Estimating production time.A widely used technique for estimating the length of time it takes workers to produce a product is the time study. In a time study, the task to be studied is divided into measurable parts, and each is timed with a stopwatch or filmed for later analysis. For each worker, this process is repeated many times for each subtask. Then the average and standard deviation of the time required to complete each subtask are computed for each worker. A worker’s overall time to complete the task under study is then determined by adding his or her subtask-time averages (Gaither and Frazier, Operations Management, 2001). The data (in minutes) given in the table are the result of a time study of a production operation involving two subtasks.


Worker AWorker B

Repetition

Subtask 1

Subtask 2

Subtask 1

Subtask 2

1

30

2

31

7

2

28

4

30

2

3

31

3

32

6

4

38

3

30

5

5

25

2

29

4

6

29

4

30

1

7

30

3

31

4

a.Find the overall time it took each worker to complete the manufacturing operation under study.

b.For each worker, find the standard deviation of the seven times for subtask 1.

c.In the context of this problem, what are the standard deviations you computed in part bmeasuring?

d.Repeat part b for subtask 2.

e.If you could choose workers similar to A or workers similar to B to perform subtasks 1 and 2, which type would you assign to each subtask? Explain your decisions on the basis of your answers to parts a–d.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The overall time taken by B is more than A.

Step by step solution

01

Finding the overall time taken to complete the work

Worker A

Meanforsubtask1=30+28+31+38+25+29+307=2117=30.14Meanforsubtask2=2+4+3+3+2+4+37=217=3Overalltimetaken=Meanforsubtask1+Meanforsubtask2=30.14+3=33.14

Therefore, the overall time taken by Worker A to complete the work under study is 33.14 mins.

Worker B

Meanforsubtask1=31+30+32+30+29+30+317=2137=30.43Meanforsubtask2=7+2+6+5+4+1+47=297=4.14Overalltimetaken=Meanforsubtask1+Meanforsubtask2=30.43+4.14=34.57

Therefore, the overall time taken by Worker A to complete the work under study is 34.57 mins.

02

Calculating the standard deviation for each worker for subtask 1

Worker AWorker B

x

(x-x¯)

(x-x¯)2

y

(y-y¯)

(y-y¯)2

30

-0.14

0.0196

31

0.57

0.3249

28

-2.14

4.5796

30

-0.43

0.1849

31

0.86

0.7396

32

1.57

2.4649

38

7.86

61.7796

30

-0.43

0.1849

25

-5.14

26.4196

29

-1.43

2.0449

29

-1.14

1.2996

30

-0.43

0.1849

30

-0.14

0.0196

31

0.57

0.3249

SUM

0

94.8572

SUM

0

5.7143


localid="1668432137286" VarianceforworkerA=(x-x¯)2n=94.85727=13.55Standarddeviation=Variance=13.55=3.68VarianceforworkerB=(x-x¯)2n=5.71437=0.816Standarddeviation=Variance=0.816=0.9

03

Standard deviations computed in part b measuring

Worker A's standard deviation for completing subtask 1 is 3.68 minutes.

The standard deviation for completing subtask 1 for Worker B is 0.9 minutes.

04

Computing the standard deviation for each worker for subtask 2

Worker AWorker B

x

(x-x¯)

(x-x¯)2

y

(y-y¯)

(y-y¯)2

2

-1

1

7

2.86

8.1796

4

1

1

2

-2.14

4.5796

3

0

0

6

1.86

3.4596

3

0

0

5

0.86

0.7396

2

-1

1

4

-0.14

0.0196

4

1

1

1

-3.14

9.8596

3

0

0

4

-0.14

0.0196

SUM

0

4

SUM

0

26.8527

localid="1668431443790" VarianceforworkerA=(x-x¯)2n=47=0.57Standarddeviation=Variance=0.57=0.75VarianceforworkerB=(x-x¯)2n=26.85277=3.8361Standarddeviation=Variance=3.8361=1.96

Worker A's standard deviation for completing subtask 2 is 0.75 minutes.

The standard deviation for completing subtask 2 for Worker B is 1.96 minutes.

05

Determining the distribution of work

The overall time taken by B is more than A.

