The power takeoff driveline on tractors used in agriculture is a potentially serious hazard to operators of farm equipment. The driveline is covered by a shield in new tractors, but for a variety of reasons, the shield is often missing on older tractors. Two types of shields are the bolt-on and the flip-up. It was believed that the bolt-on shield was perceived as a nuisance by the operators and deliberately removed, but the flip-up shield is easily lifted for inspection and maintenance and may be left in place. In a study initiated by the U.S. National Safety Council, random samples of older tractors with both types of shields were taken to see what proportion of shields were removed. Of 183tractors designed to have bolt-on shields, 35 had been removed. Of the 136 tractors with flip-up shields, 15 were removed. We wish to perform a test of H0:pb-pif versus Ha:pbpf where pb and pf are the proportions of all tractors with the bolt-on and flip-up shields removed, respectively. Which of the following conditions for performing the appropriate significance test is definitely not satisfied in this case?

(a) Both populations are Normally distributed.

(b) The data come from two independent samples.

(c) Both samples were chosen at random.

(d) The counts of successes and failures are large enough to use Normal calculations.

(e) Both populations are at least 10 times the corresponding sample sizes

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is (a) Both populations are Normally distributed.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The power takeoff driveline on tractors used in agriculture is a potentially serious hazard to operators of farm equipment.

02

Explanation

Conditions for performing a two-sample z-test: Random, Normal and Independent.

Random: Satisfied, because the samples have been given to be random samples.

Normal: Satisfied, because the number of successes (35,15)and failures localid="1650367462435" 183-35=148,136-15=121are at least 10.

Independent: Satisfied, because the sample sizes are less than 10%of the population size.

Thus all except for (a) has been satisfied. (a) cannot be satisfied, because the number of successes is not close to half the sample size and thus the distribution is not symmetric nor normal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

39. Shoes How many pairs of shoes do teenagers have? To find out, a group of AP Statistics students conducted a survey. They selected a random sample of 20female students and a separate random sample of 20male students from their school. Then they recorded the number of pairs of shoes that each respondent reported having. The back-to-back stemplot below displays the data.

In an experiment to learn whether Substance M can help restore memory, the brains of 20rats were treated to damage their memories. The rats were trained to run a maze. After a day, 10rats (determined at random) were given M and 7of them succeeded in the maze. Only 2of the 10control rats were successful. The two-sample z test for “no difference” against “a significantly higher proportion of the M group succeeds”

(a) gives z=2.25,P<0.02

(b) gives z=2.60,P<0.005

(c) gives z=2.25,P<0.04but not <0.02

(d) should not be used because the Random condition is violated

(e) should not be used because the Normal condition is violated.

Coaching and SAT scores (10.1) What proportion of students who take the SAT twice are coached? To answer this question, Jannie decides to construct a 99%confidence interval. Her work is shown below. Explain what’s wrong with Jannie’s method.

A 99%CI for p1-p2is

(0.135-0.865)±2.5750.135(0.865)3160+0.865(0.135)2733=-0.73±0.022=(-0.752,-0.708)

We are 99% confident that the proportion of students taking the SAT twice who are coached is between 71 and 75 percentage points lower than students who aren’t coached.

Coaching and SAT scores (10.2) What we really want to know is whether coached students improve more than uncoached students and whether any advantage is large enough to be worth paying for. Use the information above to answer these questions:

(a) Is there good evidence that coached students gained more on average than uncoached students? Carry out a significance test to answer this question.

(b) How much more do coach students gain on the average? Construct and interpret a 99% confidence interval.

(c) Based on your work, what is your opinion: do you think coaching courses are worth paying for?

Preventing drowning Drowning in bathtubs is a major cause of death in children less than 5 years old. A random sample of parents was asked many questions related to bathtub safety. Overall, 85% of the sample said they used baby bathtubs for infants. Estimate the percent of all parents of young children who use baby bathtubs.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free