Buy-side vs. sell-side analysts’ earnings forecasts. Refer to the Financial Analysts Journal (July/August 2008) comparison of earnings forecasts of buy-side and sell-side analysts, Exercise 2.86 (p. 112). The Harvard Business School professors used regression to model the relative optimism (y) of the analysts’ 3-month horizon forecasts. One of the independent variables used to model forecast optimism was the dummy variable x = {1 if the analyst worked for a buy-side firm, 0 if the analyst worked for a sell-side firm}.

a) Write the equation of the model for E(y) as a function of type of firm.

b) Interpret the value ofβ0in the model, part a.

c) The professors write that the value ofβ1in the model, part a, “represents the mean difference in relative forecast optimism between buy-side and sell-side analysts.” Do you agree?

d) The professors also argue that “if buy-side analysts make less optimistic forecasts than their sell-side counterparts, the [estimated value ofβ1] will be negative.” Do you agree?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) A dummy variable model with one qualitative independent variable can be written as Ey=β0+β1x1where x1represents the type of firm.

b) β0represents the value of relative optimism (y) at the base level which here is if the analysts worked for a sell-side firm. β1represents the changes in the value of relative optimism (y) due to analysts working in the buy-side firms.

c) The value of β1 represents the mean difference in relative forecast optimism between buy-side and sell-side analysts. The base-level here is analyst representing sell-side firms hence for x1= 1 the coefficient for buy-side firms will be (β0+β1). Therefore, β1essentially represents the mean difference between the two levels.

d) If buy-side analysts, make less optimistic forecasts than the sell-side analysts then the mean difference between theβ0 and β1will be less and the value of β1will be negative.

Step by step solution

01

Dummy variable model

A dummy variable model with one qualitative independent variable can be written as Ey=β0+β1x1where x1represents the type of firm.

02

Interpretation of β

β0represents the value of relative optimism (y) at the base level which here is if the analysts worked for a sell-side firm

β1represents the changes in the value of relative optimism (y) due to analysts working in the buy-side firms.

03

Interpretation of β1

The value of β1 represents the mean difference in relative forecast optimism between buy-side and sell-side analysts. The base-level here is analyst representing sell-side firms hence for x1= 1the coefficient for buy-side firms will be (β0+β1 ). Therefore,β1essentially represents the mean difference between the two levels.

04

Analysis of β1

If buy-side analysts, make less optimistic forecasts than the sell-side analysts then the mean difference between theβ0and β1will be less and the value of β1will be negative

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Goal congruence in top management teams. Do chief executive officers (CEOs) and their top managers always agree on the goals of the company? Goal importance congruence between CEOs and vice presidents (VPs) was studied in the Academy of Management Journal (Feb. 2008). The researchers used regression to model a VP’s attitude toward the goal of improving efficiency (y) as a function of the two quantitative independent variables level of CEO (x1)leadership and level of congruence between the CEO and the VP (x2). A complete second-order model in x1and x2was fit to data collected for n = 517 top management team members at U.S. credit unions.

a. Write the complete second-order model for E(y).

b. The coefficient of determination for the model, part a, was reported asR2=0.14. Interpret this value.

c. The estimate of theβ-value for the(x2)2term in the model was found to be negative. Interpret this result, practically.

d. A t-test on theβ-value for the interaction term in the model,x1x2, resulted in a p-value of 0.02. Practically interpret this result, usingα=0.05.

Question: Revenues of popular movies. The Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com) monitors the gross revenues for all major motion pictures. The table on the next page gives both the domestic (United States and Canada) and international gross revenues for a sample of 25 popular movies.

  1. Write a first-order model for foreign gross revenues (y) as a function of domestic gross revenues (x).
  2. Write a second-order model for international gross revenues y as a function of domestic gross revenues x.
  3. Construct a scatterplot for these data. Which of the models from parts a and b appears to be the better choice for explaining the variation in foreign gross revenues?
  4. Fit the model of part b to the data and investigate its usefulness. Is there evidence of a curvilinear relationship between international and domestic gross revenues? Try usingα=0.05.
  5. Based on your analysis in part d, which of the models from parts a and b better explains the variation in international gross revenues? Compare your answer with your preliminary conclusion from part c.

Question: Write a second-order model relating the mean of y, E(y), to

a. one quantitative independent variable

b. two quantitative independent variables

c. three quantitative independent variables [Hint: Include allpossible two- way cross-product terms and squared terms.]

Question: Consumer behavior while waiting in line. The Journal of Consumer Research (November 2003) published a study of consumer behavior while waiting in a queue. A sample of n = 148 college students was asked to imagine that they were waiting in line at a post office to mail a package and that the estimated waiting time is 10 minutes or less. After a 10-minute wait, students were asked about their level of negative feelings (annoyed, anxious) on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree). Before answering, however, the students were informed about how many people were ahead of them and behind them in the line. The researchers used regression to relate negative feelings score (y) to number ahead in line (x1) and number behind in line (x2).

a.The researchers fit an interaction model to the data. Write the hypothesized equation of this model.

b. In the words of the problem, explain what it means to say that “x1 and x2 interact to affect y.”

c. A t-test for the interaction β in the model resulted in a p-value greater than 0.25. Interpret this result.

d. From their analysis, the researchers concluded that “the greater the number of people ahead, the higher the negative feeling score” and “the greater the number of people behind, the lower the negative feeling score.” Use this information to determine the signs of β1 and β2 in the model.

Question: Estimating repair and replacement costs of water pipes. Refer to the IHS Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (September, 2012) study of the repair and replacement of water pipes, Exercise 11.21 (p. 655). Recall that a team of civil engineers used regression analysis to model y = the ratio of repair to replacement cost of commercial pipe as a function of x = the diameter (in millimeters) of the pipe. Data for a sample of 13 different pipe sizes are reproduced in the accompanying table. In Exercise 11.21, you fit a straight-line model to the data. Now consider the quadratic model,E(y)=β0+β1x+β2x2. A Minitab printout of the analysis follows (next column).

  1. Give the least squares prediction equation relating ratio of repair to replacement cost (y) to pipe diameter (x).
  2. Conduct a global F-test for the model usingα=0.01. What do you conclude about overall model adequacy?
  3. Evaluate the adjusted coefficient of determination,Ra2, for the model.
  4. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the rate of increase of ratio (y) with diameter (x) is slower for larger pipe sizes.
  5. Carry out the test, part d, using α=0.01.
  6. Locate, on the printout, a 95% prediction interval for the ratio of repair to replacement cost for a pipe with a diameter of 240 millimeters. Interpret the result.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free