Two independent random samples were selected from normally distributed populations to conduct an experiment on the variability of responses of two different experimental procedures that may or may not be the same. The sample sizes, means, and variances are shown in the following table

a. Test the null hypothesis\({H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\)against\({H_0}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\), where,\({\mu _d} = {\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\). Compare\(\alpha = 0.05\)with the p-value of the test

Short Answer

Expert verified

we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The sample sizes are 14 and 16

The means are 44 and 41.

The variances are 569.2 and 810

The hypothesis are given by

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\\{H_a}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\end{aligned}\)

02

Test statistic

For

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{n_1} &= 14,\,\,{n_2} &= 16\\{{\bar x}_1} = 44,\,\;{{\bar x}_2} &= 41\\s_1^2 &= 569.2,\,s_2^2 &= 810\end{aligned}\)

The test statistic is computed as

\(\begin{aligned}{c}t &= \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - {D_0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {44 - 41} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{569.2}}{{14}} + \frac{{810}}{{16}}} }}\\ &= \frac{3}{{\sqrt {40.65 + 50.62} }}\\ &= \frac{3}{{9.55}}\\ = 0.314\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the test statistic is 0.314.

03

P-value

Degrees of freedom are calculated as

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= {n_1} + {n_2} - 2\\ &= 14 + 16 - 2\\ = 30 - 2\\ &= 28\end{aligned}\)

For \(df = 28,\alpha = 0.05\,and\,t = 0.314\)

The p-value is 0.755.

Here, the p-value is greater than 0.05. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The “winner’s curse” in transaction bidding. In transaction bidding, the “winner’s curse” is the miracle of the winning (or loftiest) shot price being above the anticipated value of the item being auctioned. The Review of Economics and Statistics (Aug. 2001) published a study on whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winner’s curse being. Two groups of a stab in a sealed-shot transaction were compared (1)super-experienced stab and (2) less educated stab. In the super-experienced group, 29 of 189 winning flings were above the item’s anticipated value; 32 of 149 winning flings were above the item’s anticipated value in the less-educated group.

  1. Find an estimate of p1, the true proportion of super educated stab who fell prey to the winner’s curse
  2. Find an estimate of p2, the true proportion of less-educated stab who fell prey to the winner’s curse.
  3. Construct a 90 confidence interval for p1-p2.
  4. d. Give a practical interpretation of the confidence interval, part c. Make a statement about whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winner’s curse being.

Independent random samples from two populations with standard deviations σ1=2andσ2=8, respectively, are selected. The sample sizes and the sample means are recorded in the following table:

Sample 1

Sample 2

n1=58x¯1=17.5

n2=62x¯2=16.23

a. Calculate the standard error of the sampling distribution for Sample 1.

b. Calculate the standard error of the sampling distribution for Sample 2.

c. Suppose you were to calculate the difference between the sample means (x1x2). Find the mean and standard error of the sampling distribution (x1x2).

d. Will the statistic (x1x2) be normally distributed?

Fingerprint expertise.A study published in PsychologicalScience(August 2011) tested the accuracy of experts andnovices in identifying fingerprints. Participants were presentedpairs of fingerprints and asked to judge whetherthe prints in each pair matched. The pairs were presentedunder three different conditions: prints from the same individual (match condition), non-matching but similar prints (similar distracter condition), and nonmatching and very dissimilar prints (non-similar distracter condition). The percentages of correct decisions made by the two groups under each of the three conditions are listed in the table.

Conditions

Fingerprints expert

Novices

Match similar

92.12%

74.55%

Distracter

99.32%

44.82%

Non-similar distracter

100%

77.03%

a.Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability that an expert failed to identify the match?

b. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probabilitythat a novice failed to identify the match?

c. Assume the study included 10 participants, 5 experts and 5 novices. Suppose that a pair of matched prints was presented to a randomly selected study participant and the participant failed to identify the match. Is the participant more likely to be an expert or a novice?

Intrusion detection systems. The Journal of Researchof the National Institute of Standards and Technology (November–December 2003) published a study of a doubleintrusion detection system with independent systems. Ifthere is an intruder, system A sounds an alarm with probability.9, and system B sounds an alarm with probability.95. If there is no intruder, system A sounds an alarm withprobability .2, and system B sounds an alarm with probability.1. Now assume that the probability of an intruderis .4. Also assume that under a given condition (intruderor not), systems A and B operate independently. If bothsystems sound an alarm, what is the probability that anintruder is detected?

Shopping vehicle and judgment. Refer to the Journal ofMarketing Research (December 2011) study of shopping cart design, Exercise 2.85 (p. 112). Recall that design engineers want to know whether the mean choice of the vice-over-virtue score is higher when a consumer’s arm is flexed (as when carrying a shopping basket) than when the consumer’s arm is extended (as when pushing a shopping cart). The average choice score for the n1 = 11 consumers with a flexed arm was x¯1= 59, while the average for the n2 = 11
Consumers with an extended arm was x¯2= 43. In which scenario is the assumption required for a t-test to compare means more likely to be violated, S1= 4 and S2= 2, or, S1= 10 and S2 = 15? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free