Home modifications for wheelchair users. The American Journal of Public Health (January 2002) reported on a study of elderly wheelchair users who live at home. A sample of 306 wheelchair users, age 65 or older, were surveyed about whether they had an injurious fall during the year and whether their home features any one of five structural modifications: bathroom modifications, widened doorways/hallways, kitchen modifications, installed railings, and easy-open doors. The responses are summarized the accompanying table. Suppose we select, at random, one of the 306 surveyed wheelchair users.

a. Find the probability that the wheelchair user had an injurious fall.

b. Find the probability that the wheelchair user had all five features installed in the home.

c. Find the probability that the wheelchair user had no falls and none of the features installed in the home.

d. Given the wheelchair user had all five features installed, what is the probability that the user had an injurious fall?

e. Given the wheelchair user had none of the features installed, what is the probability that the user had an injurious fall?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The probability is 0.157.
  2. The probability is 0.029.
  3. The probability is 0.291.
  4. The probability is 0.222.
  5. The probability is 0.183

Step by step solution

01

Important formula

The formula for probability are P=FavourableoutcomesTotaloutcomes

02

(a) The probability that the wheelchair user had an injurious fall

P(injuriesfall)=48306=0.157

Hence, the probability is 0.157.

03

(b) The probability that the wheelchair user had all five features installed in the home

P(all5athome)=9306=0.029

Hence, the probability is 0.029.

04

(c) The probability that the wheelchair user had no falls and none of the features installed in the home

P(NF)=89306=0.291

Hence, the probability is 0.291.

05

(d) The probability that the user had an injurious fall

P(I|FI)=29=0.222

Hence, the probability is 0.222.

06

(e) The probability that the user use none had an injurious fall

P(I|NF)=20109=0.183

Hence, the probability is 0.183.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The diagram below describes the sample space of a particular experiment and events A and B .

  1. What is this type of diagram called?
  2. Suppose the sample points are equally likely. Find PAand PB.
  3. Suppose P1=P2=P3=P4=116and P5=P6=P7=P8=P9=P10=18 . Find PAand PB.

Jamming attacks on wireless networks. Refer to the International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 172, 2016) study of U.S. military jamming attacks on wireless networks used by terrorists, Exercise 2.8 (p. 73). Recall that 80 recent jamming attacks were classified according to network type (WLAN, WSN, or AHN) attacked and the network's number of channels (single- or multi-channel). The results are reproduced in the accompanying table.

a. Find the probability that a recent jamming attack involved a single-channel network.

b. Find the probability that a recent jamming attack involved a WLAN network.


Network Type/Number of Channels

Number of Jamming Attacks

WLAN / Single

31

WSN / Single

13

AHN / Single

8

WLAN / Multi

14

WSN / Multi

9

AHN / Multi

5

TOTAL

80

Source: S. Vadlamani et al., "Jamming Attacks on Wireless Networks: A Taxonomic Survey, "International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 172, 2016 (Figure 6)

Random shuffling of songs on Spotify. Spotify is a music streaming service that offers both free and subscription options. Users can create playlists and choose to use Spotify’s random shuffling feature to play back the songs. When the shuffling feature was first introduced, many users complained that the algorithm was not working. For example, in a playlist consisting of 2 songs by The White Stripes, 2 by Adele, and 1 by Maroon Five, two possible random orderings of the songs are:

