USDA chicken inspection. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that one in every 100 slaughtered chickens passes inspection with fecal contamination under its standard inspection system.

a. If a slaughtered chicken is selected at random, what is the probability of passing inspection with fecal contamination?

b. The probability of part a was based on a USDA study that found that 306 of 32,075 chicken carcasses passed inspection with fecal contamination. Do you agree with the USDA's statement about the likelihood of a slaughtered chicken passing inspection with fecal contamination?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. 0.1


  2. No

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step SolutionStep 1: The probability that it will pass fecal contamination inspection

Probability refers to the chance of a random event's outcome. This term refers to determining the likelihood of a given occurrence occurring.

Here,

Fecal contamination is detected in one out of every 100 slaughtered chickens.

Therefore,

P(Randomlyselectedchickenpassesinspectionwithfecalcontamination)=1100=0.01

Hence, the probability is 0.1.

02

The USDA's statement that a slaughtered chicken with fecal contamination is unlikely to pass inspection

No, it's difficult to agree with the USDA's statement regarding the possibility of a slaughtered chicken passing inspection with fecal contamination. According to this research, just 1% of slaughtered chickens pass fecal contamination inspection, implying an extremely low success rate.

It means that 99% of the chickens slaughtered are infected, an unusually high proportion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

On-the-job arrogance and task performance. Human Performance (Vol. 23, 2010) published the results of a study that found that arrogant workers are more likely to have poor performance ratings. Suppose that 15% of all full-time workers exhibit arrogant behaviors on the job and that 10% of all full-time workers will receive a poor performance rating. Also, assume that 5% of all full-time workers exhibit arrogant behaviors and receive a poor performance rating. Let A be the event that a full-time worker exhibits arrogant behavior. Let B be the event that a full-time worker will receive a poor performance rating.

a. Are the events A and B mutually exclusive? Explain.

b. Find P(B/A).

c. Are the events A and B independent? Explain.

Exit poll candidates and voters.In an exit poll, 45% of voters said that the main issue affecting their choice of candidates was the economy, 35% said national security, and the remaining 20% were not sure. Suppose we select one of the voters who participated in the exit poll at random and ask for the main issue affecting his or her choice of candidates.

  1. List the sample points for this experiment.
  2. Assign reasonable probabilities to the sample points.
  3. What is the probability that the main issue affecting randomly selected voters’ choice was either the economy or national security?

In a random sample of 106 social (or service) robots designed to entertain, educate, and care for human users, 63 were built with legs only, 20 with wheels only, 8 with both legs and wheels, and 15 with neither legs nor wheels. One of the 106 social robots is randomly selected and the design (e.g., wheels only) is noted.

  1. List the sample points for this study.
  2. Assign reasonable probabilities to the sample points.
  3. What is the probability that the selected robot is designed with wheels?
  4. What is the probability that the selected robot is designed with legs?

Evaluating the performance of quality inspectors. The performance of quality inspectors affects both the quality of outgoing products and the cost of the products. A product that passes inspection is assumed to meet quality standards; a product that fails inspection may be reworked, scrapped, or reinspected. Quality engineers at an electric company evaluated performances of inspectors in judging the quality of solder joints by comparing each inspector’s classifications of a set of 153 joints with the consensus evaluation of a panel of experts. The results for a particular inspector are shown in the table. One of the 153 solder joints was selected at random.

Committee’s judgment joint

Joint Acceptable

joint Rejectable

Joint Acceptable

101

10

joint Rejectable

23

19

a. What is the probability that the inspector judged the joint to be acceptable? That the committee judged the joint to be acceptable?

b. What is the probability that both the inspector and the committee judged the joint to be acceptable? That neither judged the joint to be acceptable?

c. What is the probability that the inspector and the committee disagreed? Agreed?

Consider the experiment depicted by the Venn diagram, with the sample space S containing five sample points. The sample points are assigned the following probabilities:

P (E1) = .20, P (E2) = .30, P (E3)= .30, P (E4) = .10, P (E5) = .10.

a. Calculate P (A), P (B), and P (AB).

b. Suppose we know that event A has occurred, so that the reduced sample space consists of the three sample points in A—namely, E1, E2, and E3. Use the formula for conditional probability to adjust the probabilities of these three sample points for the knowledge that A has occurred [i.e., P (Ei/A)]. Verify that the conditional probabilities are in the same proportion to one another as the original sample point probabilities.

c. Calculate the conditional probabilityP (E1/A)in two ways: (1) Add the adjusted (conditional) probabilities of the sample points in the intersection AB, as these represent the event that B occurs given that A has occurred; (2) use the formula for conditional probability:

P (B/A) =P (AB)P (A)

Verify that the two methods yield the same result.

d. Are events A and B independent? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free