Question: Write a second-order model relating the mean of y, E(y), to

a. one quantitative independent variable

b. two quantitative independent variables

c. three quantitative independent variables [Hint: Include allpossible two- way cross-product terms and squared terms.]

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The second-order model equation in one quantitative variable is

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x12+ε

b. The second-order model equation in two quantitative variables is

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x12+β4x22

c. The second-order model equation in three quantitative variables is

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β4x1x2+β5x2x3+β6x1x3+β7x12+β8x22+β9x32

Step by step solution

01

Subsequent-sequence model equation

A Subsequent-sequence model relating mean of y, E(y) to one quantitative independent variable can be written as

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β4x1x2+β5x2x3+β6x1x3+β7x12+β8x22+β9x32

Here, β0denotes the y-intercept, β1denotes the slope of the regression line, and β3denotes the curvature of the parabola.

02

Second-order model equation

A second-order model relating the mean of y, E(y) to two quantitative independent variables can be written as

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x12+β4x22

Here, β0denotes the y-intercept, β1denotes changes in y due to x1holdingx2 fixed, β2denotes changes in y due to x2holding x1fixed, β3denotes the curvature of the parabola relating y to x1when x2is held fixed, andβ4 denotes the curvature of the parabola relating y to x2when x1is held fixed.

03

Secondary-series model equation

A secondaryseries model relating mean of y, E(y) to three quantitative independent variables can be written as

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β4x1x2+β5x2x3+β6x1x3+β7x12+β8x22+β9x32

Here, β0denotes the y-intercept β1,β2and β3denotes changes in y due to changes in x holding other x constant, β4,β5and β6denotes the interaction variables and β7,β8and β9denotes the curvature of the parabola relating y to one x whenanother axis held fixed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Shopping on Black Friday. Refer to the International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management (Vol. 39, 2011) study of shopping on Black Friday (the day after Thanksgiving), Exercise 6.16 (p. 340). Recall that researchers conducted interviews with a sample of 38 women shopping on Black Friday to gauge their shopping habits. Two of the variables measured for each shopper were age (x) and number of years shopping on Black Friday (y). Data on these two variables for the 38 shoppers are listed in the accompanying table.

  1. Fit the quadratic model, E(y)=β0+β1x+β2x2, to the data using statistical software. Give the prediction equation.
  2. Conduct a test of the overall adequacy of the model. Use α=0.01.
  3. Conduct a test to determine if the relationship between age (x) and number of years shopping on Black Friday (y) is best represented by a linear or quadratic function. Use α=0.01.

Question: Predicting elements in aluminum alloys. Aluminum scraps that are recycled into alloys are classified into three categories: soft-drink cans, pots and pans, and automobile crank chambers. A study of how these three materials affect the metal elements present in aluminum alloys was published in Advances in Applied Physics (Vol. 1, 2013). Data on 126 production runs at an aluminum plant were used to model the percentage (y) of various elements (e.g., silver, boron, iron) that make up the aluminum alloy. Three independent variables were used in the model: x1 = proportion of aluminum scraps from cans, x2 = proportion of aluminum scraps from pots/pans, and x3 = proportion of aluminum scraps from crank chambers. The first-order model, , was fit to the data for several elements. The estimates of the model parameters (p-values in parentheses) for silver and iron are shown in the accompanying table.

(A) Is the overall model statistically useful (at α = .05) for predicting the percentage of silver in the alloy? If so, give a practical interpretation of R2.

(b)Is the overall model statistically useful (at a = .05) for predicting the percentage of iron in the alloy? If so, give a practical interpretation of R2.

(c)Based on the parameter estimates, sketch the relationship between percentage of silver (y) and proportion of aluminum scraps from cans (x1). Conduct a test to determine if this relationship is statistically significant at α = .05.

(d)Based on the parameter estimates, sketch the relationship between percentage of iron (y) and proportion of aluminum scraps from cans (x1). Conduct a test to determine if this relationship is statistically significant at α = .05.

