For which subject did the regression line overpredict fat gain by the most? Justify your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The residual is negative (-1.11kg)it could be said that for the point the fat gain has been over predicted

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

We need to justify that for which subject did the regression line overpredict fat gain by the most.

02

Explanation

We have the equation for the regression equation is:fatgain^=3.505-0.00344(NEAchange)

An increase in fat was expected for the topic that has an NEA modification of 580and a fat gain of0.4kg.

This makes the residual equal to -1.11kg, since the expected weight gain is 1.5kg.

It is possible that the fat gain has been overestimated for the point since the residual is negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The National Student Loan Survey provides data on the amount of debt for recent college graduates, their current income, and how stressed they feel about college debt. A sociologist looks at the data with the goal of using the amount of debt and income to explain the stress caused by college debt.

Measurements on young children in Mumbai, India, found this least-squares line for predicting height y from the arm span x y=6.4+0.93xMeasurements are in centimeters (cm).

According to the regression line, the predicted height of a child with an arm span of 100 cm is about

(a)106.4cm.(c)93cm.(e)7.33cm.(b)99.4cm.(d)15.7cm.

Teaching and research A college newspaper interviews a psychologist about student ratings of the teaching of faculty members. The psychologist says, “The evidence indicates that the correlation between the research productivity and teaching rating of faculty members is close to zero.” The paper reports this as “Professor McDaniel said that good researchers tend to be poor teachers, and vice versa.” Explain why the paper’s report is wrong. Write a statement in plain language (don’t use the word “correlation”) to explain the psychologist’s meaning.

If women always married men who were 2years older than themselves, what would the correlation between the ages of husband and wife be?

(a)2 (c) 0.5 (e) Can’t tell without

(b)1 (d) 0 seeing the data

Airlines have increasingly outsourced the maintenance of their planes to other companies. Critics say that the maintenance may be less carefully done so outsourcing creates a safety hazard. As evidence, they point to government data on the percent of major maintenance outsourced and the percent of flight delays blamed on the airline (often due to maintenance problems): Make a scatterplot by hand that shows how delays relate to outsourcing.

AirlineOutsource percentDelay percentAirTran6614Alaska9242American4626America West7639ATA1819Continental6920Delta4826Frontier6531Hawaiian8070JetBlue6818Northwest7643Southwest6820United7727US Airways6324

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free