Reality TV and cosmetic surgery. Refer to the Body Image: An International Journal of Research (March 2010) study of the impact of reality TV shows on a college student’s decision to undergo cosmetic surgery, Exercise 12.17 (p. 725). Recall that the data for the study (simulated based on statistics reported in the journal article) are saved in the file. Consider the interaction model, , where y = desire to have cosmetic surgery (25-point scale), = {1 if male, 0 if female}, and = impression of reality TV (7-point scale). The model was fit to the data and the resulting SPSS printout appears below.

a.Give the least squares prediction equation.

b.Find the predicted level of desire (y) for a male college student with an impression-of-reality-TV-scale score of 5.

c.Conduct a test of overall model adequacy. Use a= 0.10.

d.Give a practical interpretation of R2a.

e.Give a practical interpretation of s.

f.Conduct a test (at a = 0.10) to determine if gender (x1) and impression of reality TV show (x4) interact in the prediction of level of desire for cosmetic surgery (y).

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.The least-square prediction equation is E(y) =11.779-1.972x1+ 0.585x4+0.553 x1x4

b. The predicted score for a male student with an impression-of-reality-TV score of 5 is 9.967.

c.At 95% confidence interval, it can be concluded thatβ1β2β30 .

d.The value of adjusted R2 is 0.439 which indicates that the model is not a good fit for the data.

e. The value of s is 2.350 which is a lower value indicating that the data is close to the regression line plotted and that the data is not spr.

f.At 95% significance, β3= 0 .ead Hence it can be concluded with enough evidence that x1and x2do not interact in the model.

Step by step solution

01

Least square prediction equation

The least-square prediction equation is formed by substituting model parameters in the estimated equation. Here, the least square prediction equation isE(y) =11.779-1.972x1+ 0.585x4+0.553 x1x4

02

Finding prediction level of desire

Since the impression-of-reality-TV-scale score is 5, the value becomes 1 (since we want to predict the level of desire for a male college student). Therefore, mathematically

E(y) = β0+ β1x1+ β2x4 + β3x1x4


E(y) = 11.779- 1.972(1) + 0.585(5) -0.533(1) (5)

E(y)= 9.967

The predicted score for a male student with an impression-of-reality-TV score of 5 is 9.967.

03

Significance of the model

H0: β1 =β2 = β3= 0

Ha : at least one of the parameters localid="1649922695702" β1 ,ββ2,β3 is non zero

Here, F test statistic =SSE/n-(k-1) = 916.787/393-4 = 2.356

Value of F0.05389389 is 1

H0is rejected if F statistic > F0.05389389

For a= 0.05, since F > F0.05389389 Sufficient evidence to reject H0 at 95% confidence interval.

04

Interpretation of R2 a

Adjusted R2denoted by R2a explains the variation in the variables which is explained by the model when additional independent variables are added in the model. The high value of R2a indicates that the model is a good fit for the data while a lower value denotes that the model is not a good fit for the data. Here the value of adjusted R2 is 0.439 which indicates that the model is not a good fit for the data.

05

Analysis of s

The standard error of the regression (s) measures the distance of the data points from the regression line. It gives an estimate of the spread of the data points. Higher value denotes that the data is spread while lower value denotes the data points are closer to the regression line meaning the regression line is a good fit of the data. Here, the value of s is 2.350 which is a lower value indicating that the data is close to the regression line plotted and that the data is not spread.

06

Importance ofβ

H0: β3=0

H0: β0

Here, t-test statistic= 0.0536/0.276 = -0.2039

Value of t0.05374 is 1.645 H0is rejected if t is statistic >t0.05374. For a=0.05 since t >t0.05374. Not sufficient evidence to reject H0at a 95% confidence interval.

Thus, β=0 .Hence it can be concluded with enough evidence that x1and x2 do not interact in the model.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Buy-side vs. sell-side analysts’ earnings forecasts. Refer to the Financial Analysts Journal (July/August 2008) comparison of earnings forecasts of buy-side and sell-side analysts, Exercise 2.86 (p. 112). The Harvard Business School professors used regression to model the relative optimism (y) of the analysts’ 3-month horizon forecasts. One of the independent variables used to model forecast optimism was the dummy variable x = {1 if the analyst worked for a buy-side firm, 0 if the analyst worked for a sell-side firm}.

a) Write the equation of the model for E(y) as a function of type of firm.

b) Interpret the value ofβ0in the model, part a.

c) The professors write that the value ofβ1in the model, part a, “represents the mean difference in relative forecast optimism between buy-side and sell-side analysts.” Do you agree?

d) The professors also argue that “if buy-side analysts make less optimistic forecasts than their sell-side counterparts, the [estimated value ofβ1] will be negative.” Do you agree?