Question: Personality traits and job performance. Refer to the Journal of Applied Psychology (Jan. 2011) study of the relationship between task performance and conscientiousness, Exercise 12.54 (p. 747). Recall that the researchers used a quadratic model to relate y = task performance score (measured on a 30-point scale) to x1 = conscientiousness score (measured on a scale of -3 to +3). In addition, the researchers included job complexity in the model, where x2 = {1 if highly complex job, 0 if not}. The complete model took the form

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x12+β3x2+β4x1x2+β5x12x2herex2=1E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x12+β3(1)+β4x1(1)+β5(1)2(1)E(y)=(β0+β3)+(β1+β4)x1+(β2+β5)(x1)2

a. For jobs that are not highly complex, write the equation of the model for E1y2 as a function of x1. (Substitute x2 = 0 into the equation.)

b. Refer to part a. What do each of the b’s represent in the model?

c. For highly complex jobs, write the equation of the model for E(y) as a function of x1. (Substitute x2 = 1 into the equation.)

d. Refer to part c. What do each of the b’s represent in the model?

e. Does the model support the researchers’ theory that the curvilinear relationship between task performance score (y) and conscientiousness score (x1) depends on job complexity (x2)? Explain.

Question: Shared leadership in airplane crews. Refer to the Human Factors (March 2014) study of shared leadership by the cockpit and cabin crews of a commercial airplane, Exercise 8.14 (p. 466). Recall that simulated flights were taken by 84 six-person crews, where each crew consisted of a 2-person cockpit (captain and first officer) and a 4-person cabin team (three flight attendants and a purser.) During the simulation, smoke appeared in the cabin and the reactions of the crew were monitored for teamwork. One key variable in the study was the team goal attainment score, measured on a 0 to 60-point scale. Multiple regression analysis was used to model team goal attainment (y) as a function of the independent variables job experience of purser (x1), job experience of head flight attendant (x2), gender of purser (x3), gender of head flight attendant (x4), leadership score of purser (x5), and leadership score of head flight attendant (x6).

a. Write a complete, first-order model for E(y) as a function of the six independent variables.

b. Consider a test of whether the leadership score of either the purser or the head flight attendant (or both) is statistically useful for predicting team goal attainment. Give the null and alternative hypotheses as well as the reduced model for this test.

c. The two models were fit to the data for the n = 60 successful cabin crews with the following results: R2 = .02 for reduced model, R2 = .25 for complete model. On the basis of this information only, give your opinion regarding the null hypothesis for successful cabin crews.

d. The p-value of the subset F-test for comparing the two models for successful cabin crews was reported in the article as p 6 .05. Formally test the null hypothesis using α = .05. What do you conclude?

e. The two models were also fit to the data for the n = 24 unsuccessful cabin crews with the following results: R2 = .14 for reduced model, R2 = .15 for complete model. On the basis of this information only, give your opinion regarding the null hypothesis for unsuccessful cabin crews.

f. The p-value of the subset F-test for comparing the two models for unsuccessful cabin crews was reported in the article as p < .10. Formally test the null hypothesis using α = .05. What do you conclude?

Question: Novelty of a vacation destination. Many tourists choose a vacation destination based on the newness or uniqueness (i.e., the novelty) of the itinerary. The relationship between novelty and vacationing golfers’ demographics was investigated in the Annals of Tourism Research (Vol. 29, 2002). Data were obtained from a mail survey of 393 golf vacationers to a large coastal resort in the south-eastern United States. Several measures of novelty level (on a numerical scale) were obtained for each vacationer, including “change from routine,” “thrill,” “boredom-alleviation,” and “surprise.” The researcher employed four independent variables in a regression model to predict each of the novelty measures. The independent variables were x1 = number of rounds of golf per year, x2 = total number of golf vacations taken, x3 = number of years played golf, and x4 = average golf score.

  1. Give the hypothesized equation of a first-order model for y = change from routine.
  1. A test of H0: β3 = 0 versus Ha: β3< 0 yielded a p-value of .005. Interpret this result if α = .01.
  1. The estimate of β3 was found to be negative. Based on this result (and the result of part b), the researcher concluded that “those who have played golf for more years are less apt to seek change from their normal routine in their golf vacations.” Do you agree with this statement? Explain.
  1. The regression results for three dependent novelty measures, based on data collected for n = 393 golf vacationers, are summarized in the table below. Give the null hypothesis for testing the overall adequacy of the first-order regression model.
  1. Give the rejection region for the test, part d, for α = .01.
  1. Use the test statistics reported in the table and the rejection region from part e to conduct the test for each of the dependent measures of novelty.
  1. Verify that the p-values reported in the table support your conclusions in part f.
  1. Interpret the values of R2 reported in the table.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free