Independent random samples were selected from two binomial populations. The sizes and number of observed successes for each sample are shown in the following table

c. Explain how to use the confidence interval in part b to test the given hypothesis.

Short Answer

Expert verified

c) The 95% confidence interval is \(\left( {0.033,\,0.327} \right)\).

We reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

 Given Information

The numbers of sample sizes are 100 and 125.

The probabilities of success are 58 and 50.

The hypothesis are given by

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} - {p_2} &= 0\\{H_a}:{p_1} - {p_2} \ne 0\end{aligned}\)

02

Explanation

The confidence interval is

\(\begin{aligned}{c}CI &= \left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) \pm {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \\ &= \left( {0.58 - 0.4} \right) \pm {z_{0.025}}\sqrt {\frac{{.58 \times .42}}{{100}} + \frac{{.4 \times .6}}{{125}}} \\ &= .18 \pm 2.2414 \times 0.066\\ &= .18 \pm 0.147\\ = \left( {.18 - .147,.18 + .147} \right)\\ &= \left( {0.033,\,0.327} \right)\end{aligned}\)

03

Explanation

A confidence interval \(\left( {0.033,\,0.327} \right)\) is an interval centered about the sample statistic \(\left( {{\bf{2}}.{\bf{686}}} \right)\) with width equal to twice the margin of error.

We have, the 95% confidence interval is \(\left( {0.033,\,0.327} \right)\)

We see that the confidence interval does not contain the value defined by null hypothesis, and then our sample result is different.

Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to the Archives of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (Dec. 2007) study of honey as a children’s cough remedy, Exercise 2.31 (p. 86). Children who were ill with an upper respiratory tract infection and their parents participated in the study. Parents were instructed to give their sick child dosage of liquid “medicine” before bedtime. Unknown to the parents, some were given a dosage of dextromethorphan (DM)—an over-the-counter cough medicine—while others were given a similar dose of honey. (Note: A third group gave their children no medicine.) Parents then rated their children’s cough symptoms, and the improvement in total cough symptoms score was determined for each child. The data (improvement scores) for the 35 children in the DM dosage group and the 35 in the honey dosage group are reproduced in the next table. Do you agree with the statement (extracted from the article), “Honey may be a preferable treatment for the cough and sleep difficulty associated with childhood upper respiratory tract infection”? Use the comparison of the two means methodology presented in this section to answer the question.

The data is given below:

Honey Dosage:

12111511101310415169141061081112128129111510159138121089512

DM Dosage:

469477791210116349781212412137101394410159126

Question: Refer to the Bulletin of Marine Science (April 2010) study of lobster trap placement, Exercise 6.29 (p. 348). Recall that the variable of interest was the average distance separating traps—called trap-spacing—deployed by teams of fishermen. The trap-spacing measurements (in meters) for a sample of seven teams from the Bahia Tortugas (BT) fishing cooperative are repeated in the table. In addition, trap-spacing measurements for eight teams from the Punta Abreojos (PA) fishing cooperative are listed. For this problem, we are interested in comparing the mean trap-spacing measurements of the two fishing cooperatives.

BT Cooperative

93

99

105

94

82

70

86

PA Cooperative

118

94

106

72

90

66

98


Source: Based on G. G. Chester, “Explaining Catch Variation Among Baja California Lobster Fishers Through Spatial Analysis of Trap-Placement Decisions,” Bulletin of Marine Science, Vol. 86, No. 2, April 2010 (Table 1).

a. Identify the target parameter for this study.b. Compute a point estimate of the target parameter.c. What is the problem with using the normal (z) statistic to find a confidence interval for the target parameter?d. Find aconfidence interval for the target parameter.e. Use the interval, part d, to make a statement about the difference in mean trap-spacing measurements of the two fishing cooperatives.f. What conditions must be satisfied for the inference, part e, to be valid?

Traffic sign maintenance. Refer to the Journal of Transportation Engineering (June 2013) study of traffic sign maintenance in North Carolina, Exercise 8.54 (p. 489). Recall that the proportion of signs on NCDOT-maintained roads that fail minimum requirements was compared to the corresponding proportion for signs on county-owned roads. How many signs should be sampled from each maintainer to estimate the difference between the proportions to within .03 using a 90% confidence interval? Assume the same number of signs will be sampled from NCDOT-maintained roads and county-owned roads

Comparing taste-test rating protocols. Taste-testers of new food products are presented with several competing food samples and asked to rate the taste of each on a 9-point scale (where1="dislike extremely" and9="like extremely"). In the Journal of Sensory Studies (June 2014), food scientists compared two different taste-testing protocols. The sequential monadic (SM) method presented the samples one-at-a-time to the taster in a random order, while the rank rating (RR) method presented the samples to the taster all at once, side-by-side. Consider the following experiment (similar to the one conducted in the journal): 50 consumers of apricot jelly were asked to taste test five different varieties. Half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. In a second experiment, 50 consumers of cheese were asked to taste-test four different varieties. Again, half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. For each product (apricot jelly and cheese), the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) were compared. The results are shown in the accompanying tables.

a. Consider the five varieties of apricot jelly. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

b. Consider the four varieties of cheese. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

c. Explain why the taste-test scores do not need to be normally distributed for the inferences, parts a and b, to be valid.

Question: The speed with which consumers decide to purchase a product was investigated in the Journal of Consumer Research (August 2011). The researchers theorized that consumers with last names that begin with letters later in the alphabet will tend to acquire items faster than those whose last names begin with letters earlier in the alphabet—called the last name effect. MBA students were offered free tickets to an event for which there was a limitedsupply of tickets. The first letter of the last name of those who responded to an email offer in time to receive the tickets was noted as well as the response time (measured in minutes). The researchers compared the response times for two groups of MBA students: (1) those with last names beginning with one of the first nine letters of the alphabet and (2) those with last names beginning with one of the last nine letters of the alphabet. Summary statistics for the two groups are provided in the table.

First 9

Letters: A–I

Last 9

Letters: R–Z

Sample size

25

25

Mean response time (minutes)

25.08

19.38

Standard deviation (minutes)

10.41

7.12

Source: Based on K. A. Carlson and J. M. Conrad, “The Last Name Effect: How Last Name Influences Acquisition Timing,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, August 2011.

a. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the true mean response times for MBA students in the two groups.

b. Based on the interval, part a, which group has the shorter mean response time? Does this result support the researchers’ last name effect theory? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free