Question: Workplace bullying and intention to leave. Workplace bullying has been shown to have a negative psychological effect on victims, often leading the victim to quit or resign. In Human Resource Management Journal (October 2008), researchers employed multiple regression to examine whether perceived organizational support (POS) would moderate the relationship between workplace bullying and victims’ intention to leave the firm. The dependent variable in the analysis, intention to leave (y), was measured on a quantitative scale. The two key independent variables in the study were bullying (, measured on a quantitative scale) and perceived organizational support (measured qualitatively as “low,” “neutral,” or “high”).

1. Set up the dummy variables required to represent POS in the regression model.
2. Write a model for E(y) as a function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three parallel straight lines, one for each level of POS.
3. Write a model for E(y) as a function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three non-parallel straight lines, one for each level of POS.
4. The researchers discovered that the effect of bullying on intention to leave was greater at the low level of POS than at the high level of POS. Which of the two models, parts b and c, support these findings?

Step by step solution

01

Dummy variables for qualitative variable

The qualitative variable here is perceived organizational support (POS) which has 3 levels of low, neutral and high. To represent k levels, (k-1) no of variables will be introduced in the model. Let’s say x₁represents low level of POS while x₂ represents neutral level of POS.

02

Model for E(y)

A model for E(y) as a function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three parallel straight lines, one for each level of POS will be represented by a model without any interaction amongst the variables.

$\mathit{E}\mathbf{\left(}\mathit{Y}\mathbf{\right)}\mathbf{=}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{0}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{1}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{2}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{3}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{3}}$

Therefore, a model without interaction can be written as

Where,x₁= low level of POS

x₂ = neutral level of POS.

x₃= bullying

03

Reproduction for E(y)

A model for E(y) as a function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three nonparallel straight lines, one for each level of POS will be represented by a model with interaction amongst the variables.

Therefore, a model with interaction can be written as

$\mathit{E}\mathbf{\left(}\mathit{Y}\mathbf{\right)}\mathbf{=}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{0}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{1}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{2}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{3}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{3}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{4}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{1}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{+}{\mathit{\beta }}_{\mathbf{5}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{2}}{\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{3}}$

Where, x₁= low level of POS

x₂ = neutral level of POS.

x₃= bullying

04

Imitation fit for the data

The researchers have concluded that the effect of bullying on intention to leave (y) was greater at low level of POS than at high level of POS indicating that there is some interaction amongst the two variables; bullying and level of POS.

Hence, model written in part c will be a better fit for the data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

• Full Textbook Solutions

  Get detailed explanations and key concepts

• Unlimited Al creation

  Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

• Ads-free access

  To over 500 millions flashcards

• Money-back guarantee

  We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!