Coaching and SAT scores (10.2) What we really want to know is whether coached students improve more than uncoached students and whether any advantage is large enough to be worth paying for. Use the information above to answer these questions:

(a) Is there good evidence that coached students gained more on average than uncoached students? Carry out a significance test to answer this question.

(b) How much more do coach students gain on the average? Construct and interpret a 99% confidence interval.

(c) Based on your work, what is your opinion: do you think coaching courses are worth paying for?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a). Yes, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that coached students are getting more on average than the uncoached students.

b). Thus, the confidence interval is (1.0002,15).

c). No, it is not worth paying.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step1: Given Information

x¯1=29,x¯2=21

s1=59,s2=52

n1=427,n2=2733

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

The test statistic formula is:

t=x¯1-x¯2s12n1+s22n2

The null and alternative hypotheses for the provided case are:

H0:μ1=μ2

H1:μ1μ2

The test statistic is computed as:

t=x¯1-x¯2-μ1-μ2s12n1+s22n2

=29-21592427+5222733

=2.646

03

Part (a) Step 3: Explanation

The degree of freedom is calculated as:

df=minn1-1,n2-1=min(427-1,2733-1)=426

The p-value:

P-value=0.0042

In this case, P-value =0.00424>0.05

The null hypothesis could not be rejected which is not showing the sufficient evidences for the claim at significance level of 5%.

04

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

Confidence level is95%.

05

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

The 95%confidence interval using Ti-83calculator is:

06

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information

Confidence level is95%.

07

Part (c) Step 2: Explanation

The above computed confidence interval is very close to the value 0 . Thus, no larger gain is being earned which implies that it is not worth paying for.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why the conditions for using two-sample z procedures to perform inference about p1-p2are not met in the settings

Shrubs and fire Fires are a serious threat to shrubs in dry climates. Some shrubs can resprout from their roots after their tops are destroyed. One study of resprouting took place in a dry area of Mexico.7The investigators randomly assigned shrubs to treatment and control groups. They clipped the tops of all the shrubs. They then applied a propane torch to the stumps of the treatment group to simulate a fire. All 12of the shrubs in the treatment group were resprouted. Only 8 of the 12 shrubs in the control group were resprouted.

41. Literacy rates Do males have higher average literacy rates than females in Islamic countries? The table below shows the percent of men and women at least 15years old who were literate in 2008in the major Islamic nations. (We omitted countries with populations of less than3million.) Data for a few nations, such as Afghanistan and Iraq, were not available.

The elderly fear crime more than younger people, even though they are less likely to be victims of crime. One study recruited separate random samples of 56black women and 63black men over the age of 65from Atlantic City, New Jersey. Of the women, 27said they “felt vulnerable” to crime; 46of the men said this.

(a) Construct and interpret a 90%confidence interval for the difference in population proportions (men minus women).

(b) Does your interval from part (a) give convincing evidence of a difference between the population proportions? Explain.

Dr Teresa Amabile conducted a study involving 47college students, who were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. The 23students in one group were given a list of statements about external reasons (E) for writing, such as public recognition, making money, or pleasing their parents. The 24students in the other group were given a list of statements about internal reasons (I) for writing, such as expressing yourself and enjoying playing with words. Both groups were then instructed to write a poem about laughter. Each student’s poem was rated separately by 12different poets using a creativity scale. The 12poets’ ratings of each student’s poem were averaged to obtain an overall creativity score. We used Fathom software to randomly reassign the 47subjects to the two groups 1000times, assuming the treatment received doesn’t affect each individual’s average creativity rating. The dot plot shows the approximate randomization distribution of x1-xE

(a) Why did researchers randomly assign the subjects to the two treatment groups?

(b) In the actual experiment, x1-xE=4.15. What conclusion would you draw? Justify your answer with appropriate evidence.

(c) Based on your conclusion in part (b), could you have made a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Refer to Exercise16.

(a) Carry out a significance test at the α=0.05level.

(b) Construct and interpret a 95%confidence interval for the difference between the population proportions. Explain how the confidence interval is consistent with the results of the test in part (a).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free