable suppositions for testing this proposition.

c. Cipher the test statistic for the test.

d. Find the p- the value of the test.

e. Make the applicable conclusion using α = .10.

Short Answer

Expert verified

A test statistic assesses the level of agreement among a data set and the null hypothesis. Its recorded values ranged randomly from one random test to another.

Step by step solution

01

Step by Step SolutionStep 1: (a) Verify the values of the break-off rates shown in the table

Consider Xred= 49 and need= 190.

The value of the break-off rate for the white welcome screen is,

P_red=xwhitenwhite=49190

= 0.258

Consider xred = 37 and nred= 183.

The value of the break-off rate for the red welcome screen is,

P_red=xrednred=37183

= 0.202

The value of the break-off rates shown in the table is verified.

02

State the hypotheses

Null hypothesis:

H0 = Pwhite - Pred= 0

The real break-off rate for Internet users who see the red welcome display will be smaller than the actual break-off percentage for Internet users who see the white welcome display.

Alternative hypothesis:

H0: White-Pred > 0

The real break-off rate for Internet users who see the red welcome display will be smaller than the actual break-off percentage for Internet users who see the white welcome display.

03

Use MINITAB to obtain the test statistic

MINITAB procedure:

Step 1: Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions.

Step 2: Choose Summarized data.

Step 3: In the First sample, enter Trials as 190 and Events as 49.

Step 4 in the Second sample, enter Trials as 183 and Events as 37.

Step 5: Check Perform hypothesis test. In Hypothesized proportion, enter 0.

Step 6: Check Options, enter Confidence level as 90.0

Step 7: Choose greater than in alternative

Step 8: Click OK in all dialogue boxes

04

MINITAB output

Test and CI for Two Proportions

Difference = p (1) - p (2)

Estimate for difference: 0.0557089

90% lower bound for difference: 0.0000130753

Test for difference = 0 (vs > 0) : z = 1.28 P-Value = 0.101

Fisher's exact test - P-Value 0.124

From the MINITAB output, the value of the test statistic is 128.

05

Value of p

Finds the p-value by using MINITAB.

From the MINITAB output in step-4, the value is 0.101.

06

Rejection rule and conclusion

Rejection rule:

If p-value < α . then reject the null hypothesis.

Conclusion:

Here, the p-value is greater than the level of significance.

That is p-value (-0,101) > α(-0,05)

Therefore, the null hypothesis is not rejected at α = 0.05

It can be concluded that the actual break-off rate for Web users of the red welcome screen is hot lower than the corresponding true break-off rate for the white welcome screen.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Corporate sustainability of CPA firms. Refer to the Business and Society (March 2011) study on the sustainability behaviors of CPA corporations, Exercise 2.23 (p. 83). Recall that the level of support for corporate sustainability (measured on a quantitative scale ranging from 0 to 160 points) was obtained for each of 992 senior managers at CPA firms. The accompanying Minitab printout gives the mean and standard deviation for the level of support variable. It can be shown that level of support is approximately normally distributed.

a. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is less than 40 points.

b. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is between 40 and 120 points.

c. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is greater than 120 points.

d. One-fourth of the 992 senior managers indicated a level of support for corporate sustainability below what value?

Descriptive Statistics: Support

Variables

N

Mean

StDev

Variance

Minimum

Maximum

Range

Support

992

67.755

26.871

722.036

0.000

155.000

155.000

The “winner’s curse” in transaction bidding. In transaction bidding, the “winner’s curse” is the miracle of the winning (or loftiest) shot price being above the anticipated value of the item being auctioned. The Review of Economics and Statistics (Aug. 2001) published a study on whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winner’s curse being. Two groups of a stab in a sealed-shot transaction were compared (1)super-experienced stab and (2) less educated stab. In the super-experienced group, 29 of 189 winning flings were above the item’s anticipated value; 32 of 149 winning flings were above the item’s anticipated value in the less-educated group.

  1. Find an estimate of p1, the true proportion of super educated stab who fell prey to the winner’s curse
  2. Find an estimate of p2, the true proportion of less-educated stab who fell prey to the winner’s curse.
  3. Construct a 90 confidence interval for p1-p2.
  4. d. Give a practical interpretation of the confidence interval, part c. Make a statement about whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winner’s curse being.

Question: Deferred tax allowance study. A study was conducted to identify accounting choice variables that influence a manager’s decision to change the level of the deferred tax asset allowance at the firm (The Engineering Economist, January/February 2004). Data were collected for a sample of 329 firms that reported deferred tax assets in 2000. The dependent variable of interest (DTVA) is measured as the change in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance divided by the deferred tax asset. The independent variables used as predictors of DTVA are listed as follows:

LEVERAGE: x1= ratio of debt book value to shareholder’s equity

BONUS: x2 = 1 if firm maintains a management bonus plan,

0 if not

MVALUE: x3 = market value of common stock

BBATH: x4 = 1 if operating earnings negative and lower than last year,

0 if not

EARN: x5 = change in operating earnings divided by total assets

A first-order model was fit to the data with the following results (p-values in parentheses):

Ra2 = .280

y^=0.044+0.006x1-0.035x2-0.001x3+0.296x4+0.010x5

(.070) (.228) (.157) (.678) (.001) (.869)

  1. Interpret the estimate of the β coefficient for x4.
  2. The “Big Bath” theory proposed by the researchers’ states that the mean DTVA for firms with negative earnings and earnings lower than last year will exceed the mean DTVA of other firms. Is there evidence to support this theory? Test using α = .05.
  3. Interpret the value of Ra2.

Question: Forecasting daily admission of a water park. To determine whether extra personnel are needed for the day, the owners of a water adventure park would like to find a model that would allow them to predict the day’s attendance each morning before opening based on the day of the week and weather conditions. The model is of the form

where,

y = Daily admission

x1 = 1 if weekend

0 otherwise

X2 = 1 if sunny

0 if overcast

X3 = predicted daily high temperature (°F)

These data were recorded for a random sample of 30 days, and a regression model was fitted to the data.

The least squares analysis produced the following results:

with

  1. Interpret the estimated model coefficients.
  2. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that this model is useful for predicting daily attendance? Use α = .05.
  3. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean attendance increases on weekends? Use α = .10.
  4. Use the model to predict the attendance on a sunny weekday with a predicted high temperature of 95°F.
  5. Suppose the 90% prediction interval for part d is (645, 1,245). Interpret this interval.

Angioplasty’s benefits are challenged. Further, more than 1 million heart cases each time suffer an angioplasty. The benefits of an angioplasty were challenged in a study of cases (2007 Annual Conference of the American. College of Cardiology, New Orleans). All the cases had substantial blockage of the highways but were medically stable. All were treated with drugs similar to aspirin and beta-blockers. Still, half the cases were aimlessly assigned to get an angioplasty, and half were not. After five years, the experimenter planted 211 of the. Cases in the angioplasty group had posterior heart attacks compared with 202 cases in the drug-only group. Do you agree with the study’s conclusion? “There was no significant difference in the rate of heart attacks for the two groups”? Support your answer with a 95-confidence interval.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free