Question: Independent random samples n1 =233 and n2=312 are selected from two populations and used to test the hypothesis Ha:(μ1-μ)2=0against the alternative Ha:(μ1-μ)2≠0

.a. The two-tailed p-value of the test is 0.1150 . Interpret this result.b. If the alternative hypothesis had been Ha:(μ1-μ)2<0 , how would the p-value change? Interpret the p-value for this one-tailed test.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

Random sampling guarantees that the findings received from your sample are close to those received if the full sample was surveyed.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Interpret the result for the given two-tailed p-value of the test

The null hypothesis is Ha:μ1-μ2=0

If we take the significance level to be 0.05 and the p-value is 0.1150.

As the p-value is more than the significance level, so the null hypothesis will not be rejected.

If we take the significance level to be 0.01 , and the p-value is 0.1150 .

As the p-value is more than the significance level, so the null hypothesis will not be rejected.

02

(b) Interpret the p-valueHa:(μ1-μ)2<0  .

If the alternative hypothesis has changed from Ha:μ1-μ2≠0toHa:μ1-μ2<0 , it implies that the p-value should be halved as now it is a one-tailed test instead of a two-tailed test.

So, the p-value will be 0.0575 .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that x is a binomial random variable with n = 1000 andp = 0.50. Use a normal approximation to find each of the following probabilities:

a. P(x>500)

b.P(490≤x<500)

c.P(x>550)

Business sign conservation. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) lately issued new guidelines for maintaining and replacing business signs. Civil masterminds at North Carolina State University studied the effectiveness of colorful sign conservation practices developed to cleave to the new guidelines and published the results in the Journal of Transportation Engineering (June 2013). One portion of the study concentrated on the proportion of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions. Of signs maintained by the. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), .512 were supposed failures. Of signs maintained by. County- possessed roads in North Carolina, 328 were supposed. Failures. Conduct a test of the thesis to determine whether the true proportions of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or by the county. Test using α = .05

Independent random samples from normal populations produced the results shown in the next table.

Sample 1


Sample 2

1.23.11.72.83.0

4.22.73.63.9

a. Calculate the pooled estimate of σ2.

b. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that μ2>μ1? Test using α=.10.

c. Find a 90% confidence interval for (μ1−μ2).

d. Which of the two inferential procedures, the test of hypothesis in part b or the confidence interval in part c, provides more information about (μ1−μ2)?

Fingerprint expertise.A study published in PsychologicalScience(August 2011) tested the accuracy of experts andnovices in identifying fingerprints. Participants were presentedpairs of fingerprints and asked to judge whetherthe prints in each pair matched. The pairs were presentedunder three different conditions: prints from the same individual (match condition), non-matching but similar prints (similar distracter condition), and nonmatching and very dissimilar prints (non-similar distracter condition). The percentages of correct decisions made by the two groups under each of the three conditions are listed in the table.

Conditions

Fingerprints expert

Novices

Match similar

92.12%

74.55%

Distracter

99.32%

44.82%

Non-similar distracter

100%

77.03%

a.Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability that an expert failed to identify the match?

b. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probabilitythat a novice failed to identify the match?

c. Assume the study included 10 participants, 5 experts and 5 novices. Suppose that a pair of matched prints was presented to a randomly selected study participant and the participant failed to identify the match. Is the participant more likely to be an expert or a novice?

Whistle-blowing among federal employees. Whistle blowing refers to an employee’s reporting of wrongdoing by co-workers. A survey found that about 5% of employees contacted had reported wrongdoing during the past 12 months. Assume that a sample of 25 employees in one agency are contacted and let x be the number who have observed and reported wrongdoing in the past 12 months. Assume that the probability of whistle-blowing is .05 for any federal employee over the past 12 months.

a. Find the mean and standard deviation of x. Can x be equal to its expected value? Explain.

b. Write the event that at least 5 of the employees are whistle-blowers in terms of x. Find the probability of the event.

c. If 5 of the 25 contacted have been whistle-blowers over the past 12 months, what would you conclude about the applicability of the 5% assumption to this

agency? Use your answer to part b to justify your conclusion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free