Service workers and customer relations. A study in Industrial Marketing Management (February 2016) investigated the impact of service workers’ (e.g., waiters and waitresses) personal resources on the quality of the firm’s relationship with customers. The study focused on four types of personal resources: flexibility in dealing with customers(x1), service worker reputation(x2), empathy for the customer(x3), and service worker’s task alignment(x4). A multiple regression model was employed used to relate these four independent variables to relationship quality (y). Data were collected for n = 220 customers who had recent dealings with a service worker. (All variables were measured on a quantitative scale, based on responses to a questionnaire.)

a) Write a first-order model for E(y) as a function of the four independent variables. Refer to part

Which β coefficient measures the effect of flexibility(x1)on relationship quality (y), independently of the other

b) independent variables in the model?

c) Repeat part b for reputation(x2), empathy(x3), and task alignment(x4).

d) The researchers theorize that task alignment(x4)“moderates” the effect of each of the other x’s on relationship quality (y) — that is, the impact of eachx, x1,x2, orx3on y depends on(x4). Write an interaction model for E(y) that matches the researchers’ theory.

e) Refer to part d. What null hypothesis would you test to determine if the effect of flexibility(x1)on relationship quality (y) depends on task alignment(x4)?

f) Repeat part e for the effect of reputation(x2)and the effect of empathy(x3).

g) None of the t-tests for interaction were found to be “statistically significant”. Given these results, the researchers concluded that their theory was not supported. Do you agree?

Write a model relating E(y) to one qualitative independent variable that is at four levels. Define all the terms in your model.

Question: Diet of ducks bred for broiling. Corn is high in starch content; consequently, it is considered excellent feed for domestic chickens. Does corn possess the same potential in feeding ducks bred for broiling? This was the subject of research published in Animal Feed Science and Technology (April 2010). The objective of the study was to establish a prediction model for the true metabolizable energy (TME) of corn regurgitated from ducks. The researchers considered 11 potential predictors of TME: dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), ash (ASH), crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), gross energy (GE), amylose (AM), amylopectin (AP), and amylopectin/amylose (AMAP). Stepwise regression was used to find the best subset of predictors. The final stepwise model yielded the following results:

TME^=7.70+2.14(AMAP)+0.16(NDF), R2 = 0.988, s = .07, Global F p-value = .001

a. Determine the number of t-tests performed in step 1 of the stepwise regression.

b. Determine the number of t-tests performed in step 2 of the stepwise regression.

c. Give a full interpretation of the final stepwise model regression results.

d. Explain why it is dangerous to use the final stepwise model as the “best” model for predicting TME.

e. Using the independent variables selected by the stepwise routine, write a complete second-order model for TME.

f. Refer to part e. How would you determine if the terms in the model that allow for curvature are statistically useful for predicting TME?

Question: Risk management performance. An article in the International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 171, 2016) investigated the factors associated with a firm’s supply chain risk management performance (y). Five potential independent variables (all measured quantitatively) were considered: (1) firm size, (2) supplier orientation, (3) supplier dependency, (4) customer orientation, and (5) systemic purchasing. Consider running a stepwise regression to find the best subset of predictors for risk management performance.

a. How many 1-variable models are fit in step 1 of the stepwise regression?

b. Assume supplier orientation is selected in step 1. How many 2-variable models are fit in step 2 of the stepwise regression?

c. Assume systemic purchasing is selected in step 2. How many 3-variable models are fit in step 3 of the stepwise regression?

d. Assume customer orientation is selected in step 3. How many 4-variable models are fit in step 4 of the stepwise regression?

e. Through the first 4 steps of the stepwise regression, determine the total number of t-tests performed. Assuming each test uses an a = .05 level of significance, give an estimate of the probability of at least one Type I error in the stepwise regression.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free