The following is a sample of 25 measurements:

(7, 6, 6, 11, 8, 9, 11, 9, 10, 8, 7, 7, 5, 9, 10, 7, 7, 7, 7, 9, 12, 10, 10, 8, 6)

a.Compute x, s2,, and sfor this sample.

b.Count the number of measurements in the intervals xbar ± s, xbar ± 2s, xbar ± 3s. Express each count as a percentage of the total number of measurements.

c.Compare the percentages found in part bto the percentages given by the Empirical Rule and Chebyshev’s Rule.

d.Calculate the range and use it to obtain a rough approximation for s. Does the result compare favorably with the actualvaluefor sfound in part a?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. xbar = 8.24, s2 = 3.356, s = 1.83

b. 19, 76%

24, 96%

25, 100%

c. Follows the Empirical Rule

d. Range =6, s = 1.5

Step by step solution

01

Computing x bar, s2, s

x

(x-x¯)

(x-x¯)2

7

-1.24

1.5376

6

-2.24

5.0176

6

-2.24

5.0176

11

2.76

7.6176

8

-0.24

0.0576

9

0.76

0.5776

11

2.76

7.6176

9

0.76

0.5776

10

1.76

3.0976

8

-0.24

0.0576

7

-1.24

1.5376

7

-1.24

1.5376

5

-1.066

1.136

9

0.76

0.5776

10

1.76

3.0976

7

-1.24

1.5376

7

-1.24

1.5376

7

-1.24

1.5376

7

-1.24

1.5376

9

0.76

0.5776

12

3.76

14.1376

10

1.76

3.0976

10

1.76

3.0976

8

-0.24

0.0576

6

-2.24

5.0176

Sum=206

0

80.56

localid="1668425769647" Mean(x¯)=xn=20625=8.24Variance=(x-x¯)2n-1=80.5625-1=80.5624=3.356StandardDeviation=Variance=3.356=1.83

Therefore, xbar = 8.24, s2 = 3.356, s = 1.83.

02

Counting the number of measurements in various ranges

Minimum = 6

Maximum = 12

(x¯-s,x¯+s)

x¯=8.24s=1.83Lowerrange=x¯-s=8.24-1.83=6.41Upperrange=x¯+s=8.24+1.83=10.07

Now that we have our range, we will count the measurements that fall within this range to get the number of measurements in this range.

19 measurements fall in the range.

To get the percentage, we will have to divide the number of measurements in the range by the total measurements.

2425=0.760.76×100=76%

Therefore, 76% of our measurements fall in this range.

(x¯-2s,x¯+2s)

localid="1668425792067" x¯=8.24s=1.83Lowerrange=x¯-2s=8.24-2(1.83)=4.58Upperrange=x¯+2s=8.24+2(1.83)=11.9

To get the number of measurements in the range of 4.58 to 11.9, we will count the measurements within this range.

Twenty-four measurements fall in this range.

To get the percentage, we will have to divide the number of measurements in the range by the total measurements.

2425=0.960.96×100=96%

Therefore, 96% of our measurements fall in the 2 standard deviation range.

(x¯-3s,x¯+3s)

localid="1668425810731" x¯=8.24s=1.83Lowerrange=x¯-3s=8.24-3(1.83)=2.75Upperrange=x¯+2s=8.24+3(1.83)=13.73

Now that we have our range, we will count the measurements that fall within this range to get the number of measurements in this range.

All 25 measurements fall in this range.

To get the percentage, we will have to divide the number of measurements in the range by the total measurements.

2525=11×100=100%

Therefore, 100% of our measurements fall in the 3 standard deviation range.

03

Comparing the percentages found in part b to the percentages given by the Empirical Rule and Chebyshev’s Rule

According to the Chebyshev rule, very few or none of the measurements fall in the (x¯-s,x¯+s)range and based on the Empirical rule, almost 68% of the measurements fall in this range.

In the 2 standard deviation range, ¾ or 75% of measurements lie here as per the Chebyshev rule and almost 95% according to the Empirical rule.

In the 3 standard deviation range 8/9, or almost 89% measurements are here, and according to the Empirical rule, 99.6% are here.

