Time in bankruptcy. Refer to the Financial Management (Spring 1995) study of pre-packaged bankruptcy filings, Exercise 2.32 (p. 86). Recall that each of 49 firms that negotiated a reorganization plan with its creditors prior to filing for bankruptcy was classified in one of three categories: joint exchange offers with prepack, prepack solicitation only, and no prefiling vote held. Consider the quantitative variable length of time in bankruptcy (months) saved in the accompanying file. Is it reasonable to use a single number (e.g., mean or median) to describe the center of the time-in-bankruptcy distributions? Or should three "centers" be calculated, one for each of the three categories of prepack firms? Explain

Short Answer

Expert verified

The mean is 2.6546, or the median is 1.5

Step by step solution

01

Reasonable to use a single number of mean or median

As a result, three sorts of plans were investigated:

That is, a "joint" exchange offer accompanied by a pre-packaged bankruptcy request.

"Prepack" refers to solely pre-packaged bankruptcy solicitation.

"None" means there was no pre-filing vote. The information for the 49 businesses is shown in the table below.

\(\begin{aligned}{\rm{Mean for joint}} &= \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{29.2}}{{11}}\\ &= 2.6546\end{aligned}\)

First, they must arrange the data in ascending order.

\({\rm{ }}\;1.2,{\rm{ }}1.2,1.4,{\rm{ }}1.4,{\rm{ }}1.4,{\rm{ }}1.5,{\rm{ }}2.1,{\rm{ }}3.9,{\rm{ }}4.5,{\rm{ }}5.2,{\rm{ }}5.4.\)

\(\begin{aligned}{\rm{\;Median}} &= {\rm{The middle value\; \; \; \; \; \; \; }}\\ &= 1.5\end{aligned}\)

The mean time for “Joint exchange offers with pre-pack” enterprises is 2.6545 months, while the median duration is 1.5 months. Therefore, the average duration spent in bankruptcy for “joint” enterprises is 2.6545 months, whereas half of the businesses are in bankruptcy for 1.5 months or less.

02

Three categories of pre-pack firms

a) Those who have not pre-registered to vote.

b) Those who vote for a collaborative solution.

c) Those who voted for pre-packaged food

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Construct a scatterplot for the data in the following table.

Variable 1: 5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Variable 2: 2 1 3 4 6 10 9 12 17 17

Calculate the variance and standard deviation for samples where

a.n= 10, ∑x2 = 84, ∑x= 20

b.n= 40, ∑x2 = 380, ∑x= 100

c.n= 20, ∑x2 = 18, ∑x= 17.

The economic return to earning an MBA. Refer to the International Economic Review (August 2008) study on the economic rewards to obtaining an MBA degree, Exercise 1.27 (p. 51). Job status information was collected for a sample of 3,244 individuals who sat for the GMAT in each of four time periods (waves). Summary information (number of individuals) for Wave 1 (at the time of taking the GMAT) and Wave 4 (7 years later) is provided in the accompanying table. Use a graph to compare and contrast the job status distributions of GMAT takers in Wave 1 and Wave 4.

Job Status

Wave 1

Wave 4

Working, No MBA

2,657

1,787

Working, Have MBA

0

1,372

Not Working, Business School

0

7

Not Working, Other
Graduate School

36

78

Not Working, 4-Year
Institution

551

0

Total

3,244

3,244

Question: Performance of stock screeners.Refer to the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) statistics on stock screeners, Exercise 2.44 (p. 95). Annualized percentage return on investment (as compared to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index) for 13 randomly selected stock screeners are reproduced in the table.

(9.0, -.1, -1.6, 14.6, 16.0, 7.7, 19.9, 9.8, 3.2, 24.8, 17.6, 10.7, 9.1)

a.Find the range of the data for the 13 stock screeners. Give the units of measurement for the range.

b.Find the variance of the data for the 13 stock screeners. If possible, give the units of measurement for the variance.

c.Find the standard deviation of the data for the 13 stock screeners. Give the units of measurement for the standard deviation

Management system failures.The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is responsible for determining the root cause of industrial accidents (Process Safety Progress, December 2004). The accompanying table gives a breakdown of the root causes of 83 incidents caused by management system failures.

Management System Cause

Category

Number of Incidents

Engineering & Design

Procedures & Practices

Management & Oversight

Training & Communication

27

24

22

10

Total

83

a.Find the relative frequency of the number of incidents for each cause category.

b.Construct a Pareto diagram for the data.

c.From the Pareto diagram, identify the cause categories with the highest (and lowest) the relative frequency of incidents.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free