Financial incentives for college students. A study reported in Inside Higher Education News (May 22, 2006) found that financial incentives can improve low-income college students’ grades and retention. As part of their “Opening Doors” program, a Louisiana community college offered to pay students $1,000 per semester on the condition that they maintain at least half-time enrollment and at least a 2.0 grade point average (GPA).

a. About 61% of Opening Doors students enrolled full time as opposed to about 52% of traditional students. Identify the target parameter for this comparison.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The target parameter of the comparison is\(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right).\)

Step by step solution

01

Given information.

Financial incentives can improve low-income college student’s grades and retention.

The community college offered to pay $1000 per semester on condition that they maintain at least half-time enrollment and at least a GPA of 2.0.

02

State the condition required for valid large sample inference about \(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right).\)                                                               \(\)

The condition required for valid large sample inference is given as follows:

  • The two samples are randomly selected in an independent manner from the two target populations.
  • The sample sizes \({n_1}\)and \({n_2}\)are both large so that the sampling distribution of \(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right)\) will be approximately normal.
03

Identify the target parameter of this comparison

The comparison is that about 61% of Opening Doors students enrolled full-time as opposed to about 52% of traditional students.

According to the information of the comparison, \({\hat p_1}\)is the proportion of opening door students enrolled and \({\hat p_2}\) is the proportion of traditional students enrolled.

The proportion of opening door students enrolled is 61%.

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_1} &= \frac{{61}}{{100}}\\ &= 0.61\end{aligned}\)

The proportion of traditional students enrolled is 52%.

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_2} &= \frac{{52}}{{100}}\\ &= 0.52\end{aligned}\)

As we know that to compare two proportions, we need to consider the difference of population proportions. So, the target parameter is the difference of population proportions,\(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right)\).

Hence, the target parameter of the comparison is \(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right).\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sanitarium administration of malaria cases. One of the most sedate health challenges in India is malaria. Accordingly, the Indian sanitarium director's must-have—the coffers to treat the high volume of admitted malaria cases. A study published in the National Journal of Community Medicine (Vol. 1, 2010) delved into whether the malaria admission rate is more advanced in months than in others. In a sample of 192 sanitarium cases admitted in January, 32 were treated for malaria.

In an independent sample of 403 cases admitted in May (4 months latterly), 34 were treated for malaria.

a. Describe the two populations of stake in this study.

b. Give a point estimate of the contrast in the malaria admission rates in January and May.

c. Find a 90% confidence interval for the contrast in the malaria admission rates in January and May.

d. Based on the interval, part c, can you conclude that contrast exists in the authentic malaria admission rates in January and May? Simplify.

The “winner’s curse” in transaction bidding. In transaction bidding, the “winner’s curse” is the miracle of the winning (or loftiest) shot price being above the anticipated value of the item being auctioned. The Review of Economics and Statistics (Aug. 2001) published a study on whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winner’s curse being. Two groups of a stab in a sealed-shot transaction were compared (1)super-experienced stab and (2) less educated stab. In the super-experienced group, 29 of 189 winning flings were above the item’s anticipated value; 32 of 149 winning flings were above the item’s anticipated value in the less-educated group.

  1. Find an estimate of p1, the true proportion of super educated stab who fell prey to the winner’s curse
  2. Find an estimate of p2, the true proportion of less-educated stab who fell prey to the winner’s curse.
  3. Construct a 90 confidence interval for p1-p2.
  4. d. Give a practical interpretation of the confidence interval, part c. Make a statement about whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winner’s curse being.

Question: Two independent random samples have been selected—100 observations from population 1 and 100 from population 2. Sample means x¯1=26.6,x¯2= 15.5 were obtained. From previous experience with these populations, it is known that the variances areσ12=9andσ22=16 .

a. Find σ(x¯1-x¯2).

b. Sketch the approximate sampling distribution for (x¯1-x¯2), assuming (μ1-μ2)=10.

c. Locate the observed value of (x¯1-x¯2)the graph you drew in part

b. Does it appear that this value contradicts the null hypothesis H0:(μ1-μ2)=10?

d. Use the z-table to determine the rejection region for the test againstH0:(μ1-μ2)10. Useα=0.5.

e. Conduct the hypothesis test of part d and interpret your result.

f. Construct a confidence interval for μ1-μ2. Interpret the interval.

g. Which inference provides more information about the value of μ1-μ2— the test of hypothesis in part e or the confidence interval in part f?

Corporate sustainability of CPA firms. Refer to the Business and Society (March 2011) study on the sustainability behaviors of CPA corporations, Exercise 2.23 (p. 83). Recall that the level of support for corporate sustainability (measured on a quantitative scale ranging from 0 to 160 points) was obtained for each of 992 senior managers at CPA firms. The accompanying Minitab printout gives the mean and standard deviation for the level of support variable. It can be shown that level of support is approximately normally distributed.

a. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is less than 40 points.

b. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is between 40 and 120 points.

c. Find the probability that the level of support for corporate sustainability of a randomly selected senior manager is greater than 120 points.

d. One-fourth of the 992 senior managers indicated a level of support for corporate sustainability below what value?

Descriptive Statistics: Support

Variables

N

Mean

StDev

Variance

Minimum

Maximum

Range

Support

992

67.755

26.871

722.036

0.000

155.000

155.000

History of corporate acquisitions. Refer to the Academy of Management Journal (August 2008) investigation of the performance and timing of corporate acquisitions, Exercise 2.12 (p. 74). Recall that the investigation discovered that in a random sample of 2,778 firms, 748 announced one or more acquisitions during the year 2000. Does the sample provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the true percentage of all firms that announced one or more acquisitions during the year 2000 is less than 30%? Use a=0.05to make your decision.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free