Now that we know the rules and have the values in part a, we can clearly say that this distribution is in mound shape and conforms to the Empirical Rule.

04

Computing Range and using it to obtain s and comparing it to the actual s

Range = Max – Min

= 12 – 6

= 6

s=Range4=64=1.5

Using the range, the standard deviation is approximately 1.5.

The actual standard deviation is 1.83.

The approximate standard deviation is lower than the actual one.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Non-destructive evaluation. Non-destructive evaluation(NDE) describes methods that quantitatively characterize materials, tissues, and structures by non-invasive means, such as X-ray computed tomography, ultrasonic, and acoustic emission. Recently, NDE was used to detect defects in steel castings (JOM,May 2005). Assume that the probability that NDE detects a “hit” (i.e., predicts a defect in a steel casting) when, in fact, a defect exists is .97. (This is often called the probability of detection.) Also assume that the probability that NDE detects a hit when, in fact, no defect exists is .005. (This is called the probability of a false call.) Past experience has shown a defect occurs once in every 100 steel castings. If NDE detects a hit for a particular steel casting, what is the probability that an actual defect exists?

Question: Consumers’ attitudes toward advertising. The two most common marketing tools used for product advertising are ads on television and ads in a print magazine. Consumers’ attitudes toward television and magazine advertising were investigated in the Journal of Advertising (Vol. 42, 2013). In one experiment, each in a sample of 159 college students were asked to rate both the television and the magazine marketing tool on a scale of 1 to 7 points according to whether the tool was a good example of advertising, a typical form of advertising, and a representative form of advertising. Summary statistics for these “typicality” scores are provided in the following table. One objective is to compare the mean ratings of TV and magazine advertisements.

a. The researchers analysed the data using a paired samples t-test. Explain why this is the most valid method of analysis. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

b. The researchers reported a paired t-value of 6.96 with an associated p-value of .001 and stated that the “mean difference between television and magazine advertising was statistically significant.” Explain what this means in the context of the hypothesis test.

c. To assess whether the result is “practically significant,” we require a confidence interval for the mean difference. Although this interval was not reported in the article, you can compute it using the information provided in the table. Find a 95% confidence interval for the mean difference and interpret the result. What is your opinion regarding whether the two means are “practically significant.”

Source: H. S. Jin and R. J. Lutz, “The Typicality and Accessibility of Consumer Attitudes Toward Television Advertising: Implications for the Measurement of Attitudes Toward Advertising in General,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2013 (from Table 1)

Product failure behavior. An article in Hotwire (December 2002) discussed the length of time till the failure of a product produced at Hewlett Packard. At the end of the product’s lifetime, the time till failure is modeled using an exponential distribution with a mean of 500 thousand hours. In reliability jargon, this is known as the “wear-out” distribution for the product. During its normal (useful) life, assume the product’s time till failure is uniformly distributed over the range of 100 thousand to 1 million hours.

a. At the end of the product’s lifetime, find the probability that the product fails before 700 thousand hours.

b. During its normal (useful) life, find the probability that the product fails before 700 thousand hours.

c. Show that the probability of the product failing before 830 thousand hours is approximately the same for both the normal (useful) life distribution and the wear-out distribution.

Question: Independent random samples from approximately normal populations produced the results shown below.

Sample 1

Sample 2

52 33 42 4441 50 44 5145 38 37 4044 50 43

52 43 47 5662 53 61 5056 52 53 6050 48 60 55

a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that (μ1-μ2)>10? Test usingα=0.1.

b. Construct a confidence interval for (μ1-μ2). Interpret your result.

Gonzaga University professors conducted a study of television commercials and published their results in the Journal of Sociology, Social Work and Social Welfare (Vol. 2, 2008). The key research question was as follows: “Do television advertisers use religious symbolism to sell goods and services?” In a sample of 797 TV commercials collected ten years earlier, only 16 commercials used religious symbolism. Of the sample of 1,499 TV commercials examined in the more recent study, 51 commercials used religious symbolism. Conduct an analysis to determine if the percentage of TV commercials that use religious symbolism has changed over time. If you detect a change, estimate the magnitude of the difference and attach a measure of reliability to the estimate.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free