The standard deviation for subtask 1 is more significant for Worker A than B. Greater standard deviation implies that A's time to complete subtask 1 varies more, and hence there is no certainty as to when the work will get done. Therefore, type B workers should be given subtask 1.

Type A workers should be given subtask 2 because their standard deviation is smaller than worker Bs, implying that there will be a certainty that the work will get done quickly and the time taken will not vary much.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you want to estimate the difference between two population means correct to within 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval. If prior information suggests that the population variances are approximately equal to σ12=σ22=14 and you want to select independent random samples of equal size from the populations, how large should the sample sizes n1, and n2, be?

Given that x is a random variable for which a Poisson probability distribution provides a good approximation, use statistical software to find the following:

a.P(x2) when λ=1

b.P(x2) when λ=2

c.P(x2) when λ=3

d. What happens to the probability of the event {x2} as λ it increases from 1 to 3? Is this intuitively reasonable?

Salmonella in yield. Salmonella infection is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States. How current is Salmonella in yield grown in the major agricultural region of Monterey, California? Experimenters from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) conducted tests for Salmonella in yield grown in the region and published their results in Applied and Environmental Microbiology (April 2011). In a sample of 252 societies attained from water used to wash the region, 18 tested positive for Salmonella. In an independent sample of 476 societies attained from the region's wildlife (e.g., catcalls), 20 tested positive for Salmonella. Is this sufficient substantiation for the USDA to state that the frequency of Salmonella in the region's water differs from the frequency of Salmonella in the region's wildlife? Use a = .01 to make your decision

Homework assistance for accounting students. How much assistance should accounting professors provide students for completing homework? Is too much assistance counterproductive? These were some of the questions of interest in a Journal of Accounting Education (Vol. 25, 2007) article. A total of 75 junior-level accounting majors who were enrolled in Intermediate Financial Accounting participated in an experiment. All students took a pretest on a topic not covered in class; then, each was given a homework problem to solve on the same topic. However, the students were randomly assigned different levels of assistance on the homework. Some (20 students) were given the completed solution, some (25 students) were given check figures at various steps of the solution, and the rest (30 students) were given no help. After finishing the homework, each student was given a posttest on the subject. One of the variables of interest to the researchers was the knowledge gain (or test score improvement), measured as the difference between the posttest and pretest scores. The sample means knowledge gains for the three groups of students are provided in the table.

a. The researchers theorized that as the level of homework assistance increased, the test score improvement from pretest to post test would decrease. Do the sample means reported in the table support this theory?

b. What is the problem with using only the sample means to make inferences about the population mean knowledge gains for the three groups of students?

c. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the Hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "no solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "check figures" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

d. The observed significance level of the t-test of the partc was reported as8248 Using α=.05, interpret this result.

e. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "completed solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "check figures" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

f. The observed significance level of the role="math" localid="1652694732458" t-test of part e was reported as 1849. Using α=.05, interpret this result.

g. The researchers conducted a statistical test of the Hypothesis to compare the mean knowledge gain of students in the "no solutions" group with the mean knowledge gain of students in the "completed solutions" group. Based on the theory, part a sets up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

h. The observed significance level of the t-test of the part wasg reported as2726. Using role="math" localid="1652694677616" α=.05, interpret this result.

Patron amenability to supply biomass. Relate to the Biomass and Energy (Vol. 36, 2012) study of the amenability of directors to supply biomass products similar to fat hay, Exercise8.20 (p. 469). Recall that independent samples of Missouri directors and Illinois directors were surveyed. Another aspect of the study concentrated on the service directors who were willing to supply. One essential service involves windrowing (mowing and piling) hay. Of the 558 Missouri directors surveyed, 187 were willing to offer windrowing. Of the 940 Illinois directors surveyed, 380 were willing to offer windrowing services. The experimenters want to know if the proportion of directors willing to offer windrowing services to the biomass request differs for the two areas, Missouri and Illinois.

a. Specify the parameter of interest to the experimenters.

b. Set up the null and indispensable suppositions for testing whether the proportion of directors willing to offer windrowing services differs in Missouri and Illinois.

c. A Minitab analysis of the data is given below. Detect the test statistic on the printout.

d. provide the rejection region for the test using a = .01.

e. Detect the p- the value of the test on the printout.

f. Make the applicable conclusion using both the p-value and rejection region approach. Your conclusions should agree.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free