Solar energy generation along highways. Refer to the International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering (December 2013) study of solar energy generation along highways, Exercise 8.39 (p. 481). Recall that the researchers compared the mean monthly amount of solar energy generated by east-west– and north-south– oriented solar panels using a matched-pairs experiment. However, a small sample of only five months was used for the analysis. How many more months would need to be selected to estimate the difference in means to within 25 kilowatt-hours with a 90% confidence interval? Use the information provided in the SOLAR file to find an estimate of the standard error required to carry out the calculation

Short Answer

Expert verified

28 months would need to estimate the difference in means to within 25 kilowatt hours.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

With a 90% confidence interval, the researchers compared the mean monthly amount of solar energy.

The standard error is 86.4.

The sampling error is 25.

02

Z-value

A minimum of two steps are required.

For α=0.1

The z-value is given by

zα2=z0.05=1.645

03

Compute the sample

For, z=1.645,andSE=86.4

The sample is calculated as

nd=zα2σdSE2=1.645×86.4252=142.128252=5.6852=32.319=33

A small sample of only 5 months used for analysis.

Therefore,

33-5=28

Therefore, 28 months would need to estimate the difference in means to within 25 kilowatt hours.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let t0 be a particular value of t. Use Table III in Appendix D to find t0 values such that the following statements are true.

a.=P(-t0<t<t0).95wheredf=10b.P(t-t0ortt0)wheredf=10c.P(tt0)=.05wheredf=10d.P(t-t0ortt0)=.10wheredf=20e.P(t-t0ortt0)=.01wheredf=5

Traffic sign maintenance. Refer to the Journal of Transportation Engineering (June 2013) study of traffic sign maintenance in North Carolina, Exercise 8.54 (p. 489). Recall that the proportion of signs on NCDOT-maintained roads that fail minimum requirements was compared to the corresponding proportion for signs on county-owned roads. How many signs should be sampled from each maintainer to estimate the difference between the proportions to within .03 using a 90% confidence interval? Assume the same number of signs will be sampled from NCDOT-maintained roads and county-owned roads

Business sign conservation. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) lately issued new guidelines for maintaining and replacing business signs. Civil masterminds at North Carolina State University studied the effectiveness of colorful sign conservation practices developed to cleave to the new guidelines and published the results in the Journal of Transportation Engineering (June 2013). One portion of the study concentrated on the proportion of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions. Of signs maintained by the. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), .512 were supposed failures. Of signs maintained by. County- possessed roads in North Carolina, 328 were supposed. Failures. Conduct a test of the thesis to determine whether the true proportions of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or by the county. Test using α = .05

A random sample of n observations is selected from a normal population to test the null hypothesis that σ2=25. Specify the rejection region for each of the following combinations of Ha,αand n.

a.Ha:σ225;α=0.5;n=16

b.Ha:σ2>25;α=.10;n=15

c.Ha:σ2>25;α=.01;n=23

d. Ha:σ2<25;α=.01;n=13

e. Ha:σ225;α=.10;n=7

f. Ha:σ2<25;α=.05;n=25

Predicting software blights. Relate to the Pledge Software Engineering Repository data on 498 modules of software law written in “C” language for a NASA spacecraft instrument, saved in the train. (See Exercise 3.132, p. 209). Recall that the software law in each module was estimated for blights; 49 were classified as “true” (i.e., the module has imperfect law), and 449 were classified as “false” (i.e., the module has corrected law). Consider these to be Arbitrary independent samples of software law modules. Experimenters prognosticated the disfigurement status of each module using the simple algorithm, “If the number of lines of law in the module exceeds 50, prognosticate the module to have a disfigurement.” The accompanying SPSS printout shows the number of modules in each of the two samples that were prognosticated to have blights (PRED_LOC = “yes”) and prognosticated to have no blights (PRED_LOC = “no”). Now, define the delicacy rate of the algorithm as the proportion of modules. That was rightly prognosticated. Compare the delicacy rate of the algorithm when applied to modules with imperfect law with the delicacy rate of the algorithm when applied to modules with correct law. Use a 99-confidence interval.

DEFECT*PRED_LOC crosstabulation


PRED_LOC
total
noyes

DEFECT False

True

total

440

29

429

49

20

69

449

49

498

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free