A = {Adele 1, Adele 2, White Stripes 1, White Stripes 2, Maroon Five}

B = {Adele 2, White Stripes 1, Maroon Five, White Stripes 2, Adele 1}

  1. Find the probability that Adele 1 is selected as the first song to play from the playlist.
  2. Given that Adele 1 is selected as the first song, what is the probability that Adele 2 is selected as the second song to play from the playlist?
  3. Given that Adele 1 and Adele 2 are the first two songs selected, what is the probability that White Stripes 1 is selected as the third song to play from the playlist?
  4. Given that Adele 1, Adele 2, and White Stripes 1 are the first three songs selected, what is the probability that White Stripes 2 is selected as the fourth song to play from the playlist?
  5. Given that Adele 1, Adele 2, White Stripes 1 and White Stripes 2 are the first four songs selected, what is the probability that Maroon Five is selected as the last song to play from the playlist?
  6. Find the probability of List A by multiplying the probabilities in parts a–e.
  7. Many users considered List B to be random, but not List A. Demonstrate that the probability of List B is the same as the probability of List A. [Note: In response to user complaints, Spotify now uses a different random shuffling algorithm, one that prevents an outcome like List A from occurring.]

World Cup soccer match draws. Every 4 years the world’s 32 best national soccer teams compete for the World Cup. Run by FIFA (Fédération Internationale de Football Association), national teams are placed into eight groups of four teams, with the group winners advancing to play for the World Cup. Chance(Spring 2007) investigated the fairness of the 2006 World Cup draw. Each of the top 8 seeded teams (teams ranked 1–8, called pot 1) were placed into one of the eight groups (named Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H). The remaining 24 teams were assigned to 3 pots of 8 teams each to achieve the best possible geographic distribution between the groups. The teams in pot 2 were assigned to groups as follows: the first team drawn was placed into Group A, the second team drawn was placed in to Group B, etc. Teams in pots 3 and 4 were assigned to the groups in similar fashion. Because teams in pots 2–4 are not necessarily placed there based on their world ranking, this typically leads to a “group of death,” i.e., a group involving at least two highly seeded teams where only one can advance.

  1. In 2006, Germany (as the host country) was assigned as the top seed in Group A. What is the probability that Paraguay (with the highest ranking in pot 2) was assigned to Group A?
  2. Many soccer experts viewed the South American teams (Ecuador and Paraguay) as the most dangerous teams in pot 2. What is the probability one of the South American teams was assigned to Group A?
  3. In 2006, Group B was considered the “group of death,” with England (world rank 2), Paraguay (highest rank in pot 2), Sweden (2nd highest rank in pot 3), and Trinidad and Tobago. What is the probability that Group B included the team with the highest rank in pot 2 and the team with one of the top two ranks in pot 3?
  4. In drawing teams from pot 2, there was a notable exception in 2006. If a South American team (either Ecuador or Paraguay) was drawn into a group with another South American team, it was automatically moved to the next group. This rule impacted Group C (Argentina as the top seed) and Group F (Brazil as the top seed), because they already had South American teams, and groups that followed these groups in the draw. Now Group D included the eventual champion Italy as its top seed. What is the probability that Group D was not assigned one of the dangerous South American teams in pot 2?

Stock market participation and IQ.Refer to The Journal of Finance(December 2011) study of whether the decisionto invest in the stock market is dependent on IQ, Exercise3.46 (p. 182). The summary table giving the number ofthe 158,044 Finnish citizens in each IQ score/investment category is reproduced below. Again, suppose one of the citizens is selected at random.

IQ Score

Invest in Market

No Investment

Totals

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

893

1,340

2,009

5,358

8,484

10,270

6,698

5,135

4,464

4,659

9,409

9,993

19,682

24,640

21,673

11,260

7,010

5,067

5,552

10,749

12,002

25,040

33,124

31,943

17,958

12,145

9,531

Totals

44,651

113,393

158,044

Source:Based on M. Grinblatt, M. Keloharju, and J. Linnainaa, “IQ and Stock Market Participation,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 66, No. 6, December 2011 (data from Table 1 and Figure 1).

a.Given that the Finnish citizen has an IQ score of 6 or higher, what is the probability that he/she invests in the stock market?

b.Given that the Finnish citizen has an IQ score of 5 or lower, what is the probability that he/she invests in the stock market?

c.Based on the results, parts a and b, does it appear that investing in the stock market is dependent on IQ? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free